Posted on 01/17/2003 10:52:17 PM PST by chance33_98
From the black, loose-fitting chador of Iran to the dense, gridlike facial veil on the body-enveloping burqa in Afghanistan, the veiling of Islamic women has fueled fierce debate within feminist circles about the perceived role of the hijab - roughly translated as the Islamic dress code for women - in enforcing gender exclusion and inequality.
... "Veil," University of Southern California anthropology professor Fadwa El Guindi [a woman] lays out a fresh but sometimes one-sided analysis of some of the multifaceted uses and meanings of the veil (and other, modest Islamic dress) in Arabic-speaking Muslim societies. ...
El Guindi alludes, ever so briefly, to the harsh impact of the law on women's lives. But she abruptly and simplisticly reframes the issue as a matter of ultimate empowerment for women: "The enforcement of hijab can be as empowering as its ban," writes El Guindi. "While it undoubtedly restricts some women, it emancipates others by legitimizing their presence in public life."
At least the courts punished him. He got a few years in prison, and everyone was surprised he got anything.
The victim now lives in Maryland, and has been fitted with acrylic eyes and a prosthetic nose.
I would not be surprised if the thing , upon release, doesn't try to slip into the USA to finish the job. Or maybe one of his relatives. Defense of the family honor, and all that.
As someone said after 9-11, "Where were the girls at the Towers? Every fire-fighter was a man, as was essentially every policeman, every rescure worker, and all the construction workers who showed-up to dig out the rubble. Manly men were suddenly back in fashion, while the latte-sipping, pour-the-wine New York Times, liberal, girly men were suddenly out of fashion."
It's traditional to say something like, "I hope he gets 'The Business' from Big Mike while he's in prison!" (or words to this effect...)
In This case, however, its a GIVEN that he's getting -and giving- 'The Business'...
The problem is that he's having a BALL! These throwbacks switch from a woman to a man to a goat to a knothole without giving it a second thought... It's all grist to their mills.
the postcolonial notion that brown men, having been victimized by the West, can never be oppressors in their own right. If they give the appearance of treating women badly, the oppression they have suffered at the hands of Western colonial masters is to blame. In fact, the worse they treat women, the more they are expressing their own justifiable outrage.
The most appalling racism and hesperophobia on display.
This from a liberal, pro-abortion, NOW & ACLU card carrying member.
Thanks for the correction. But my main point remains: NOW has long become a pack of bile-filled, man-hating dinosaurs, better off soon extinct.
Women and girls were forbidden to go to school or work outside of the home.
Women and girls could not leave their homes without a male relative.
Women were forced to wear a head-to-toe covering called a "burqa" with only a small mesh opening through which to breathe and see.
Women were beaten and killed for not being properly covered or escorted.
The windows of homes occupied by women had be painted to prevent women from being seen.
Health care for Afghan women and girls was virtually non-existent since male doctors could not care for female patients.
Women were forbidden from speaking in public.
Pubescent girls and women were prohibited from speaking to males who were not close relatives.
Women who wore nail polish had their fingers cut off. It was illegal for women to pluck their eyebrows.
Some Afghan women drank battery acid to commit suicide, choosing a painful death rather than life under Taliban rule.
The Woman in the photo below was murdered because her husband accused her of ifidelity.
I have developed a theory, that when any organization is built around a single concept (like NOW for women's rights), once the organization has been successful in achieving its objective, the mainstream members leave and the loonies take over. It gives them "meaning" in their wacked out lives.
They averted their eyes and remain silent becaused they're pissed. It was the despised patriarchy, in the form of U.S. troops, that effectively liberated the Afghan women, and not Gloria Steinem's speeches. How dare the patriarchy do such a thing!?
The only goal the feminists have is to have an abortion clinin on every corner in those countries just as they have in ours. They really don't care if women make the same as men because on the average they still don't and they don't care about rape either because as we saw the feminists actually defended Bill Clinton and sided against the woman in that case ---they were actually angry that she ever brought it up and made statements that a rape 20 years ago didn't matter. They defended his requiring sexual favors from female subordinates so they prove that's not an issue they have either. He's pro-abortion and that's all that matters.
I don't think so either. It's fine with the NOW group and other feminists that this Islamic woman had her eyes gouged out but if she was denied an abortion they'd be all in an uproar about her "rights".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.