Skip to comments.
Bush May Enter Affirmative Action Case...
Associated Press
Posted on 01/10/2003 6:25:04 PM PST by RCW2001
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240, 241-260, 261-280 ... 421-429 next last
To: FreeReign
Oh, I thought you said he stabbed us in the back when he went to BET. Did I misunderstand you?
To: TLBSHOW
oh another howlin fan club member arrives, any though about the Affirmative Action Case? Oh BS. You are doing to a fellow freeper what you are claiming Republicans did to Lott i.e. taking words out of context and then telling all what the poster was really thinking. You really need a break.
To: aristeides
Sure, Lott is timid, but that goes hand-in-glove with his other characteristic - an appeaser of the Left... His decision to appear could have been based on THAT instead...
243
posted on
01/10/2003 10:48:12 PM PST
by
Chad Fairbanks
(We've got Armadillos in our trousers. It's really quite frightening.)
To: TLBSHOW
How is she a Jesse Jackson supporter? Because she too may actually be appalled by the way people like Shannon Reeves have been treated?
You know what Reeves should have done? As soon as that white moron assumed he was a porter and asked him to carry his bags or hail a cab, he should have turned around and said, "See my delegate I.D.? I am not your 'boy'. "
To: aristeides
**Myself, I believe Lott went on BET on White House orders. But, if you believe he did not have at least White House clearance to go on BET, I have a bridge to sell you.**
Myself, I believe Lott went on BET on his mother's orders. But, to his credit, he left her gun behind.(;>)
245
posted on
01/10/2003 10:48:17 PM PST
by
auboy
To: TLBSHOW
PROVE IT.
246
posted on
01/10/2003 10:48:34 PM PST
by
Chad Fairbanks
(We've got Armadillos in our trousers. It's really quite frightening.)
To: Fred Mertz
When Lott went to BET, he backstabbed us. But why did it come to that?
Lott's remarks were taken out of context by many people and many interest groups. Lott's remarks were not taken out of context by me, yet he stabbed me in the back with his BET pandering.
247
posted on
01/10/2003 10:48:43 PM PST
by
FreeReign
(keeping everybody's feet to the fire.)
To: aristeides
And that reason goes in spades for his not appearing without at least clearance. Then for that to make the slightest sense he would still be leading the senate. Logic 101.
To: TLBSHOW
Oh sure, Todd. I'm absolutely certain that Lott showed up at Crawford, in this get-up, on White House orders!
Slappin' my knees, funny, you are Todd!
249
posted on
01/10/2003 10:50:57 PM PST
by
A Citizen Reporter
(Ding, dong, dong, ding.......time for the insane to return to the asylum)
To: TLBSHOW
Myself, I believe Lott went on BET on White House orders. But, if you believe he did not have at least White House clearance to go on BET, I have a bridge to sell you. ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR MIND??
250
posted on
01/10/2003 10:51:01 PM PST
by
Mo1
(A PROUD BUSH BOT !!!!)
To: TLBSHOW
after 120 posts of spam in this one thread, including harrassing pings and character assassination of posters who actually have some respect from the community, it's too late for you to pretend that you care about discussion
you didn't post the article and you can't point to one poster in favor of affirmative action--in fact you couldn't cut and paste one statement in favor of it by anyone who signed up more than a year ago
so, now what do you say the purpose of all your dialogue has been?
251
posted on
01/10/2003 10:51:06 PM PST
by
dwills
To: Texasforever
I'm afraid I don't follow your logic. Can you spell it out more clearly?
To: dogbyte12
move away from the monitor long enough to go to church
You think that God is in any of the socialist churchs here in this country then your nuts!
God is where ever you call out his name!
253
posted on
01/10/2003 10:51:28 PM PST
by
TLBSHOW
To: Chad Fairbanks; TLBSHOW
Really? It's truth? Did you hear or see the order to go???? It's CONJECTURE, and not TRUTH... Nice try though.... This is what TLB calls holding Bush's feet to the fire.
254
posted on
01/10/2003 10:51:58 PM PST
by
FreeReign
(keeping everybody's feet to the fire.)
To: FreeReign
Lott's remarks were not taken out of context by me, yet he stabbed me in the back with his BET pandering. I forgave Lott for his remarks. Now, since the Pubbies smacked him down, I've seen the seeds that the Dims have sown coming up. Watch and see. It's already happening.
To: aristeides
Oh, I thought you said he stabbed us in the back when he went to BET. Did I misunderstand you? What he said on BET, he stabbed us in the back.
256
posted on
01/10/2003 10:54:18 PM PST
by
FreeReign
(keeping everybody's feet to the fire.)
To: dwills; TLBSHOW; Howlin
Character assassination? To repeat what you've already seen -- if you're telling the truth about having read this thread -- I was the recipient of Howlin's posting, and TLBSHOW's interpretation of it was, in my opinion, a perfectly reasonable one. I interpreted the posting in precisely the same way.
To: Mo1
aristeides said that originally I just agree!
258
posted on
01/10/2003 10:55:18 PM PST
by
TLBSHOW
To: FreeReign
ROTFL... but the darn detonator aint' working... and now we all smell the sulpher of the matches ;0)
259
posted on
01/10/2003 10:55:40 PM PST
by
Chad Fairbanks
(We've got Armadillos in our trousers. It's really quite frightening.)
To: A Citizen Reporter
It is a ranch!
260
posted on
01/10/2003 10:56:34 PM PST
by
TLBSHOW
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240, 241-260, 261-280 ... 421-429 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson