[anniegetyourgun]

I swear, they're trying to get us all killed. So much for "standing shoulder-to-shoulder" with the president. Heck, they won't even stand shoulder-to-shoulder with their fellow countrymen. It's one thing to be an obstructionist on re-naming a D.C. airport, but it's downright traitorous on such matters of import in these perilous days.

[Cultural Jihad]

I swear, they're trying to get us all killed.

Well, perhaps they are playing to their environwacko constituencies, who view all of humanity as nothing but a cancer upon the body of Mother Earth.

[RedBloodedAmerican]

If this is the case, then what are the Dems standing to gain by opposing removing Saddam?

1. Seeing the Repubs finish what Clinton could not; removing Saddam.
2. An attempt to lessen the support America has of President Bush
3. Saving face in an attempt to stop the war on terrorism from being successful (which they opposed)
4. Getting their 2004 candidate to the front of the news. Which Senator is crossing their state line to argue and publicly (in the media) fault Bush? Clinton.

Democrats are evil, pure and simple.

Who else is opposing Bush and standing shoulder to shoulder with the Dems? Any "True Conservatives"?