Posted on 12/23/2002 9:51:59 AM PST by George Frm Br00klyn Park
CHANGING OF THE GUARD
Frist no friend of gun owners
Candidate for Senate leader has history of anti-firearms support
Posted: December 23, 2002
11:25 a.m. Eastern
By Jon Dougherty
© 2002 WorldNetDaily.com
More questions have arisen about the GOP senator most likely to replace Mississippi Republican Trent Lott as majority leader, this time from gun-rights groups who say he is no friend of the Second Amendment.
According to an analysis posted on firearms rights website KeepandBearArms.com Frist has a poor record of standing up for gun rights.
And Gun Owners of America, a 300,000-member group based in Springfield, Va., has given Frist the grade of "D" in regards to his record of votes regarding gun rights – despite his being a top recipient of donations from the National Rifle Association.
Among Frist's anti-gun votes, he:
• helped kill a filibuster on the Shays-Meehan campaign finance reform bill that conservatives believe squelched the voice of pro-gun groups;
• voted against a filibuster and in favor of sending an anti-gun crime bill to a House-Senate crime committee;
• voted with Democrats to help pass the Lautenberg anti-gun crime bill;
• supported two other gun control proposals.
"Trent Lott has been an unprincipled disaster - the sooner he is made to fall on his sword, the better," wrote David Codrea, a co-founder of Citizens of America, a national gun-rights advertising campaign. "But Bill Frist is a completely unacceptable replacement. Republicans will elect him Senate majority leader at the risk of enraging and alienating the most reliable constituency they have ever had" – gun owners.
Lott resigned Friday, thanking his supporters.
"In the interest of pursuing the best possible agenda for the future of our country, I will not seek to remain as majority leader of the United States Senate for the 108th Congress effective Jan. 6, 2003," he said.
"To all those who offered me their friendship, support and prayers, I will be eternally grateful. I will continue to serve the people of Mississippi in the United States Senate," he added.
Bush praised Lott for his decision.
"It was a very difficult decision Trent made on behalf of the American people," said the president in a statement. "Trent is a valued friend and a man I respect. I am pleased he will continue to serve our nation in the Senate and look forward to working with him on our agenda to make America safer, stronger and better."
Lott faulted himself for the controversy. He said he had fallen into a "trap" set by his political enemies and had "only myself to blame."
The Washington Post reported Monday that Frist is poised to become the first majority leader "elected" by telephone.
Frist, an ally of Bush who is the Senate's only physician, also has a history of backing supporters of other controversial measures that are not palatable to most Republicans, like abortion and stem-cell research.
WorldNetDaily reported Friday that the junior Tennessee senator championed the nomination by President Clinton of former Surgeon General David Satcher, a fervent supporter of unrestricted abortion and someone who actually performed abortions.
And, Frist – a heart surgeon – once told National Public Radio that there are no absolute right, absolute wrong answers in medicine. During last year's stem-cell debate, he proposed using leftover embryos from in-vitro fertilization clinics for scientific research. The Weekly Standard also noted that Frist believes there is a moral imperative to use one unsalvageable life to save another.
Sen. Pete Dominici, R-N.M., threw his support to Frist last week, telling Fox News he wanted to move up a Jan. 6 Republican conference meeting to debate the party's fate and affirm Frist as the party leader.
Virginia's two Republican senators, John Warner and George Allen, backed Frist last week.
Over the weekend, other colleagues praised Frist and said they looked forward to his leadership.
"He personifies not just the rhetoric about idealism but as a life that has been lived," said Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., on Fox News Sunday. "There are actually hands-on examples of how he will make a difference. And I think it's a very exciting prospect."
Frist will "be a different face than what we've had," added Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah. "I'm not criticizing what we've had, but I think Bill has a kind of a more moderate record and a more moderate approach toward things, and I think that it's going to be very difficult to criticize him."
Others predicted Lott's demise would be forgotten soon.
"In the long sweep of American history, this is going to be a blip," Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.
THIS article at WND
BTW, which, precisely, of YOUR 2nd Amendment rights were abrogated by any of the above-mentioned bills?
Michael
JT, Independent parties look better all the time. As the guy said, there's not a dime's bit of difference between the two wings on the same bird of prey. Look for BIG things for medicare! Tenncare sound familiar?? It should. Peace and love, George.
Offer them a deal they can't refuse: Total abortion rights, with the possible exception of practices such as partial birth abortions which could rightly be construed as infantacide, for total gun rights, i.e. the elimination of every law in the land involving firearms other than the 2'nd ammendment.
Take those two poisonous issues straight out of American politics in a single move. The dems don't have any other real issue besides abortion rights; they'd be history along with the whigs and tories in five years.
Frist is most likely another landgrabbing, border opening, soldiers all over the world, establishment flack. I have serious doubts as to whether he's ever seen a copy of the U.S. of A. Constitution, let alone having read it before he took an oath to "Uphold and defend" it. Peace and love, George.
2001: Based on the votes that the Gun Owners of America considered to be the most important in 2001, Senator Frist voted in support of their preferred position 30 percent of the time.
1999: On the votes that the Gun Owners of America considered to be the most important in 1999, Senator Frist voted their preferred position 27 percent of the time.
2001-2002: On the votes that the National Right to Life Committee considered to be the most important in 2001-2002, Senator Frist voted their preferred position 100 percent of the time.
1999-2000: On the votes that the National Right to Life Committee considered to be the most important in 1999-2000, Senator Frist voted their preferred position 100 percent of the time.
1999: On the votes that the National Right to Life Committee considered to be the most important in 1999, Senator Frist voted their preferred position 100 percent of the time.
2001: On the votes that the Conservative Index - The John Birch Society considered to be the most important in 2001, Senator Frist voted their preferred position 90 percent of the time.
2000: On the votes that the Conservative Index - The John Birch Society considered to be the most important in 2000, Senator Frist voted their preferred position 68 percent of the time.
1999: On the votes that the Conservative Index-The John Birch Society considered to be the most important in 1999, Senator Frist voted their preferred position 62 percent of the time.
2001: On the votes that the American Conservative Union considered to be the most important in 2001, Senator Frist voted their preferred position 100 percent of the time.
2000: On the votes that the American Conservative Union considered to be the most important in 2000, Senator Frist voted their preferred position 92 percent of the time.
1999: On the votes that the American Conservative Union considered to be the most important in 1999, Senator Frist voted their preferred position 92 percent of the time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.