Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: joesnuffy
Lobotomy?

Don't tell me you are one of those who listens to the Pat Buchanan crowd...

For his time, Mohammed was a rather peaceful man, and he was warred against more than the warrior.
10 posted on 12/09/2002 8:17:26 AM PST by republicanwizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: republicanwizard
MURDER BY ISLAM THE CULT OF DEATH


In a little-noticed story almost exactly one year after Muslims staged the most horrific terrorist attack the world has ever seen, a Muslim en route from Germany to Kosovo emerged from the airplane bathroom and tried to strangle a stewardess with his shoelaces. (Not that there's anything unpeaceful about that.)

That story was squirreled away in a small box at the very bottom of Page A-9 of the Times. In the entire Lexis-Nexis archives, only three newspapers reported the incident. Not one mentioned that the attacker was a Muslim. It was a rather captivating story, too. Earlier in the flight, the Muslim responded to the stewardess' offer of refreshments by saying, "I'd like to drink your blood." (Not that there's anything unpeaceful about that.)

Also last week, another practitioner of the Religion of Peace, this one with ties to al-Qaida, tried to board a plane in Switzerland with a gun. This story did not merit front-page coverage at the New York Times.

On July 4 this year, an Egyptian living in California – who had complained about his neighbors flying a U.S. flag, had a "Read the Koran" sticker on his front door, and expressed virulent hatred for Jews – walked into an El Al terminal at the Los Angeles airport and started shooting Jews. (Not that there's anything unpeaceful about that.)

The Times casually reported the possibility that his motive was a fare dispute. Four days after the shooting, the story vanished amid an embarrassed recognition of the fact that any Muslim could snap at any moment and start shooting.


snip;

Citing passages from the Hadith, the collected sayings of Muhammad, the Caners note that, by his own account, the founder of Islam was often possessed by Satan. The phrase "Satanic Verses" refers to words that Muhammad first claimed had come from God, but which he later concluded were spoken by Satan.

Muhammad married 11 women, kept two others as concubines and recommended wife-beating (but only as a last resort!). His third wife was 6 years old when he married her and 9 when he consummated the marriage.

To say that Muhammad was a demon-possessed pedophile is not an attack. It's a fact. (And for the record, Timothy McVeigh is not the founder of Christianity. He wasn't even a Christian. He was an atheist who happened to be a gentile.)

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/anncoulter/ac20020906.shtml

14 posted on 12/09/2002 8:29:03 AM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: republicanwizard
Mohammed was a rather peaceful man

muhammad was a paedophile, in his fifties he married a 6 year old girl and defiled her at age 9.

That was one of his better points as he's also the founder of an insane satanic murdeous cult, islam.

islam is death, and will have to be eradicated.

19 posted on 12/09/2002 9:09:56 AM PST by Abar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: republicanwizard
Mohammed was a rather peaceful man<---Republican Wizard aka Achmed Abdulla Fullacrapolla. Man you been smoking to much camel dung. Peaceful my ass.
37 posted on 12/09/2002 12:22:34 PM PST by Delbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: republicanwizard
For his time, Mohammed was a rather peaceful man, and he was warred against more than the warrior.

Too late for that argument as you've already called it a fairy tale.

147 posted on 12/15/2002 11:06:39 PM PST by Rightwing Conspiratr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: republicanwizard
I disagree with Pat Buchanan quite a bit. I have never supported him, nor would I. I've voted for Bush three times now in my life. Islam is NOT a religion of peace. Not all who practice it are terrorists, they just tolerate/quietly support the terrorists.
232 posted on 12/16/2002 1:30:23 PM PST by Republic of Texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: republicanwizard
republicanwizard signed up 2002-11-18.

nuff said!

238 posted on 12/16/2002 1:48:12 PM PST by MatthewViti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: republicanwizard
You said...."For his time, Mohammed was a rather peaceful man, and he was warred against more than the warrior."

I say.......Nonsense. You do not know history. Mohammed was a terorist plain & simple. He killed because no one wanted him as their leader. NO body believed him. He was one of the most despicable people in all of history. His evil empire of religious fanatics are still a pox on the world today.

Mohammed was

a pedophile--he had a 9 year old wife.

a drug taking epileptic whose bablings were written down by religous fanatics.

Confused--there are many conflicting bablings that Mohammed expoused in the Quran (Koran).

Dangerous. He went on many attacks of Christians and killed many himself enjoying the experiance.

A religion of peace my behind. Why is it that so many use the Quran and the surahs as a document to inflict terror on the world? It is because the Quran is ......evil!

281 posted on 12/16/2002 10:45:35 PM PST by Radioactive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson