Skip to comments.
Chinese Roots: Skull May Complicate Human-Origins Debate
Science News ^
| 12-21/28-2002
| Bruce Bower
Posted on 01/02/2003 11:03:24 AM PST by blam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
Wolpoff is my guy, he believes as I do..
1
posted on
01/02/2003 11:03:24 AM PST
by
blam
To: RightWhale; JudyB1938; #3Fan; Sabertooth
Ping
2
posted on
01/02/2003 11:04:36 AM PST
by
blam
To: PatrickHenry
ping
3
posted on
01/02/2003 11:10:40 AM PST
by
stanz
To: blam
Looks like Carelton Coon may have been right after all.
4
posted on
01/02/2003 11:23:32 AM PST
by
afz400
To: blam
Well, the Africa firsters will ignore this skull and try to have it banned like the Native Americans in Oregon and Washington with some skulls/bones of non Native Americans found in those two states centuries before the land bridge was to have happened.
These biased non science based histericals, (definitely not historical) will not allow reality to change their isms.
To: afz400
"Looks like Carelton Coon may have been right after all." Yup.
Essay 4
6
posted on
01/02/2003 11:31:58 AM PST
by
blam
To: blam
Have you read "Forbidden Archeology?"
http://www.mcremo.com/fa.htm
The authors state that the origins of man has become politicized, and that any evidence, no matter how weak, is accepted if it bolsters the political theory, and any evidence, no matter how strong, is discredited it it violates the theory.
The book then proceeeds to document every claim, and wishes we will keep these extraneous claims in mind as the next outlying piece of evidence is discovered.
To: Grampa Dave
Yup,
Mungo Man is giving them heartburn also.
8
posted on
01/02/2003 11:39:03 AM PST
by
blam
To: blam
The Out of Africa theory is going the way of Piltown Man...
9
posted on
01/02/2003 11:43:52 AM PST
by
pabianice
To: VadeRetro; jennyp; Junior; longshadow; *crevo_list; RadioAstronomer; Scully; Piltdown_Woman; ...
Ping!
[This ping list for the evolution -- not creationism -- side of evolution threads, and sometimes for other science topics. To be included, or dropped, let me know via freepmail.]
To: blam
Thanks for posting this interesting article.
I thought genetic mapping and analysis showed us with a common African 'Eve', mother to us all?
Isn't that science more compelling than arguable dating of disturbed strata?
I'm just asking? ;^)
To: pabianice
PC science...out of Africa---evoloons parrot all this liberal nonscience!
To: f.Christian
tm...
The evolutionists are going to lose in America and they may end up having to find some other place to peddle their wares. Perhaps Haiti...
1877 posted on 01/01/2003 7:14 AM PST by titanmike
fC...
yeah...papa b rabbit--doc rye---henry---retroll!
To: blam
I seemed to have droped off your ping list, would you please re-add me to the list.
To: blam
Interesting link!
To: PatrickHenry
Thanks for the ping! I'll be very interested in the results of dating the actual specimen.
16
posted on
01/02/2003 12:06:17 PM PST
by
Aracelis
To: blam
Your mungo man link in post #8 is great!
To: headsonpikes
Isn't that science more compelling than arguable dating of disturbed strata?For the present, you are quite correct. However, if age-dating these finds reveals that the specimens were emplaced contemporaneously with surrounding sediments, then we will have to re-think our current theories.
18
posted on
01/02/2003 12:11:27 PM PST
by
Aracelis
To: pabianice
There are some who will continue to believe in the Out of Africa theory, no matter what - just like they still believe Cleopatra was black. So silly.
To: blam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson