Skip to comments.
Saddam and the Next 9/11
The Wall Street Journal
| 14 February 2003
| Editorial Board
Posted on 02/14/2003 3:07:22 AM PST by Petronski
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Emphasis mine.
1
posted on
02/14/2003 3:07:23 AM PST
by
Petronski
To: Petronski
Huge bump. Despite the new much needed guidelines for re-posting articles already posted, it's early morning and I'm afraid not many people will see this and I hope you consider re-posting later this morning. Regards, Peach
2
posted on
02/14/2003 3:19:52 AM PST
by
Peach
To: Dog; Miss Marple; Howlin; Wait4Truth
An FYI ping. The WSJ connects Saddam and anthrax and ways I've not previously seen.
3
posted on
02/14/2003 3:20:52 AM PST
by
Peach
To: Petronski
Can I ask a question here? Is there any real reason why we cannot tell, not ask, tell Musharif that we are going into his western border areas to get Binny? Why are we playing this cat and mouse game? From what I understand the army units there are barely loyal, if loyal at all, the hold of the area by the Pakis is weak at best and the area is more closly aligned with the east of Afghanistan than Pakistan, meaning they are under the control of "warlords" and robber barons.
Find this guy with Special Forces and kill him. Anyone think this is being done? Is it practical?
4
posted on
02/14/2003 3:38:25 AM PST
by
Adder
To: Peach
I will bump your 'repost' idea, but I doubt I'll have time to repost it. Just keep it bumped.
5
posted on
02/14/2003 3:46:11 AM PST
by
Petronski
(I'm not always cranky.)
To: Petronski
BTTT
To: Petronski
I'll go look at some anthrax files I have and ping a few more people. Bump.
7
posted on
02/14/2003 4:11:49 AM PST
by
Peach
To: Petronski
Bump!
8
posted on
02/14/2003 4:15:04 AM PST
by
mhking
("The home team Iraqis have won the toss and elected to receive...")
To: Oldeconomybuyer; Sacajaweau; copycat; Shermy; OldFriend; aristeides; chainsaw; Mitchell; ...
The WSJ staff editors connect Saddam and anthrax using Saddam's own words; new information to me and perhaps you too. A fascinating read bump.
9
posted on
02/14/2003 4:22:25 AM PST
by
Peach
To: Peach; Petronski
The WSJ staff editors connect Saddam and anthrax using Saddam's own words; new information to me and perhaps you too. A fascinating read bump.I'm archiving this great post. Thanks, and a HUGE....BTTT
10
posted on
02/14/2003 4:30:08 AM PST
by
BOBTHENAILER
(Just like Black September. One by one, we're gonna get 'em.)
Comment #11 Removed by Moderator
To: afraidfortherepublic; kattracks; Leisler; astounded; Fred Mertz; Semper911; snopercod; ...
WSJ editorial staff use Saddam's own words and other info to connect Saddam to the anthrax attacks. Lots of info I'd never seen before and perhaps you haven't either. An important read. Bump.
12
posted on
02/14/2003 4:35:26 AM PST
by
Peach
To: Peach
BTTT
To: Peach
bttt
Comment #15 Removed by Moderator
Comment #16 Removed by Moderator
To: Petronski
"drive off the Marines" Riiiight. Refer to tagline.
17
posted on
02/14/2003 5:10:07 AM PST
by
Marines981
("GOD, Marines, and Country")
To: All
18
posted on
02/14/2003 5:14:05 AM PST
by
Cindy
To: Peach
Thanks for the ping bump.
19
posted on
02/14/2003 5:36:38 AM PST
by
Seeking the truth
(I'm going on the FRN Cruise - How about you?)
To: Petronski
bump
20
posted on
02/14/2003 6:02:10 AM PST
by
Maelstrom
(To prevent misinterpretation or abuse of the Constitution:The Bill of Rights limits government power)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson