Skip to comments.
Gay baths raid slammed -'forces' sex between gays out into the streets and into public view
canoe ^
Posted on 01/11/2003 5:30:12 AM PST by chance33_98
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: chance33_98
Donating to FR will make you this happy!
2
posted on
01/11/2003 5:32:01 AM PST
by
chance33_98
(Praise the Lord and pass the donations!)
To: chance33_98
CALGARY -- A police raid has forced sex between gay men from the confines of a bathhouse out into the streets and in public view, say leaders of Calgary's gay community."I think what you're going to see is an increase in that activity until either the bathhouse is open again or an alternative facility (is introduced)," said Roy Heale, publisher of Calgary's gay magazine, Outlooks.
How about taking it to a hotel/motel/private residence?????
To: ET(end tyranny)
This gives new meaning to the term "coming out of the closet", in this case literally and onto public streets. It's a revealing commentary on the gay community that they don't think they as a group have enough restraint to find a private place to do their thing. Pretty sick if you ask me.
4
posted on
01/11/2003 5:45:50 AM PST
by
Arkie2
To: Arkie2
Restraint, decency, and common sense.
To: chance33_98
Haven't they wanted that kind of public attention all along?
To: chance33_98
And the queers say there is no difference between them and us straight people.
To: ET(end tyranny)
If these freaks think what they are doing to each other is normal then way do they have to hide in a bath house????
8
posted on
01/11/2003 6:05:08 AM PST
by
LetsRok
To: chance33_98
Of course, they have NO CHOICE but to screw in the streets, in front of everyone else.
Didn't the homofascist say the buggers liked the bathhouse because no one they knew would see them?
9
posted on
01/11/2003 6:11:46 AM PST
by
Guillermo
(Sic em')
To: chance33_98
"Safer sex information can be more easily disseminated (at a bathhouse) and there's certain peer pressure to practise safe sex."
Notice the word "safer", not safe. They are lying to themselves.
It has been almost 20 years since we first heard about AIDs. At this point in time, no one should be infected with this desease. We know what it is, and we know how it spreads, and we know how it can be contained.
But as the first polictically correct desease, it is protected. I have to wonder about the sanity of homosexuals.
It is a little like the Democrats. If they would have taken the hit on Bill Clinton, and impeached him, Al Gore would be President today.
If the Homosexual community would have followed standard practices in fighting STD, AIDs would not have gotten as established in the "gay" community as it has.
The homosexuals fought against acts that would have controlled the spread of the desease, and now 20 years later it is still being spread.
I can have sympathy for a fellow human being as they waste away from a desease, but I have no sympathy for "gay" activist who wish to continue down a deadly path, all the while crying society is not doing enough for them.
Living in Northern California with the major newspapers coming out of San Francisco I have read stories where the younger "gay" men upset because they missed out in the golden age of homosexuallity of free sex before AIDs. I have also read that some do not follow safe sex practices because they want to get the desease (for reasons I can not understand). And I have read of stories of "gay" men, once they have AIDs willing to spread the desease (again for reasons I can not understand.)
These are anecdotal stories to be sure, and may not represent the homosexual community at large, but then if you (figuratively) watch the action of "gays" they would seem to be true.
As an observer on life I would have to say, coming out of the closet for "gay" men may have not been the best thing to happen to them, only time will tell.
10
posted on
01/11/2003 6:15:48 AM PST
by
riversarewet
(The rules have changed, it is just some have not yet noticed.)
To: ET(end tyranny)
The homosexual community is marked for it's preference to anonymous sex with multiple partners.
A hotel/motel isn't going to provide the sort of access they prefer.
11
posted on
01/11/2003 6:22:02 AM PST
by
Maelstrom
(Government Limited to Enumerated Powers is your freedom to do what isn't in the Constitution.)
To: riversarewet
>>..I have also read that some do not follow safe sex practices because they want to get the desease (for reasons I can not understand)...<<
I would tend to think that they want it in order to become a sort of martyr.
They already have an indentity crisis if they're attracted to other men. With AIDS they can host a pity party and all their friends will come (er...attend).
To: Maelstrom
Man on man action exposed to the masses!
13
posted on
01/11/2003 6:24:49 AM PST
by
new cruelty
(Where there is a Will (or Todd, Mark, John, David, Tom, RICHARD, or Harry, etc.), there is a way.)
To: chance33_98
I have no personal knowledge of gay bathhouses, but I'm just speculating that they
have to be petri dishes for all kinds of disease...heat, moisture everywhere including the air, exposed mucous membranes--do they use lots of bleach and industrial strength disinfectant in those places?
I just can't imagine even walking into one...
To: chance33_98; MadIvan
I have quite a few gay friends, and wouldn't consider myself in the slightest bit homophobic.
But I find this whole 'bath house' mentality, both disturbing and dangerous.
And are we supposed to feel SORRY for these married gays? I feel sorry for their hood-winked (and dare I say stupid wives) who pick up the STD's they bring home from the bath house.
15
posted on
01/11/2003 6:33:33 AM PST
by
Happygal
To: Happygal
They're trying to have it both ways ---first they say the government can't interfere in any way in their lives, when they get AIDS then they say the government must pay for their medicines and hospitalizations and protect them from job loss etc.
16
posted on
01/11/2003 6:54:54 AM PST
by
FITZ
To: Maelstrom
A hotel/motel isn't going to provide the sort of access they prefer. Why not?
To: chance33_98
I do not want to be that happy(gay).
To: chance33_98
"I think what you're going to see is an increase in that activity until either the bathhouse is open again or an alternative facility (is introduced)," said Roy Heale, publisher of Calgary's gay magazine, Outlooks. Although I have no problem with bathhouses.. (errr...'cept I'd never set foot near one.).... or sex between heteros in such places, for that matter...
.... Don't they have beds in Canada? Bedrooms? Houses?? Apartments? Motels?
To: Arkie2
have enough restraint to find a private place to do their thing Well, the bathhouse was a private place. Which is what is odd.
Why not just put up warning signs on the door, no underage entry, etc.. and let them be?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson