Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bud Selig Calls Meeting of All 58 HOF Members-Rose May Have Bet Against Own Team
ESPN/ ABC News Exlcusive ^ | December 21, 2002 | Jim Grey

Posted on 12/21/2002 8:49:40 AM PST by ewing

ESPN just had an exclusive interview with Former Commissioner Fay Vincent and Lead Investigator Matthew Dowd that revealed additional details (above and beyond the linked article) about the lifetime suspension of all time leading hit king Pete Rose from the game of baseball.

The segment said that there was evidence that player/ coach Rose bet against his team when the Cincinnati Reds were playing the San Diego Padres.

The Commissioners office said they didn't have the necessary funds to pursue a proper rundown of that angle of the investigation, and agreed to a lifetime ban from the sport with the world famous batsman provided there was no admission of gambling on the part of Rose.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: allmembers; charliehustle; gambling; halloffame; losangeles; meeting; rose; unprecedented; whatsthespread
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
Shades of MIke Jordan and his gambling escapades..
1 posted on 12/21/2002 8:49:40 AM PST by ewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one; All
Meeting is set for January 17 in Los Angeles
2 posted on 12/21/2002 8:52:22 AM PST by ewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ewing
Pete Rose is a permanent stain on baseball, which is a dying sport anyhow.
3 posted on 12/21/2002 8:54:05 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ewing
It's only sports, thank goodness, and the kids who were susceptible to Rose's hero status saw him banned from the Hall of Fame for his dishonorable behavior. To put him in now is a gesture, an afterthought. Meaningless. Pete Rose in the Hall of Fame is an insult to those who played the game honorably. (Nolan Ryan springs to mind.)

Let the flames begin....
4 posted on 12/21/2002 8:55:18 AM PST by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
I know it is illogical, but I still cant bring myself to believe that Rose bet against his own ballclub.

Betting on his team to win still will get him suspended for life from baseball, but betting against his team is the stuff of federal investigations..

5 posted on 12/21/2002 8:58:37 AM PST by ewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Dog...

I would characterize it as being dead. I gave up baseball when they started paying players millions to take three swings and sit down. Taking a family to the park became prohibitive so I stopped. Have not been in many years and no longer follow the sport.

6 posted on 12/21/2002 8:59:32 AM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou
Charlie Hustle or now 'Hustler,' was one of the most competitive guys on earth when he was playing.. and now the Lead Investigaor says there is evidence that he bet against his own team.

This really is a testimony to the destructive power of gambling.

7 posted on 12/21/2002 9:02:07 AM PST by ewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ewing
Rose and Clinton are two of a kind
Both refuse to admit what they did and still lie about it
8 posted on 12/21/2002 9:02:41 AM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ewing
I think Pete Rose's name should be permitted on the HoF ballot, but only in the first year after his death. His stats have earned his place there, but his scurrilous gambling habit should deprive him of the personal glory the HoF induction would provide.
9 posted on 12/21/2002 9:05:21 AM PST by Petronski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ewing
I can't imagine why Pete Rose would want to repeatedly parade his shameful behaviors in public. Yes, the HOF may be important to him, but obviously not so important to keep him from betting. He is a truly sad character.
10 posted on 12/21/2002 9:05:54 AM PST by FourPeas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uncbob
I;m not even sure an admittance of gambling is enough to get him in the hall now.

My prediction is that Rose is put on the voting ballot to the sportswriters by the comissioner, denied 5 times on the character clause-then admitted into the hall by the veterans committee.

A good Metro sportswriter will never miss a chance to cause some controversy..

11 posted on 12/21/2002 9:07:57 AM PST by ewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
Interesting take.
12 posted on 12/21/2002 9:09:31 AM PST by ewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: Petronski
I think Pete Rose's name should be permitted on the HoF ballot, but only in the first year after his death. His stats have earned his place there, but his scurrilous gambling habit should deprive him of the personal glory the HoF induction would provide.

The problem, here, is that the banning is not just a punishment for Pete Rose, but also a deterrant to every other player who comes after.

Keeping Pete Rose out Baseball and out of the Hall of Fame has been the most honorable thing that has occurred in Baseball in decades. It's the one standard that hasn't been eroded.




14 posted on 12/21/2002 9:18:39 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ewing; Victoria Delsoul; bootless; BluesDuke; rockfish59; mrustow; rdb3; John R. (Bob) Locke; ...
((((((growl)))))



15 posted on 12/21/2002 9:19:22 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ewing
Absolutely no way Pete Rose should ever be allowed back into baseball, nor the Hall of Fame. He bet on baseball, which is explicitly banned, and for which the consequences (banishment and ineligibility for the HOF) are plainly written. We have rules, and he broke them, and must pay the ultimate price. Adultery, racism, wife beating, and just be a jerk, are not something that rules bans a player for, so this "everyone did something bad" crap is just b.s.

People forget that gambling almost destroyed baseball with the Black Sox scandal. That's why the penalty is so harsh.

If after 80 years, Shoeless Joe Jackson isn't in, then Rose should stay out as well (and that's not a plea to let Jackson in). Too bad, so sad.

16 posted on 12/21/2002 9:19:59 AM PST by GreatOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

"The banishment for life of Pete Rose from baseball is the sad end of a sorry episode. One of the game's greatest players has engaged in a variety of acts which have stained the game, and he must now live with the consequences of those acts. By choosing not to come to a hearing before me, and by choosing not to proffer any testimony or evidence contrary to the evidence and information contained in the report of the Special Counsel to the Commissioner, Mr. Rose has accepted baseball's ultimate sanction, lifetime ineligibility."

Statement by then Commissioner of Baseball
A. Bartlett Giamatti
August 24, 1989

The Dowd Report

17 posted on 12/21/2002 9:36:37 AM PST by SMEDLEYBUTLER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ewing
Did Jordan ever bet on basketball? I have never heard that accusation before - or are you comparing his casino gambling with betting on the sport you are playing?
18 posted on 12/21/2002 9:42:41 AM PST by TheOtherOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheOtherOne
Jordan's two-year retirement during his foray into minor-league baseball was a thinly disguised suspension.

David Stern had the goods on Jordan, enough to ban him for life. But banning the NBA's greatest asset could have brought down the league.

There really is a double standard for the top stars in any sport. Had Pete Rose been a marginal Hall of Fame candidate, this discussion wouldn't be happening at all.
19 posted on 12/21/2002 10:02:11 AM PST by Loyalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth

20 posted on 12/21/2002 10:02:38 AM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson