Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jesse Jackson: Wall Street Built On 'African Burial Ground'
CNSNEWS.com ^ | 1/16/03 | Marc Morano

Posted on 01/16/2003 3:49:03 AM PST by kattracks

New York (CNSNews.com) - Jesse Jackson, in a speech on Wednesday, declared that New York's financial district was built on an "African burial ground" and achieved prosperity "on the backs of African people."

Jackson made his remarks at the 6th annual Rainbow/Push Wall Street Project fund-raiser in New York City.

Jackson also said discriminatory policies in 19th century America attracted immigrants who were "looking for 100 free acres, the right to kill an Indian, and free labor."

One of the panelists at the conference sharply disagreed with the Wall Street Project's racial agenda and questioned Jackson's intentions.

"On balance, this event does not advance the cause of civil rights," said panelist Roger Clegg, general counsel for the Center for Equal Opportunity, a group opposed to affirmative action. "I think it's good for Reverend Jackson, but I don't think it's good for anyone else," Clegg added.

At a Diversity Forum panel discussion, Jackson slammed Wall Street for its historical links to the shipping industry and its role in the transportation of African slaves. "Wall Street is built on the backs of African people. It is an African burial ground down here. Wall Street was built on the shipping industry," Jackson said.

The 2003 Wall Street Project is being billed as "Equity for All: Establishing the Economic Agenda for Growth," and it runs from Jan. 14-17 in New York.

Jackson believes that government policies have caused African-Americans to miss out on numerous economic opportunities throughout America's history.

"At the beginning of the (20th) century, before we had the right to vote, all these [economic] territories were given away - automobile territories, fast food franchise territories, federal licenses, Homestead Act land grants, universities, all of this was given as largess," he said.

Jackson also claimed that the influx of immigrants to America during the late 19th century stemmed from government handouts. "People didn't come here looking for religious freedom; people came here looking for 100 free acres, the right to kill an Indian, and free labor."

Jackson kept his focus on New York's financial center to make a point about the need for slave reparations and affirmative action.

"In 1840, there was more Africans enslaved in New York than there was in Charleston South Carolina," he said. "So if we didn't know all our history, then the conclusion [that blacks deserve reparations] might seem unfair."

Jackson compared opposition to slave reparations to denying the holocaust.

"In Germany today, if you deny the holocaust, it is illegal, it is illegal, besides being immoral," Jackson explained.

"If slavery is a non-issue, if we are considered in the Constitution a non-issue, if the 1863 Emancipation Proclamation was a non-issue, if the 13th, 14th, 15th amendments were a non-issue, then 1896 ("separate but equal" Plessy v. Ferguson ruling) didn't happen and 1954 (the ruling that segregation is unconstitutional in Brown v. Board of Education) wasn't quiet, then reparations is foolishness. It is unfair to white people," he said to laughter.

"But if those dates are real, if there was a time when the woman by virtue of being a woman couldn't vote... [then] you cannot give up the whereas and leap over to the therefore," Jackson said.

In an interview with CNSNews.com following his speech, Jackson attacked the Bush administration's racial policies.

"There is no future in limiting the marketplace, that is why it is so strange that on the actual date of Martin Luther King's birth [Jan. 15], when the marketplace is looking for ways to open the door, President Bush is drawing up litigation to figure out ways to close the doors," Jackson said of the Bush administration's decision Wednesday to declare its opposition to the University of Michigan race-based admissions policies. The Supreme Court will decide the future of affirmative action programs in the pivotal case.

"There is no commitment to enforce laws of inclusion, no commitment to affirmative action. [Bush] doesn't believe in it. No commitment to EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission,) to class-action discrimination, gender- or race-based lawsuits," Jackson explained.

"The government has turned its back on us," he added.

Asked if the scheduled appearance by two Bush administration officials at his conference was an attempt by the administration to reach out to the minority community, Jackson was not convinced. Federal Communication Commission Chairman Michael Powell and Commissioner of the Securities and Exchange Commission Roel Campos are scheduled to appear at a Wall Street Project awards luncheon on Thursday.

"There is no connection, because these are very qualified men. If affirmative action becomes illegal, then [their appearance] has no value. So these are very able men but they need civil rights law to enforce," Jackson said.

'Trent Lott card'


Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.), also a panelist at the Diversity Forum, brought up Sen. Trent Lott's name in a discussion about affirmative action.

"We in the Congressional Black Caucus are going to play our Trent Lott card, and we are in the process of asking, as a result of Trent Lott's appearance on BET," for his support in defending affirmative action.

Lott appeared on Black Entertainment Television and pledged support for affirmative action in an apparent attempt to defuse the fallout following his controversial remarks at former Sen. Strom Thurmond's 100th birthday party in December.

Conyers agreed with Jackson's assessment of the Bush administration's racial policies. "They are cutting back on every front. We don't need affirmative action, that is what is coming out on Martin Luther King's birthday?" Conyers asked.

Conyers, who has been an annual sponsor of a slavery reparations bill in Congress for the past decade, spoke of the necessity for corporate reparations to African-Americans.

"The shipping companies were involved in the transportation of slaves. Might they not have a legal obligation going back 200 years? That is what I think," Conyers told CNSNews.com.

Conyers noted that lawsuits against the insurance industry for its alleged profiting from the slave trade were already proliferating. "No one is waiting for [attorney] Johnnie Cochran...people are suing the crap out of them right now," Conyers explained.

Conyers was also unimpressed with the scheduled appearance by two Bush administration officials."I don't think Michael Powell has ever seen a deregulation proposal that he doesn't like," Conyers lamented.

"[The Bush administration] is not reaching out on anything...it is abolishing affirmative action - that's not reaching out," he said.

'Shakedowns'


One panelist at the diversity forum surprised the crowd with his blunt opposition to affirmative action. Roger Clegg said, "Discrimination is wrong whether the victim is white or black or the victim is male or female."

Clegg attacked the whole purpose of Jackson's Wall Street Project.

"Reverend Jackson is encouraging companies to engage in exactly the kind of discrimination that the civil rights movement opposed," Clegg told CNSNews.com.

"Unfortunately, there are a lot of organizations, and I don't think Jesse Jackson is the only example of this, but there are a lot of shakedowns that take place these days in the name of civil rights and diversity, and I think that's wrong," he added.

Clegg sharply disagreed with Jackson and Conyers on reparations.

"I think it's ridiculous to argue that Americans now should either receive a check or have to write a check based on their skin color," Clegg said.

Clegg said the two Bush administration officials scheduled to appear at Jackson's conference "should make clear in their remarks that the administration does not support discrimination based on race, ethnicity or gender."

Clegg believes Jackson's organization showed some courage in inviting him to speak. "They invited me, so I have to give them credit for that," he said.

Conyers went out of his way to praise Clegg's appearance on the panel.

"He is the most reasonable adversary I have ever met on the subject in my life. It's easy to dislike the people that are opposed to the positions that I raise," Conyers said.

Clegg, noting that he did not agree with the agenda of the Wall Street Project, said, "It wouldn't break my heart if next year I don't get invited because they are not having this event."

See Related Story:
Bush Administration 'Duped' By Jesse Jackson Event (6 Jan. 2003)

E-mail a news tip to Marc Morano.

Send a Letter to the Editor about this article.






TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: wallstshakedown
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

1 posted on 01/16/2003 3:49:03 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
DONATE TODAY!!!.
SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

2 posted on 01/16/2003 3:50:52 AM PST by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"At the beginning of the (20th) century, before we had the right to vote, all these [economic] territories were given away - automobile territories, fast food franchise territories, federal licenses, Homestead Act land grants, universities, all of this was given as largess," he said.

They were giving away fast food franchises at the beginning of the 20th century?

3 posted on 01/16/2003 3:51:33 AM PST by Poohbah (Strategery is a beautiful thing :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Wall Street was built on the site of a defensive wall for the Dutch colony of New Amsterdam. Still, even if Jesse Jackson was speaking figuratively, he's an idiot. What made America an industrial power and developed its industry was ingenuity, not slavery.

Regards, Ivan

4 posted on 01/16/2003 3:51:37 AM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Hey Jesse! The check's in the mail.
5 posted on 01/16/2003 3:51:47 AM PST by billorites
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; Khepera; elwoodp; MAKnight; condolinda; mafree; Trueblackman; FRlurker; Teacher317; ...
Gypsy Jackson desperation alert!

Black conservative ping

If you want on (or off) of my black conservative ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail. (And no, you don't have to be black to be on the list!)

Extra warning: this is a high-volume ping list.

6 posted on 01/16/2003 3:52:22 AM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
BUMP
7 posted on 01/16/2003 3:57:28 AM PST by RippleFire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
This guy needs a padded room....
8 posted on 01/16/2003 3:58:46 AM PST by Georgia_JimD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Georgia_JimD
I believe the technical expression (from the Monty Python Fish License skit) is "he's gone off his chump."
9 posted on 01/16/2003 4:03:28 AM PST by Poohbah (Strategery is a beautiful thing :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mhking
Jessie is a racist, Conyers is an old fool, and both of them are old news. Who cares what they say? They are only hurting their own race by saying their nonsense and , most blacks that are trying to improve themselves, don`t have time for them.
10 posted on 01/16/2003 4:05:34 AM PST by bybybill (it`s just for the children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1; dubyaismypresident; CholeraJoe
honestly, i thought it was an Onion article!
11 posted on 01/16/2003 4:16:01 AM PST by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"Wall Street is built on the backs of African people.

--------------------------

Wall street would exist as it does now regardless of the presence or absence of African people.

12 posted on 01/16/2003 4:16:13 AM PST by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Um, Jesse? Wall Street isn't in Africa.

Um, Jesse? People came to America because they were poor, oppressed, and starving overseas. They got better here.

Um, Jesse? American slaves went from slavery to education and economic success in one generation. If not for the DEMOCRATIC Jim Crow laws, we wouldn't have had the lingering discrimination for a hundred years. But even evil forced segregation caused black businesses, black colleges, and the black community. But the REPUBLICAN supported Civil Rights Act of 1964 ended that.

Still, you're a clever opponent. I like your phrase, "the Trent Lott card".
13 posted on 01/16/2003 4:26:37 AM PST by Forgiven_Sinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
According to a map in "The Historical Atlas of New York City," the "Negroes' Burial Ground" in 18th century NYC was just north of what was then the city common (what is now City Hall Park). That's several blocks north of Wall Street, and outside the financial district.

Don't anybody tell Jesse, but, according to the map of 18th century NYC in Burrows & Wallace, Gotham, the slave market in 18th century NYC was at the far eastern end of Wall Street, just off the East River docks.

14 posted on 01/16/2003 4:30:24 AM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Sounds like the coffers for Operation Push (a.k.a. The First National Bank of, by, and for Jesse Jackson) are starting to get low, so it's time for his Spring shakedown of Wall Street. But what if this year's theme "Wall Street is a slave cemetary" doesn't play with the investors? What next? Will the "Rev. Jackson" try to declare a boycott of this financial institution?

I just hope that this is the year that someone in New York finally takes off the blinders and realizes that, after all these years, the people who've benefitted most from Jess Jackson's Operation Push/Rainbow Coalition is Jesse Jackson and his family.

15 posted on 01/16/2003 4:33:21 AM PST by Exeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
$10 says Jesse Jackass was an FBI Mole when he was with MLK
16 posted on 01/16/2003 4:33:53 AM PST by The Wizard (Demonrats are enemies of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Wizard
Jessie hasn't got enough class to be a FBI mole.
17 posted on 01/16/2003 4:46:17 AM PST by sticker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"The shipping companies were involved in the transportation of slaves. Might they not have a legal obligation going back 200 years? That is what I think," Conyers told CNSNews.com.
Conyers noted that lawsuits against the insurance industry for its alleged profiting from the slave trade were already proliferating. "No one is waiting for [attorney] Johnnie Cochran...people are suing the crap out of them right now," Conyers explained."
___________________________________________________________
The answer to your first question, Mr. Conyers, is a resounding NO!. There is not responsibility that goes back 200 years and you are an idiot to believe that there is.
In response to your second point, they may be suing the crap out of them to use your colorful phrase but they have yet to win a case or to even have any cogent LEGAL arguments. ALL they offer are emotional appeals and skewed history.
You, sir, should take your reparations bill and place it in the hopper....the flushing kind.
18 posted on 01/16/2003 4:48:36 AM PST by Adder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"In 1840, there was more Africans enslaved in New York than there was in Charleston South Carolina," he said. "So if we didn't know all our history, then the conclusion [that blacks deserve reparations] might seem unfair."


And I suspect there was more Serfs in Russia and Prussia than Slaves in America at the time. Russia never gave a cent to the serfs when Tsar Alexander freed them but I think the government did pay the lords that owned the serfs money for their loss of value.

Therefore using 19th Century international actions as a guide it is the decendents of American Slave Owners who deserve reparations, not the slave decendents
19 posted on 01/16/2003 4:48:59 AM PST by Swiss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Last time I checked, there is NOTHING keeping ANYONE from LEAVING this country.........


20 posted on 01/16/2003 4:50:04 AM PST by Elsie (I trust in Jesus... how about you??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson