Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PHOTOGRAPHER ARRESTED FOR TAKING PICTURES OF VICE PRESIDENT'S HOTEL
2600 Magazine ^ | 5 Dec 2002 06:03:48 UTC | 2600

Posted on 12/07/2002 11:59:26 AM PST by FreedomCalls

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: Diverdogz
I will NEVER give up my right to use my camera on a public street.

I don't necessarily disagree with you, but the USSS has always been pretty touchy where the Pres or VP is concerned. Back when Slick Willie was Pres, a local radio personality went to stand outside a Clinton appearance in our city with a "Clinton Sucks" sign. That's it, just holding the sign near the entrance to the location of the appearance. As he was taping, you could hear an agent approach him and say, "You're not gonna hold that up here" almost in the tone of a question. The radio guy said, "No, I guess not," and left with his sign.

You want to protest, take photos, do whatever, go ahead, but the fact is that around the Pres and VP, they don't screw around.

41 posted on 12/07/2002 2:48:48 PM PST by Trailerpark Badass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black
But standing in the open and taking notes or pictures on a public street is NOT an activity that may be regulated by any level of government.

Every city, town and village have several catch all laws that allow an officer to arrest anyone just because the cops wants to arrest someone. There are crimes like interfering with an officer in the performance of his duty. He tells you to do something or not do something and you disobey. There are a whole series of crimes dealing with being in the area where a president or vice president is located. They were passed after the Kennedy killing. They are federal law and they are tough. But even if the Vice President was not in the area cops can arrest you if they want to do so. They also have the right to lie to you and take anything you have in your possession for evidence. The supreme court has said they don't have to return it until the case is closed. Guess who gets to say when the case is closed?

The Constitution is what ever 5 supreme court justices say it is. And they say it is constitutional for cops to enforce such laws. The supreme court has even ruled it is legal for cops to lie to you. It is NOT legal for you to lie to them.

Every city, town, and even most villages have a law called loitering. To be guilty of loitering all you have to do is hang around one building or location for more than a couple of minutes.

If you are found loitering on a public street or in a public building, you can be arrested. Loitering is a nice legal way cop can take you down for doing nothing at all. I you don't have press credentials, they will nail you for loitering. If you resist they will charge you with resisting arrest. If you do more than passive resisting you will be charged with assaulting a law offerer. If you resist with anything other than your bare hands, you will be charged with assault with a lethal weapon. It will be your word against 5 cops.

Have you ever noticed that it is public officials who get to pass the laws that give power to public officials?

Don't forget to yell in the cops face the constitution says he can't do this to you.


42 posted on 12/07/2002 2:57:06 PM PST by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Diverdogz
I will NEVER give up my right to use my camera on a public street.

YOU are missing the point. He admitted that he was taking pictures of security, ie Sharpshooters and police lines. Only an idiot would proke the USSS. He knew what he was doing and knew the consequences. Nothing dangerous about recognizing stupidity. Take your digital and try and take a pic of Andrews AFB, or the Wash Navy Yard, and you will have some explaining to do if you are caught.....and those rules have been in place long before 9/11. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

43 posted on 12/07/2002 2:58:16 PM PST by cardinal4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
All we have is this fools word, and he couldn't even get the names of the cops involved.

Cops hide their names and badge numbers nowdays.

When they aren't covering their faces and stomping little kittens to death on goons squad house raids, that is.

But then, you knew that...

44 posted on 12/07/2002 3:19:07 PM PST by DAnconia55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: HighWheeler
An officer doesn't need to push a guy to the ground to arrest him unless he is running or putting up direct physical resistance

Bwhahahahahah... ok.

45 posted on 12/07/2002 3:19:55 PM PST by DAnconia55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black
Bump correct post #27....
46 posted on 12/07/2002 3:21:45 PM PST by DAnconia55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: agitator
Interesting conversation. Troubling content. Good questions from the call-ins.
47 posted on 12/07/2002 3:59:51 PM PST by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: July 4th
The guy got mad because there was no toilet paper.
48 posted on 12/07/2002 4:03:12 PM PST by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley
I agree, something just doesn't ring true with this story. We get the Denver TV stations on Dish Network and there was nary a word about this.
Maybe someone is pulling our leg!
49 posted on 12/07/2002 10:14:13 PM PST by Rancher_jean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Propaganda, not propaganda, lefty, not a lefty, total lie, partial lie...or truth. I have no idea and would like more information and some type of documentation from a credible 3rd party; not the government and not the man accusing them. Wouldn't you?
50 posted on 12/07/2002 10:17:52 PM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: agitator
Thanks. I'll review it over the weekend.
51 posted on 12/07/2002 10:21:12 PM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson