.
1 posted on
12/08/2002 7:19:56 AM PST by
stoney
To: stoney
Legally, they may not be due the medical care. However, it would seem the government (us) would be liable for some type of compensation and punitive damages for the misinformation and lies under which they enlisted. But, at this point, where does one go for redress of this grievance?
It seems, somewhere in that mass of past judgments and rulings, a really dedicated lawyer could find something that could use to turn this around or maybe someone in congress could tack it onto another bill at least to cover the affected vets and any true dependants.
2 posted on
12/08/2002 7:33:56 AM PST by
RAY
To: stoney
OK, there are sour grapes contained in this response - but:
Considering the number of private enterprise workers who have in the past few years had their promised medical coverage jerked from retirement - what's the big deal when it happens to retired military?
I figure my formal retirement will just about cover medical insurance for two and a carton of smokes each month. (note the irony)
Retired military, following a second career on the outside, are making a whole lot more'n I will every month from two different commercial plans. Unless it is clearly a military related problem (ie, wounds) this seems to me to be no more or less than equality with the rest of us.
3 posted on
12/08/2002 8:11:20 AM PST by
norton
To: stoney
Gosh. Military recruiters lied. So what? From personal experience I can tell you that unless it is a written contract as part of your enlistment, anything you are told when enlisting is crap. Period. It doesn't matter how many people where told. It doesn't matter over how many years people were told. Unless it is actually
written in contractual language as part of the enlistment papers, it doesn't (legally) exist.
As many, many, many enlistees have found over the years.
Also, even if you have something in writing, they can always change their minds and change the policy later. Which can be and has been done retroactively. So you can even be given a document in writing, and they can change a policy later, and you can be screwed. Too bad. Its legal, and it happens.
BOHICA.
5 posted on
12/08/2002 10:27:05 AM PST by
dark_lord
To: stoney
Even if the Congress had promised there is no obligation here since all expendatures by the federal government are subject to appropriations. There is no such thing as a government "contract" which originates in Congressional "promises." Social Security is not a contract. It can be abolished at any time.
7 posted on
12/08/2002 1:02:04 PM PST by
Demidog
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson