Free Republic Browse · Search News/Activism Topics · Post Article

Simple Analogy of Current Tax System (for your liberal friends)
email

Posted on 12/13/2002 1:15:53 PM PST by Sir Gawain

This is a VERY simple way to understand the tax laws. Read on - it does make you think!!

Let's put tax cuts in terms everyone can understand.

Suppose that every day, ten men go out for dinner.

The bill for all ten comes to \$100.

If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this.

The first four men -- the poorest -- would pay nothing;

The fifth would pay \$1:

the sixth would pay \$3;

the seventh \$7;

the eighth \$12;

The ninth \$18.

The tenth man -- the richest -- would pay \$59.

That's what they decided to do.

The ten men ate dinner in the restaurant every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement -- until one day, the owner threw them a curve.

"Since you are all such good customers," he said, "I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily meal by \$20."

So now dinner for the ten only cost \$80.

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes.

So the first four men were unaffected.

But what about the other six -- the paying customers?

How could they divvy up the \$20 windfall so that everyone would get his "fair share?"

The six men realized that \$20 divided by six is \$3.33.

But if they subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would end up being *paid* to eat their meal.

So the restaurant owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.

And so the fifth man paid nothing, the sixth pitched in \$2, the seventh paid \$5, the eighth paid \$9, the ninth paid \$12, leaving the tenth man with a bill of \$52 instead of his earlier \$59.

Each of the six was better off than before.

But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings.

"I only got a dollar out of the \$20," declared the sixth man.

He pointed to the tenth. "But he got \$7!"

"Yeah, that's right," exclaimed the fifth man.

"I only saved a dollar, too.

It's unfair that he got seven times more than me!"

"That's true!" shouted the seventh man.

"Why should he get \$7 back when I got only \$2?

The wealthy get all the breaks!"

"Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison.

"We didn't get anything at all.

The system exploits the poor!"

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night he didn't show up for dinner, so the nine sat down and ate without him.

But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important.

They were \$52 short!

And that, boys and girls, journalists and college instructors, is how the tax system works.

The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction.

Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up at the table anymore.

Unfortunately, some cannot grasp this straight-forward logic!

TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: liberaldinner
Forwarded email. This may have been posted before. Not sure the search term to use.
1 posted on 12/13/2002 1:15:53 PM PST by Sir Gawain

To: AAABEST; christine; Darth Sidious; Fiddlstix; fporretto; Free Vulcan; Liberty Teeth; Loopy; ...
-
2 posted on 12/13/2002 1:16:30 PM PST by Sir Gawain

To: Sir Gawain
bump ... good analogy
3 posted on 12/13/2002 1:17:16 PM PST by Centurion2000

To: Centurion2000
Oops. I found a previous post. Ah well.
4 posted on 12/13/2002 1:18:06 PM PST by Sir Gawain

To: Sir Gawain
I like the simplicity of the analogy. Thanks.
5 posted on 12/13/2002 1:20:13 PM PST by Faith

To: Sir Gawain
Here is something similar.

DEMOCRATIC DISTRIBUTION ON WEALTH AT A BASEBALL GAME

Democrats think this is a fair distribution of wealth:

50,000 people go to a baseball game; but the game was rained out and a refund was due. The team was about to send out refunds when the Democrats stopped them and suggested that they send out refund amounts based on the democratic interpretation of fairness. After all, if the refunds were made equally to the people who paid for the tickets, most of the money would go to the top 2%.

The Democratic plan says:

People in the \$10 seats will get back \$15, because they have less money to spend. People in the \$15 seats will get back \$15, because that's only fair. People in the \$25 seats will get back \$1, because they already make a lot of money. People in the \$50 luxury seats will have to pay another \$15, because they have so much to spend. And the people driving by the stadium who couldn't afford to watch the game will get \$10 each, even though they didn't pay anything in, because they need the most help
6 posted on 12/13/2002 1:21:01 PM PST by Badger1

To: Sir Gawain
Worth repeating.
7 posted on 12/13/2002 1:23:55 PM PST by RAY

To: Sir Gawain
great post! Might add a bit in there about the rich man saying "To hell with it!" and moving his money offshore.
8 posted on 12/13/2002 1:23:58 PM PST by lelio

To: Sir Gawain
I know a guy that "retired" upon hearing the news that G.H.W. Bush was renigging on his "Read my lips" promise.

| He's still retired and still paying some taxes, but he's paying nothing like the taxes he was paying fifteen years ago.

9 posted on 12/13/2002 1:26:10 PM PST by thinktwice

To: Faith
This is the general plot to Atlas Shrugged.
10 posted on 12/13/2002 1:29:54 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants

To: lelio
That's my plan in a few years!
11 posted on 12/13/2002 1:30:43 PM PST by xrp

To: Sir Gawain
Here's another simple analogy for you. (If only it were really this simple to educate young idealistic, liberal, misguided college students)

This puts the argument of democrat vs. republican in terms most of us can understand.

There was a young teenage girl that was about to finish her first year of college. She considered herself to be a very liberal Democrat and her father was a rather staunch conservative Republican.

One day she was challenging her father on his beliefs and his opposition to programs like welfare, a large benevolent government, and rich-to-poor tax equalization.

He stopped her and asked her how she was doing in school. She answered that she had a 4.0 GPA but it was really tough. She had to study all the time, never had time to go out and party and often went sleepless because all of the studying. She didn't have time for a boyfriend and didn't really have many college friends because of all her studying.

He then asked how her friend Mary, that was attending the same college, was doing. She replied that she was barely getting by. She had a 2.0 GPA, never studied, was very popular on campus and was at parties all the time. She often wouldn't show up for classes because she was hung over.

He then asked his daughter why she didn't go to the Dean's office and ask why she couldn't take 1.0 off her 4.0 and give it to her friend that only had a 2.0. That way they would both have a 3.0 GPA.

She fired back and said "that wouldn't be fair, I worked really hard for mine and my friend has done nothing".

After a moment of silence, she replied, "I guess I will never vote Democrat again".
12 posted on 12/13/2002 1:33:10 PM PST by VRWCmember

To: Sir Gawain
Thanks for the Ping
Great Post
13 posted on 12/13/2002 1:34:25 PM PST by Fiddlstix

To: Sir Gawain
bump
14 posted on 12/13/2002 1:40:58 PM PST by VRW Conspirator

To: Sir Gawain
bump
15 posted on 12/13/2002 2:24:26 PM PST by danneskjold

To: Sir Gawain
bump
16 posted on 12/13/2002 2:58:29 PM PST by LiteKeeper

To: Sir Gawain
Bumpity-bump!
17 posted on 12/13/2002 3:02:22 PM PST by alley cat

To: Sir Gawain
I have liberal friends?
18 posted on 12/13/2002 4:39:24 PM PST by weikel

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

 Free Republic Browse · Search News/Activism Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794