'No place in life or law'

Washington Times ^ | Tuesday, January 21, 2003 | Ward Connerly

[JohnHuang2]

For the past several days, I have found myself doing something of which I am unaccustomed: defending a member of the Bush family on the subject of racial preferences. Unfortunately, while such a comment sounds like familial profiling, I speak from personal experience with two of the three Bushes I have met, and from observation of the third.

[JohnHuang2]

Tuesday, January 21, 2003

Quote of the Day by MozartLover

[Brad’s Gramma]

When I grow up It'll be my turn to defend our country. Freedom is worth fighting for.
	Please join us. Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794 or you can use PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!

[rdf]

The government's briefs are a cold, politically calculated legal argument against "quotas," as practiced by the University of Michigan. They are not documents that offer, as many would have hoped, a sweeping condemnation of race preferences any place in America, or that refute the idiocy of the nauseating blather about creating "diversity" that emanates from the higher-education cartel.

On the mark, Ward!

Cheers,

Richard F.

[TLBSHOW]

bttt

[TLBSHOW]

— WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court said on Tuesday it scheduled arguments on April 1 in two politically charged cases challenging the University of Michigan's affirmative action policies that favor minority applicants.

In the newly released calendar for late March and early April, the justices will hear one hour of arguments in the case on undergraduate admissions and one hour of arguments in the other case on law school admissions.