Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Study: GOP to dominate for generation
WND ^ | December 4, 2002 | Jon Dougherty

Posted on 12/03/2002 11:15:57 PM PST by gubamyster

ELECTION 2002

Pollster's data point to major sea change in American politics

Posted: December 4, 2002 1:00 a.m. Eastern

By Jon Dougherty © 2002 WorldNetDaily.com

The mid-term elections of 2002 reflect a sea change in American electoral politics in which the Republican Party will dominate for a generation, says a prominent pollster.

Republicans' precedent-setting victories Nov. 5 were "much more than President Bush getting out the vote in close Senate races," says an analytical introduction to "The GOP Generation," on the website of its author, pollster Scott Rasmussen.

"Building upon proprietary survey data … [the report] explains underlying issues, trends and other factors moving the nation to a lasting Republican majority," said the analysis.

A couple of factors – national security and the war on terror – no doubt favored Bush and Republicans generally during the midterm elections. But Rasmussen told WorldNetDaily that other "institutional" changes were taking place that could lead the Grand Old Party into majority status for years to come, such as shifts in demographics and workplace habits.

And, data indicate, the president is playing excellent politics. For example, Democrats sought to capitalize on a sagging U.S. economy by blaming Bush and Republicans for a series of corporate scandals that allegedly sapped investor and consumer confidence. But Bush and the GOP instead were able to successfully counter those charges by tying victorious prosecution of the war on terror as one way to rebuild investor and consumer confidence. Since Republicans have traditionally fared better in matters of national security, the gambit worked.

"Quite frankly, most Americans are closer to Bush's view, so it's been a unifying factor for Republicans," Rasmussen said. "One of the surprises in the data … was that the economy and war issues were intertwined, almost as a single issue. As international tensions rose, the economy suffered, so one of the best economic policies for the president to follow was to focus on national security problems."

Still, Rasmussen said there are some potential problems for the new Republican majority in the future that will have to be finessed for the party to remain in control.

"I think the immigration issue is a potential explosive issue within the Republican majority," he said.

Many Republicans favor strict border enforcement, reduced immigration and using U.S. troops to patrol the border. Others, including Bush, support granting amnesty to illegal immigrants and the establishment of temporary work permits for Mexican nationals seeking employment in the U.S.

Also, making inroads with minority voters remains a focus of the party, though conservatives fear that effort will lead to promises of new spending on old social programs.

Nevertheless, while admitting that "nothing is automatic," Rasmussen said the data show that "if Bush does well in the next two years, it's very difficult to envision a scenario where Democrats win back control of the House or Senate anytime soon."

"What I see is that because of the performance of the president in the past couple of years, the Republicans are now truly a majority party, and it's a lot deeper than I or other analysts first thought," said Rasmussen.

There are also nationwide trends that support a widening GOP base. Besides controlling the U.S. House and Senate, Republicans also now control most governorships and state legislatures as well.

"That hasn't happened all up and down the line since Hoover was in office," said the pollster.

Before losing its majority in the 1994 midterm elections, Democrats controlled the House for 40 years.

Other factors hint at a longstanding Republican majority, the data indicate. For one, institutions that have traditionally favored the GOP are growing.

"The number of self-employed people is rising," Rasmussen said, "and traditionally that group has been solidly Republican, just as unions have traditionally been solidly Democratic."

Recent data suggests union numbers are shrinking, and though minority groups tend to favor the Democrats, some surveys after the Nov. 5 election showed that Republicans made greater-than-expected gains among minority voters.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: republican; republicans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

1 posted on 12/03/2002 11:15:57 PM PST by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: gubamyster; Grampa Dave
I love this report!
2 posted on 12/03/2002 11:32:51 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster
Which GOP is this? The report can not be talking about the current GOP, the one in control of DC, the one that loves illegals from Mexico and H1B visa holders, the one that keeps their mouth shut when GOP govs raise taxes instead of cutting goverment.

That GOP? If they don't start doing what they preach they do not stand a chance.
3 posted on 12/03/2002 11:57:44 PM PST by Karsus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster
It is my hope that Scott Rasmussen is CORRECT in this prediction.

I do recall, however, that for Nov. 2000, he missed the mark. He predicted Bush by a few percentage points, and he was wrong.
4 posted on 12/04/2002 12:05:40 AM PST by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster
This should be enough to send my sister the Democrat looking for a bridge to jump from. I think she just now took her head out of the oven from the election results in Nov.
5 posted on 12/04/2002 12:11:22 AM PST by Clintons Are White Trash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truth_seeker
Rasmussen blew it big in 2000.

That being said, some leftist authors just wrote a book proclaiming a new democrat majority for a generation using the 2000 elections. Boy were they wrong.

However, if one looks at the last 22 years, its clear that the Republicans have turned the corner and the democrats are back to 1984.

6 posted on 12/04/2002 12:17:51 AM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Clintons Are White Trash
"if Bush does well in the next two years, it's very difficult to envision a scenario where Democrats win back control of the House or Senate anytime soon." ... What I see is that because of the performance of the president in the past couple of years, the Republicans are now truly a majority party, and it's a lot deeper than I or other analysts first thought,"

Whee haw !!! Rasmussen Rocks! I personally don't think it is solely due to the performance of the president, though.

This should be enough to send my sister the Democrat looking for a bridge to jump from

This looks like it, alright. My liberal friendsacquaintances are just starting to get the courage to get their heads out of the sand (so they can listen to 'Toon's newest advice) and along comes this from Scott. Everyone likes to make a big deal about his missing the 2000 results (due to his missing the fraud and dirty tricks effect energizing the liberals), but he is still one of the best assayers of the pulse of America. I like hearing this from him. I wish I could see spending the $45 to buy this report.

7 posted on 12/04/2002 12:45:39 AM PST by AFPhys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster
Before losing its majority in the 1994 midterm elections, Democrats controlled the House for 40 years

I think the Pubbie majority has more to do with Clinton then with Bush--primarily a delayed reaction to the sleaze. I think many who did not want to acknollege Rat corruption while Clinton was POTUS, are acknolleging it now. I suppose what old Abe said still applies today:

"But You can't fool all of the people all of the time"

8 posted on 12/04/2002 2:00:39 AM PST by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thud
ping
9 posted on 12/04/2002 3:49:51 AM PST by Dark Wing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster
I was excited about this thread! Then I saw it came from World Net Daily.....

Since it's from them, I can only assume it's propaganda. Sigh...
10 posted on 12/04/2002 5:40:08 AM PST by Johnny Shear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Johnny Shear

Well, no, WND isn't actually the source, Scotty Rasmussen is. He is slowly trying to recover his credibility from his disastrous outing in 2000. This time he has some breathing room, as his competitor, Zogby, tanked in so many races.

Let us wait until 2004 to see how Bush does and how the Pubbies do in Congress. Meantime, we get to stock the appellate courts for the next generation in the next two years.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

11 posted on 12/04/2002 5:46:15 AM PST by section9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Karsus
"Which GOP is this? The report can not be talking about the current GOP, the one in control of DC, the one that loves illegals from Mexico and H1B visa holders, the one that keeps their mouth shut when GOP govs raise taxes instead of cutting goverment."

Yup. That'd be the one. P. J. O'Rourke was right when he said, "Democrats say government can make you richer, smarter, taller and get the chickweed out of your lawn. Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work, and then they get elected and prove it."

12 posted on 12/04/2002 7:23:06 AM PST by sheltonmac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: truth_seeker; Poohbah; Miss Marple; Mudboy Slim; JohnHuang2; daviddennis; section9; Howlin; ...
I think this is close to the mark. Keep in mind, there was a LOT of Rat fraud in 2000 (St. Louis, Philly, Palm Beach and Broward Counties), and the NAALCP went all out for Gore in `00.

But the "special sauce" was off this time.

I think Rasmussen is correct about the one major land mine the GOP is facing. But I think it is managable.
13 posted on 12/04/2002 9:45:41 AM PST by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster
Also, making inroads with minority voters remains a focus of the party, though conservatives fear that effort will lead to promises of new spending on old social programs.

Is this an insinuation that the only way to appeal to minority voters is to buy 'em?

If that's true, that doesn't speak well of minority voters...

14 posted on 12/04/2002 9:50:46 AM PST by maxwell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truth_seeker
"I do recall, however, that for Nov. 2000, he missed the mark. He predicted Bush by a few percentage points, and he was wrong."

Was Rasmussen's prediction made before or after the Dubyuh DUI story broke?!

FReegards...MUD

15 posted on 12/04/2002 10:01:09 AM PST by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mudboy Slim
I think it was before - he didn't do polling on weekends, IIRC. I'm not sure.

But then again, everyone underestimated the depths to which Gore would sink to.
16 posted on 12/04/2002 10:22:49 AM PST by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mudboy Slim; hchutch
He also didn't poll the metabolically challenged in St. Louis and Chicago. Gotta have a representative sample, dontcha know!
17 posted on 12/04/2002 10:24:21 AM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Don't confuse opportunity with inevitability.
18 posted on 12/04/2002 10:25:12 AM PST by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Huh? "Metabolically challenged"?

Dontcha mean DEAD?
19 posted on 12/04/2002 10:27:00 AM PST by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
Please! "Dead" is such a...perjorative term, one that might hurt their self-esteem, and continue their oppression by the metabolically favored.
20 posted on 12/04/2002 10:28:50 AM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson