Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No more imperial presidency: Joseph Farah urges Bush to vacate Clinton's executive orders ^ | Tuesday, February 4, 2003 | Joseph Farah

Posted on 02/03/2003 11:54:31 PM PST by JohnHuang2

The greatest fear of America's founders was the establishment of a strong central government and an ambitious, power-hungry political leader at the center of that government.

Washington, Jefferson, Adams and Madison had their fill of kings and dictators. They believed the best assurance against centralized authority was a loose association of sovereign states, which maintained most governmental power at the local level.

Further, the system of government established by these men at the federal level assured a separation of powers limiting the president's role to the executive and prohibiting the office from usurping legislative power.

Article 1 of the U.S. Constitution thus provides: "All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives."

During his eight years in the White House, Bill Clinton systematically ignored that constitutional provision and misused his office to go over the heads of Congress, as his own aides explained, and institute his own legislative agenda through executive orders.

As Paul Begala explained in July 1998 in an interview in the Los Angeles Times: "Stroke of the pen. Law of the land. Kinda cool."

Because of the tremendous opposition to many of those executive orders stirred mainly by the reporting of WorldNetDaily, Clinton was forced to withdraw or suspend some of the scariest – such as EO 13083, which would have annihilated the principles of federalism that have guided the nation for the last 200 years.

Others, however, have survived as policy two years into the Bush administration. One of the ugliest, EO 13166, is about to get a challenge in Congress.

Executive Order 13166 requires all government agencies and any entity that received federal funds to provide spontaneous translations – night and day – to anyone who needs them. Any programs and activities normally provided in English must be accessible to those with limited proficiency in English in the language of their choice.

In other words, without any public debate, without any basis in law, EO 13166 effectively made the inability to speak English a protected civil right.

Finally, someone in Congress is standing up to this insult to the legislative branch as well as the Constitution and the will of the people. Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., has introduced legislation to repeal EO 13166. His bill, H.R. 300, would effectively void 13166 as well as forbid the expenditure of any taxpayer funds to enforce it. This is a good start and an effort that deserves all of our support.

Yet, it's just a start. All of Clinton's executive orders need to be reviewed systematically by the Bush administration. With a stroke of the pen, President Bush can legally, constitutionally and morally overturn every single one. This is the most efficient way to ensure that illegal, inappropriate, unconstitutional and immoral executive orders do not stand as the law of the land, do not result in injustice and do not cause additional taxpayer funds to be squandered.

Further, Clinton's executive orders policy needs to be repudiated by officials of both political parties. The current occupant of the White House and all future presidents should be on notice that they do not have the power to legislate, they do not have the power to go over the heads of Congress and they do not have the power to create law in the land with a stroke of the pen.

What do you call it when one man has such sweeping powers? You call it totalitarianism. You call it tyranny. You call it dictatorship. We must never allow another president to venture into those dangerous waters again. The only way we will avoid it is by exposing the abuses of the past.

President Clinton didn't just get away with molesting a young intern in the Oval Office. He didn't just get away with lying under oath. He didn't just get away with corruption in Arkansas. He didn't just get away with taking Chinese political contributions. He didn't just get away with using the Internal Revenue Service as an attack dog on his political foes. He didn't just get away with cover-ups that will take a generation to unravel.

He got away with subverting the Constitution. It must not be allowed to happen again.

TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
Tuesday, February 4, 2003

Quote of the Day by leadpenny

1 posted on 02/03/2003 11:54:31 PM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
I'm shocked. Peter King is my congressman, and ever since I watched him kissing up to the Clinton's I have had no use for him at all. I suppose an email to him of my support for this bill won't kill me, but it will be very painful! Anything to undo the Clinton years!!!
2 posted on 02/04/2003 12:03:04 AM PST by DKNY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Bush rescinded 8 Executive orders the 1st month in office. He blocked many more from being published in the Federal Registry. He has no executive authority to rescind any of Clinton's "monument declarations" under the Antiquities Act but many insist on calling them “Executive orders”. To say that Bush has not blocked the majority of EOs is ignorant or worse.
3 posted on 02/04/2003 12:12:16 AM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
In case no one has noticed GWB is doing some stroking of the pen too.
Executive Orders Disposition Tables
87 to date.
Then there are the NSPDs and HSPDs
16 to date.
4 posted on 02/04/2003 12:56:58 AM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
To say that Bush has not blocked the majority of EOs is ignorant or worse.
Clinton had over 60 PRDs, over 80 PDDs and over 350 EOs.
I'm confused. You've only cited a very few. I don't think that he has blocked more than half (the majority) of Clinton's EOs. Half would be roughly 175, and that's just the EOs.
I guess I'm just ignorant or worse.
5 posted on 02/04/2003 1:08:23 AM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
I was talking about the 100 he issued on his last day in office. As to the others there may have been some that were meritorious and others that were just plain frivolous. I do know that 2 of Bush’s countervailing EOs were overturned by the courts when the Unions sued him.
6 posted on 02/04/2003 1:16:46 AM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
Moving quickly after taking office, President George W. Bush yesterday issued an order that essentially blocked some of the last-minute executive orders and rules laid down by outgoing president Bill Clinton.

The order was thought to apply to such orders as new regulations for managed-care programs under Medicare, and new environmental rules on runoff from animal feeding operations.

Mr Bush's move did not apply to the 140 presidential pardons and 36 prison sentence commutations that Mr Clinton issued less than two hours before his term expired.

Mr Bush's order, signed by the new White House chief of staff, Andrew Card, said the decision was made to ensure that the President's appointees "have the opportunity to review any new or pending" regulations.

The order meant that no new rules could be printed in the Federal Register. This blocked them because the rules cannot take effect until they have been in the register for a set time. Mr Bush also issued a 60-day stay on regulations that were published in the Federal Register but had not yet taken effect.

Some of the blizzard of rules issued by Mr Clinton in his last days in office angered Republicans, particularly his decision to declare nearly 24 million hectares of federal land, mostly in the western states, off limits to logging.

That order, however, came after a lengthy federal review period and would appear to be extremely difficult to withdraw.

7 posted on 02/04/2003 1:30:16 AM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
And the rest are still there...
I don't think he'll do very much about them.
If you'll note there are some that are still in effect from quite some time back. It isn't just x42's that need rescinding, though his are the freshest in the mind, next to GWB's.
8 posted on 02/04/2003 1:36:01 AM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
New Executive Order:

                All orders and pardons from impeached presidents shall be null and void.

Here's your belated Merry Christmas present,

                                                        George W. Bush

9 posted on 02/04/2003 2:25:37 AM PST by Rain-maker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


The Commerce Dept which runs the Patent Office gave away
all US secrets on energy to China, but under the corrupt officials
and traitors who run the Patent Office, all energy related patents involving new sources remain ungranted, and
the researchers under attack despite the US Constitution permitting such patents.

President Bush: How about an iota of accountability.
Please remove Q. Todd Dickenson and other corrupt officials at the Patent Office TODAY.

10 posted on 02/04/2003 4:07:34 AM PST by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson