Please don't.
I can think of about 3,000 souls who would almost certainly approve had they not had their lives snuffed out in Manhattan on September 11, 2001. They died because the previous Commander in Chief (or should I say "Grand Pervert") lacked the skill and fortitude to make the decisions that President Bush is making now. Bush is preventing ten 9/11s, snuffing them out at the bud stage.
Why not? You've already reached ad nauseum.
Well, if we believe it will be easier to build a friendly Iraqi government than a Saudi one, why not start with Iraq. This is not a war of revenge, but I guess, you take it as so wishing the 77% to have war upon them. Again, you have no clue and need to get out of your communist power and class struggle cave.
Last but not least.... it is not about Israel, but about destroying the US of A, and Saddam has been dreaming about the same arab unity that the PLO serves for against US interests, and he has instigated the PLO for good reasons...
From Their Own Mouth!
"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct 'Palestinian people' to oppose Zionism."
PLO executive committee member Zahir Muhsein,
After Iraq, we will get the Saudis.
This must be 'selective hearing' and manipulation of the 'message'. I heard none of that. I heard 'liberty and freedom' that only comes with a cost. A plan for medication, help for children of families separated by bars, and liberation of an imprisoned and imperiled Iraqi people.
We both heard a call for 'Peace', and talk is not 'ACTION'!
If i have to, i'll go get Osama myself. Let's roll.
I've read through all the posts in this thread, but I'd like to revisit your original post, Darheel. I added the second quote (from your Freeper homepage) to illustrate in a more graphic manner the inconsistency you are inserting in your "argument".
BTW - I don't do flame, and I don't really care about others who do. To me it's simply a matter of not being able to express one's opinion coherently enough without trying to tear down someone else.
There were definitely two parts to the SOTU speech last night. First, the President presented his domestic priorities. I don't agree with all of them. But that's the agenda he wants to push.
Engaging in hyperbole like "orphans get chained to a filthy bed", etc., without attribution of the justification for such a rant is nonsense. Further, you also appear to veer ever leftward with your comments about the next "morph" of "the war". If you can't present a better argument, perhaps you should refrain from posting.
As for "15 of 19"... Think back to WWII. When we bombed Germany, which was a more prized target: A barracks full of soldiers, or a weapons plant turning out the arms needed by those soldiers? Which kind of target is Iraq? Which would Saudi be?
Finally, in later posts you responded to others' crass remarks by citing your niece's role in the military. Condescension on that score is garbage. I'm a vet (with my own combat patch). Many others here are, too. God bless your niece for filling her role in the Marines, but don't suppose it gives you any moral authority to post nonsense and have it automatically respected.