Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Man Wraps Entire House In Plastic After Terror Warning
Local6.com. (Conn.) ^ | February 14, 2003

Posted on 02/15/2003 9:01:27 AM PST by veronica

Warnings from the Department of Homeland Security to get duct tape and plastic prompted a Connecticut man to wrap his entire house in plastic, according to a Local 6 News report.

Paul West said that he'd rather be safe than sorry.

So he bought hundreds of feet of plastic sheeting, batten boards, stapleguns, and ladders, to seal up his Winsted home.

"I just have all this energy from tension and anxiety and I don't know what to do with it," West said."Basically, I'm doing what the government says we should do. I may be doing it a little more energetically than some folks, but I'm trying to be pro-active rather than reactive."

The materials for the project cost about $250.

"My wife's not happy, but she puts up with it," West said. "My kids think it's a good thing to do."


TOPICS: Extended News; Miscellaneous; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: homelandinsecurity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: veronica
If the terrorists dont kill him
The mold will
21 posted on 02/15/2003 9:46:46 AM PST by joesnuffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
Every part of Cnnecticut that I am familiar with, has more building codes and restrictions than Durham, NC and Chapel Hill put together. This guy will get a visit from the zoning commishioners a long time before he tests his defencive preparations against terrorist attacks. This is a much more serious offence than plastic cows and over sized flags.

By the time the local gestapho finishes with him he will probably be wishing he did have something lethal to inhale.
22 posted on 02/15/2003 10:38:11 AM PST by F.J. Mitchell (Funny, I always thought the Main Stream was deeper and swifter than that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
Yeah, I wrapped my place in plastic, too.


23 posted on 02/15/2003 10:43:54 AM PST by Lady Jag (Googolplex Star Thinker of the Seventh Galaxy of Light and Ingenuity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
Not to mention the radon.
24 posted on 02/15/2003 10:48:37 AM PST by F.J. Mitchell (Funny, I always thought the Main Stream was deeper and swifter than that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: veronica
I'm doing what the government says we should do.

Important point here, consider the source.

25 posted on 02/15/2003 10:49:07 AM PST by WhiteGuy (Cynical)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
Basically, I'm doing what the government says we should do

The gov't said that, BUT it wasn't preceeded by "Simon says".

No Homeland Security decoder ring for this bozo.

26 posted on 02/15/2003 10:51:31 AM PST by Mulder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ofMagog
THAT was funny. New York has theirs with hillereeeee
27 posted on 02/15/2003 10:56:23 AM PST by cubreporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: veronica
"My wife's not happy, but she puts up with it," West said. "My kids think it's a good thing to do."
WELL, Well, well........ it looks like the SYSTEM is doing it's job real fine!
28 posted on 02/15/2003 1:27:40 PM PST by Elsie (Bullwinkle, watch out for Natasha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
This story is such fun.

For those who don't know, Winsted, CT is Ralph Nader's home town. It also did have a real catastrophe back in 1956 when the Housatonic (??) River flooded out the entire downtown.

Despite these two highlights of Winsted history the odds of AQ chemical or biological weaponry managing to threaten the residents of Winsted (which is upwind of virtually every major Eastern City) range somewhere between zero and zero.

Another major flood destroying the town is a _much_greater probability.

Of course I suppose if Nader ran again McAuliffe may have a fit of anger and demand a nuclear strike on the place. ;-)
29 posted on 02/15/2003 1:47:40 PM PST by cgbg (The liberal media exists just to irritate me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
This is warrrrr, dammit! -- Some here at FR are advocating that we ban beer for the duration:

In time of war, rights guaranteed by the Constitution
Address:http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/844190/posts?page=8
30 posted on 02/15/2003 2:06:36 PM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYDave
Why does he think that his backwater CT town is under threat? I live in NYC and I thumb my nose at anyone with evil intent.The Israelies did this during Gulf War I, and I didn't see anybody making fun of them when the SCUDS were falling. It's probably easier to ship a nuke into New York harbor than to actually hit a city in Israel with a SCUD fired from Iraq.

What direction does the prevailiing wind from NYC (or Boston I suppose) blow? He might survive, when you are nothing but radioactive dust. The very dust that won't be able to get into his house perhaps. More seriously, the idea is to have the stuff ready, and seal up a single room, not the whole house if and when. In case of a chemical attack, that would allow one to survive until the stuff disperses, in the case of a radiological (dirty bomb) , a fallout shelter would be better, but assuming one also thought to construct an air (dust) filter so as to be able to breath in the otherwise sealed up room, the sheeting and duct tape approach would have to do. In fact the pump for that filter could be made with the duct tape and sheeting, plus a cardboard box. The filters could be rolls of toilet paper with the center hole blocked off (with duct tape of course :) ) See the appendix to "Pulling Through" by Dean Ing, who got his stuff from official Civil Defense publications.

Nothing will save you if you are at ground zero of a nuke, or the point of attack of a chemical attack, but given a little warning, and assuming you aren't inside the blast radius, you can survive with only minimal preparation and supplies. Water, flashlights and batteries also required of course.

Just because something sounds silly (Duct tape for Pete's sake!) doesnt mean it is.

31 posted on 02/15/2003 2:44:14 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: veronica
I watched the video. The place is a wreck. It needs paint and oil on the hinge of that squeaky door.

What a Knothead!!!!!!!!!!!

32 posted on 02/15/2003 2:59:31 PM PST by RIGHT IN SEATTLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
Ynakee ingenuity ain't what it used to be.
33 posted on 02/15/2003 4:30:42 PM PST by GVnana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ofMagog
Indeed! Has not "The Bride Of Satan" told us, "It takes a village idiot"?
34 posted on 02/15/2003 7:58:12 PM PST by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: veronica
"My wife's not happy, but she puts up with it,"

Sounds like the wife is the only one with a pert of common sense!

35 posted on 02/15/2003 8:34:42 PM PST by ATOMIC_PUNK (An American Fellowship of Freedom loving Conservatives..... <*[[[[[><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
Senor Cat. Thank you for your response. Your point of view is well taken and well stated. However, according to what I've read in the press, a radiological bomb would devastate the immediate area of impact but the "fallout" would be minimal. I don't think that even a real nucular bomb would create the kind of fallout that would reach that little town in CT which is why I poked fun at the idea of this guy Christmas wrapping his house.

The most likely targets in NYC would be the financial district (near the former WTC) or transportation hubs such as Grand Central or Penn Station, or the subway system. I live outside of NYC to the east (yes, the prevailing winds generally blow west to east). I'm recently retired but may go back to work with my old firm as a consultant. That would place me one block north of "ground zero" which is where I was on 9/11/2001, but that's a whole other story.

I don't think any of this is "silly", but I'm not going to let these threats overwhelm my life. I'm old enough to remember "duck and cover" - ie. the airraid drills we had in grade school in the 50's.

Be prudent, my friend and be well. If you have command of Spanish as your moniker seems to suggest, then buena suerte, mi amigo.
36 posted on 02/16/2003 6:57:37 AM PST by NYDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: veronica

House wrapped in plastic attracted national media

WINSTED
Reader Essay
Paul West

I made national news last week. My picture was in the papers, national and local. How, you ask? Did I do something notorious, in the broadest sense of that term? You may decide for yourself.

I merely covered the greater portion of my house with plastic sheeting.

Under the threat of terrorist attack, and with a cold northwest wind blowing under the eaves of my small New England farm house, it seemed, as so many consequence-filled actions do, like a good idea.

All modern houses have what is called a "vapor barrier." This is nothing more than an air-impermeable layer of plastic or fiber installed under construction, under the clapboards or siding, amd it covers the whole house, right up to the windows and doors. It is part of modern building codes and practices. Modern homes also have modern windows, which are, unlike mine, actually designed to keep out cold air. Modern windows have double panes with thermal barriers, inherent weather stripping and non-conductive layers between the exterior and interior. The vapor barrier is "flashed," or vapor and water sealed, and when the windows are closed, air, water, even sound and ultraviolet light can be kept out.

How well these methods and materials of construction would help in the event of radioactive or chemical fallout is open to debate, but all these things can be measured in terms of degrees of exposure.

My house was built in the 1800s. From outside in, in cross section, my walls consist of cedar clapboards, 3/4-pine boards, native lumber studs (actual two-by-fours) and a layer of fiberboard and plaster. Remember the old fiberboard? It was made in 4-foot by 8-foot sheets and looked like it was made of pressed horse hair. Perhaps it was. It expands and contracts in reaction to temperature and humidity, unlike modem wallboard. This causes cracks in the plaster, and cold air finds those cracks.

My windows are vintage, original to the house. Vinyl window contractors drool when they drive by. They call me all the time. They truly want to help. But modern windows are made with clear, distortion-free glass. When you look through my windows, the world appears pleasantly swirled, and this effect changes as you move through the room. It is pleasing to me to preserve this old glass. It reminds me of the window views of my youth, when I was young enough to note such things and actively wonder at them. I wouldn't change them for the world.

The government tells us we can protect ourselves in the event of a terrorist attack by picking a safe room in the house, an interior room, and sealing ourselves in with duct tape and plastic. We then wait for the threat to pass. Will this work? I don't know. I'm just some guy, not a scientist. But I grasp the concept of minimizing the exposure to the "bad stuff," whatever it may be.

One Army newsletter describes a more elaborate scheme: You wrap your house in rolled plastic (this eliminates seams,) seal yourself in your safe room, then you set up a tent and crawl inside that. You have scuba tanks in the tent, which you set to slowly release good air. This creates a "positive pressure" inside the tent and room, so any air infIltration is from the inside going out, not the opposite. This, to me, sounds like it could actually work. Again, it's all about minimizing one's exposure. Presumably, the plume of radiation or nerve gas will disperse in time, and you can come back out, perhaps to help clean up the toxic waste. It's not a nice scenario to imagine, but at least you survived the initial attack.

Knowing all this, I decided to wrap my house with plastic. It was rather simple to do. Aided by my brother-in-law, we started at one comer and went around the house, fastening the plastic sheeting with staples and funing strips. (These are thin sticks of wood which are tacked on last, to keep the wind from getting under the plastic and shredding it.)

I did not use duct tape. Duct tape doesn't stick when it's 5 degrees out.

Now that we are done, the house looks a sight, but then again, it looked bad to start with. We scraped the walls of loose paint last summer, exposing the bare wood in many places. We planned to paint in the nice fall weather, when it wasn't hot and humid. Well, the fall never came, rather an early form of winter hit us in late September, with unseasonable cold and snow. Yes, up here on this hill in Northwest Connecticut, the ground was covered with snow in October. So we didn't get a chance to paint.

The plastic wrap is actually rather pleasant to look at in the nighttime, with a soft glow from the interior lights and odd shadows created by the plants on the window sills. From the inside, of course, our view is spoiled, but the effect is rather like the Japanese rice paper walls that admit light but afford privacy. It's different, but in cabin-fever season, different is good.

Well, the press got a hold of the story, and the world came to our door and knocked. And called. We were on the front page of the Republican-American, our local paper. A satellite truck got stuck in our driveway and had to be towed out. Howard Stern talked about our house. So too the ladies on "The View." CNN mentioned us, and MSNBC came and did an interview, complete with comments from my 9-year-old son and 7-year-old daughter. She said, with her precocious way, "Well, at first it looks kinda crazy, but it's good for protection."

But is it? Ah, the big question. I do not know. I do not know that when I tried to do something, attempted some preventive measure, I created a news story. That, to me, is a little scary. What I did made sense to me, what I call "common sense."

The press people handled me somewhat in the vein of "the crackpot up in the hills," but they were generally kind and efficient. The fire marshal came by and checked our Co2 detectors, which also made good sense. Do not seal yourself in anything without one of these! (Our detectors indicate 0 parts per million Co2.)

I received calls from strangers, some with advice, many indignant at my work. My wife's family thinks I'm a little crazy. All of this I handled as best I could, knowing as I did that everybody was forming some opinion of my actions. And that is fine, their opinions don't matter much to me. My daughter's does.

At least people are thinking: about preventive action, consequences, and perhaps, degrees of sanity. All react differently to this threat, this cloud of gloom and doom hanging over our heads, and the other shoe dropping after 9/11. We are living through a very scary time.

I aim to keep on living.

Paul West lives in Winchester.


The above is from the tinfoiler himself, found in today's above mentioned newspaper. The locals I've talked to share the same sentiments as his wife, myself included.

37 posted on 02/16/2003 7:26:11 AM PST by flim-flam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson