Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mutual funds set to be big winners from Bush proposals
Financial Times ^ | February 1 2003 4:00 | By Lauren Foster and Julie Earle in New York

Posted on 02/01/2003 8:50:34 PM PST by DeaconBenjamin

The new Lifetime Savings Account unveiled by the Treasury Department yesterday will be the most flexible tax-advantaged savings plan available in the US and could prove to be a boon for the mutual funds industry, experts said yesterday.

The accounts will allow anyone, regardless of age or income, to contribute $7,500 a year and make penalty-free withdrawals at any time. Contributions will be made after tax, but earnings will accumulate tax-free. Withdrawals will also be tax-free.

The most significant change is that there will be no restriction on what the withdrawn savings can be used for. Currently there are non-retirement saving plans available for college education - including a state-sponsored college savings plan - and healthcare.

Britain has had a scheme similar to the Lifetime Savings Account in place since the late 1980s and by last year savers had more than $110bn invested in the accounts, which have become a lucrative source of fees for the financial services industry.

Lifetime Savings Accounts would be administered by a bank or a person approved by the Inland Revenue Service, the Treasury said. More than 60 per cent of equity fund assets are held in tax-deferred retirement accounts (such as traditional IRAs), which require recipients to pay income tax on withdrawal.

Fidelity, the leading mutual fund firm and largest provider of workplace retirement savings plans, welcomed the new proposal. "Through tax-advantaged savings vehicles, the fundamental concept of savings is more attractive," it said.

Avi Nachmany, director of research at Strategic Insight, a New York-based mutual fund research company, said: "Every additional tax benefit creates an even greater incentive to be in equity funds."

The Treasury yesterday said it hoped the proposals would encourage saving by simplifying the rules. Pam Olson, Treasury assistant secretary for tax policy, said research suggested the new proposals would encourage savings by low- and middle-income earners who were deterred from using existing schemes because of the restrictions on withdrawals that qualify for tax relief.

But many industry experts said the Lifetime Savings Account - and its sister plan, the Retirement Savings Account - would benefit the rich and have little effect on national savings.

"This proposal and other aspects of Mr Bush's tax package are good for wealthy Americans, but it isn't clear this [latest] proposal will encourage a broad cross-section to increase their savings habits," said Gary Schatsky, former chairman of the National Association of Personal Financial Advisers.

William Gale, a tax specialist at the Brookings Institution in Washington DC, said the Lifetime Savings Accounts proposal was "heavily weighted" to higher-income households.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 02/01/2003 8:50:34 PM PST by DeaconBenjamin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin
A step in the right direction.
2 posted on 02/01/2003 8:53:18 PM PST by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ciexyz
Earnings will accummulate tax-free?!?! Kowabunga!
3 posted on 02/01/2003 8:54:17 PM PST by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin
Tax free? Whoa Baby!

Wait a minute...this is only for the top 10 percent right...and it's unfair because people with no money can't save.
4 posted on 02/01/2003 8:58:13 PM PST by Samwise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin
Similar to the Roth, but the limit is $7,500/person, this is $3,500 more a year than the Roth. Very significant.
5 posted on 02/01/2003 8:59:56 PM PST by Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin
This is great news. Every little bit helps.

You probably heard about taking the tax off dividends. But there's an even greater benefit you may not have heard about, the "Excludable Distribution Account." Check it out.^ This is gonna drive the RATS crazy!!

6 posted on 02/01/2003 9:04:27 PM PST by upchuck (Prayer: †††††††)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justice
Can everyone contribute? Is there a limit on income that would make someone ineligible?

(For instance, I can't contribute to an IRA because I'm covered by a pension plan and I make over a certain limit.)

7 posted on 02/01/2003 9:04:56 PM PST by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin
Mutual funds set to be big winners from Bush proposals

Really? WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

8 posted on 02/01/2003 9:05:52 PM PST by Dan from Michigan (I feel the need...for speed!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justice
A little something to think about: What's to keep some future klintoonesque maladministration from CHANGING THE DEAL and levy tax on those after tax deposit accounts, citing some "national emergency" as the reason?

Anyone recall the klintoon era proposal to hit EVERY PRIVATE PENSION FUND with a "ONE TIME" 15% LEVY??

Fortunately, wiser heads prevailed?

THAT TIME!

There IS a better way!!

IF YOU WANT THIS MAN – AND MEN LIKE HIM – TO REMAIN IN CONTROL OF YOUR ECONOMIC AND PERSONAL DESTINY, CONTINUE TO TOLERATE THE CURRENT MARXIST INCOME TAX SYSTEM.

ONE MORE TIME:

IT’S ABOUT

P O W E R AND C O N T R O L!!

SIGN THE PETITION AT HTTP://WWW.VOTR.ORG. Then find out how you can do more to end America’s peculiar SPRING MADNESS.

9 posted on 02/01/2003 9:11:45 PM PST by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ciexyz
This poorly written article suggests that the accounts are currently available. This account was simply a proposal in Bush's state of the union address. It still has to run get past the libs, who are sure to try to derail it (libs don't save; they rely on the gub'mit to bail them out).
I think, as proposed by Bush, that there was no means testing--anyone could contribute. I also thought he suggested it would be for specific purposes, like home or car purchase, but I could be wrong.
We ain't there yet.
10 posted on 02/01/2003 9:13:58 PM PST by JoeFromCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson