Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: js1138
Anyone with skill or resources could intercept and decrypt all kinds of communication

What you know about encryption could apperently fit in a thimble. Even the most garden-variety SSH packet flow is secure against anyone with "resources" short of the NSA's.

Any commercial venture that fails to use strong encryption gets what it deserves.

Laws that criminalize cracking lame encryption criminalize behavior that can only be detected by intrusive means. That's the downside: Are you ready to make your PC an open book to be inspected by anyone with a claim that their encrypted content might have been cracked on your PC?

187 posted on 02/13/2003 6:47:53 AM PST by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]


To: eno_
Laws that criminalize cracking lame encryption criminalize behavior that can only be detected by intrusive means

I think that selling thousands of devices capable of breaking "lame" encryption is hardly exempt from being called criminal behavior.

Now if someone in the privacy of their home breaks DSS codes and doesn't sell or distribute anything, I'd hardly think that worthy of criminal prosecution, even though I'd call the person a thief.

192 posted on 02/13/2003 7:00:33 AM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson