Some leftist out here(In NM) was satating this as fact...I assume he was quoting from sources such as this or is there any basis in fact for this accusation?
I supose that what is referred to here is the "spent uranium" used in some types of anti-tank shells. Note that, as far as I know, only tanks fire shells with "spent-uranium" (to make them more dense, to more easily penetrate armor). It is not used in bombs, there's no point.
The radiation level is very low. Naturally occuring radon gas in the ground is more dangerous.
British activists
have been very passionate
about depleted
uranium. They've
been on CNN, and have
lots of big web sites.
(FYI, again
Ramsey Clark has been working
on this issue, too.)