Replies

A Libertarian believes in individual rights, so long as they don't infringe upon someone else's individual rights.

Oh, that's right.

I forgot, they are the party that has no problem with public beastality so long as the pervert in question owns both the beast and the property it's being screwed on.

Now, do you wish to split any other hairs?

Hence, my self-classification as a Conservative-Libertarian (aka Republican with a mean Libertarian streak). To me, some things are just so morally reprehensible that it could be argued that they are an infringment on another's right to sleep at night! LOL

"I forgot, they are the party that has no problem with public beastality so long as the pervert in question owns both the beast and the property it's being screwed on. "

Why do you always have to bring up Hillery Clinton?

That might be the position of the party but its not classic libertarianism, which allows mature adults to make their own choices and engage in behaviors privately so long as they harm no one. This would not condone bestiality, since the animal is not consenting. A key part of Libertarianism is that the gov't shouldn't be governing states of consciousness (thru punishing drug use) or sexual activity. Now a true libertarian would not approve of drunk driving since it is not responsible.

So your worried about what?
While were dumping on the drug issue. What about the conservative/Republican none stance on our BATF? How does the Alcohol and Tobacco Nazi's figure in the Republican form of limited government?
Next, we will ask about our various government departments of Energy, Education, HUD,EPA and now Home Land Security.
While you gore one ox. You destroy many freedoms.
As a Libertarian I may condem many actions by others. Yet, I will not ask you to pass a law to make be feel better about it. Its sort of like passing a Flag burning law. I served 20 odd years so you and my kid can burn any damm flag they want. On private property of course.
Just because your private ideas don't coincide with others, is not a reason to ask for more government control.
If your driving a SUV and not wearing seat belts while doing drugs and have a fine automatic weapon on your person. Should the government be concerned?
If you should have a accident. Arn't you responsible for damages if found at fault? Why pass another restrictive law.
Republicans are like the farmers who collect my tax money for not growing crops, while complaining about others getting welfare for not working.