Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Trajan88
[When I had lunch with Sebesta a week ago at Gloria's in Oak Cliff, I was struck again by two things. Sebesta is hard to understand when he expresses his views. But he makes more sense and sounds more cogent the more effort I invest]

[Thomas B. Edsall of The Washington Post has written and co-authored some of the most influential stories on Trent Lott from 1998 until now. He told me that Sebesta has consistently been an important source during that entire span of time. "He has over the years provided me substantial material that has been very useful." Edsall said he began relying on Sebesta four years ago for stories on Lott's involvement with the Council of Conservative Citizens.]

the reason why Sebesta is hard to understand is that he is probably schizophrenic along the lines of the Unabomber-- thus, you have the Washington Post propagating paranoid delusional material and calling it brilliant.

6 posted on 01/09/2003 7:38:14 PM PST by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: gusopol3
So why didn't Lott's advisor Dick Morris tell him that his words would be used against him? It seems reasonable that as an advisor to Mr. Lott, he could have warned him years ago that keeping company with certain people and voicing some specific words could hurt you. This has been my biggest problem with Mr. Lott, where he sought his advice.
9 posted on 01/09/2003 8:43:28 PM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: gusopol3
the reason why Sebesta is hard to understand is that he is probably schizophrenic along the lines of the Unabomber

I think this is very likely. I read a transcript a while ago of an interview Sebesta did on marxist Pacifica radio. He was ranting and raving as their "expert" on why George W. Bush was inherently a "racist." His arguments were incoherent babble and left wing nonsense, but he had what seemed like the full agreement of the show's two leftist hosts and its other guest, Princeton's James McPherson. For those who don't know this latter name, among those who do not know his marxist political affiliations, McPherson is considered one of the country's leading civil war historians.

Anyway, check out Sebesta's website. If you can wade through all the left wing bullsh*t, you'll find some very wierd motives behind his PC mongering. One theme that he keeps stressing over and over and over again is just plain bizarre - he seems to hate the confederacy because he seems to think it is the root of everything opposed to the radical homosexual agenda he also strongly advocates.

30 posted on 01/11/2003 11:55:45 PM PST by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson