To: Texasforever
For what reason? Lott's timid nature. I can't prove it, but that's what I believe.
And that reason goes in spades for his not appearing without at least clearance.
To: aristeides
Sure, Lott is timid, but that goes hand-in-glove with his other characteristic - an appeaser of the Left... His decision to appear could have been based on THAT instead...
243 posted on
01/10/2003 10:48:12 PM PST by
Chad Fairbanks
(We've got Armadillos in our trousers. It's really quite frightening.)
To: aristeides
And that reason goes in spades for his not appearing without at least clearance. Then for that to make the slightest sense he would still be leading the senate. Logic 101.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson