Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Muslims denounce U.S. Patriot Act
Globe and Mail ^ | December 22, 2002 | Associated Press

Posted on 12/22/2002 3:03:47 AM PST by billorites

Long Beach, Calif. — The U.S.A. Patriot Act, passed in response to the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, is the biggest threat to democracy in the United States, Muslim leaders and activists said Saturday.

The denunciation at a Muslim-American convention came days after vocal protests were held over the detention of hundreds of Middle Eastern immigrants who voluntarily registered with the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service under new federal guidelines.

Speakers at the Muslim Public Affairs Council convention called on the public to challenge the Patriot Act, which they called an unconstitutional law that violates basic civil liberties.

They also urged the roughly 1,500 people attending the convention to demand the news media provide diverse perspectives on the potential war against Iraq to complement the official U.S. government stand.

"The Patriot Act is the biggest attack on democracy in America right now," council board chairman Omar Ricci said in his opening speech at the two-day annual conference.

The Patriot Act, approved in October of 2001, gave the government new powers to obtain personal information about U.S. citizens and allows the government to detain aliens deemed threats to national security and hold them without public acknowledgment.

It also has given federal law-enforcement agencies greater wiretap authority, access to student and library records and new Internet wiretap powers.

Bryan Sierra, a spokesman for the U.S. Department of Justice, defended the Patriot Act as "an incredibly valuable tool in the war on terrorism."

"Ultimately, the question of civil liberties and what infringes on the Constitution is a matter for the courts to decide," Mr. Sierra said in a telephone interview from Washington.

"But the ultimate goal here is liberty and safety and the security of Americans."

Francisco Arcaute, an INS spokesman in Los Angeles, declined comment Saturday.

Justice Department lawyer Joseph Zogby, who attended the conference, said he would relay the council's concerns about alleged civil rights abuses to the U.S. Attorney-General. He also said the department does not have control over INS policies.

Mr. Zogby, who works in the department's post-Sept. 11 hate crimes investigation division, urged people to register civil rights complaints.

Council board member Gasser Hathout compared the Patriot Act to the Sedition Act of 1789, which made it illegal to criticize president John Adams. He said civil liberties also came under attack in the 1950s from the U.S. House of Representatives Un-American Activities Committee and in the 1960s when the FBI investigated civil rights activists and Vietnam War opponents.

"I'm calling on people not to surrender their civil rights," Mr. Hathout said after a morning panel discussion.

"They are not mutually exclusive things, security or civil rights."

Mr. Hathout said he has statistics showing since the Patriot Act was approved, the number of federal subpoenas of phone and Internet records have been doubling every month and have reached into the thousands.

He also urged the audience not to be cowed into silence about the potential war with Iraq or restrictions on their civil liberties.

Panelist Amy Goodman, a host of the national radio program Democracy Now!, said the public can affect the media's coverage of the war. She recalled a Sally Jessy Raphael talk-show episode she participated in during the Persian Gulf War that was nearly cancelled before callers urged the show's producer to broadcast it.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 12/22/2002 3:03:47 AM PST by billorites
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: billorites; Travis McGee
Hmmm. This creates an internal conflict for me. In general, I have been wary of the Patriot Act, as it appears to give far too much additional power to the FedGov in many areas.

However, if the Musli are agin' it, my knee-jerk reaction is to be for it.

More study required.
2 posted on 12/22/2002 3:19:20 AM PST by FreedomPoster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster
If it makes them squeal, it has appeal.
3 posted on 12/22/2002 3:28:47 AM PST by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: billorites
Here's a curiosity for you...not a peep out of these people when America is attacked and could use some patriotic support. But when whining and demanding are on the table, guess who is loudly bitching on all the airwaves? The duplicitous nature of some of these American muslims is revolting!!
5 posted on 12/22/2002 3:55:39 AM PST by wunderkind54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites
Muslims denounce U.S. Patriot Act.

Imagine this headline:

US Patriots denounce Muslims act.

There, that's better.

6 posted on 12/22/2002 6:47:39 AM PST by OldSmaj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites
Since when are Muslims interested in democracy?
7 posted on 12/22/2002 6:57:50 AM PST by BOOTSTICK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites
While I have some serious issues myself with the Patriot Act, it seems to me that Muslims squealing about this is kinda like the Rats squealing about attempts to clean up election fraud. It cramps their style, which, in both cases, is exactly what it is intended to do.
8 posted on 12/22/2002 7:32:22 AM PST by sweetliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldSmaj
"US Patriots denounce Muslims"

I like it!

9 posted on 12/22/2002 7:34:56 AM PST by sweetliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: billorites
Well, if Muslims are against the Patriot Act, then I am for the Patriot Act.
10 posted on 12/22/2002 7:38:34 AM PST by Momaw Nadon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites
wow it didnt take long to denounce this yet will still wait for their sept 11th condemnation
11 posted on 12/22/2002 7:40:32 AM PST by TheRedSoxWinThePennant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites
Muslims denounce U.S. Patriot Act

I'm so conflicted!!!

12 posted on 12/22/2002 7:49:11 AM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites
Good. Let them denounce it. Must mean it's working.
13 posted on 12/22/2002 7:51:46 AM PST by b4its2late
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites
To imply that communists posed no threat to the U.S. in the 1950s or that there were no spys in the Government in the 1950s is rediculous.

Information found in the Soviet Union files that have been published show that McCarthy was right for the most part. In fact some were exposed that he did not even find nor hint at.

Henry Wallace was Vice President just prior to Truman. If Rousevelt had died just a few months earlier he would have been President. Or if Rousevelt had kept him on the ticket he would have been president. He was a Communist as shown in the information from the Soviet Union.

The present "progressives" still lionize him.

14 posted on 12/22/2002 8:06:42 AM PST by Dan(9698)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites

US PATRIOTS DENOUNCE MUSLIM ACTS!


15 posted on 12/22/2002 8:20:40 AM PST by ROCKLOBSTER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson