Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cebadams
From my limited knowledge of this subject, combined with my extensive technical background, I can come up with a few things that make sense.

The sensor in the missile head would need a hot spot to lock on to. It would not have found one if it approached from the side or from directly below. The missile would have hit hot air.

It would need to come in from the rear to get a good lock. Modern commercial engines are high efficiency, as thus do not have as pretty of a heat signature, so this further complicates matters.

Due to the speed of the missile, if it were fired too close to the aircraft it likely would not be able to lock in and make the turn to come in from the back unless it were fired from just the right angle.

From what I know of defense systems, something needs to trigger it. A active radar source would be one type trigger, but a the airport, that would be a common occurrence. The system would not work, (unless you want flares and chaff spewing all over the place. The other trigger is manual. A plane taking off would not likely be able to sense a missile on approach. Particularly one with only a heat sensor and no radar guidance.

The strobe idea might work, but it would need to be turned on all the time. It would also be a visible mod to the aircraft.

I do not buy this evasive hardware story.

The idiots just plain missed again. That's all.

110 posted on 11/30/2002 7:32:57 AM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: wirestripper
The other scenario that is even more likely is that the claim of a missile attack was fabricated. It never happened.
116 posted on 11/30/2002 1:02:02 PM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

To: wirestripper
There are several IR jammers that stay on and can confuse all but the most recent series of IR seekers. A commcerical aircraft could have several mounted without much to notice. Not that I know this aircraft had one, and it might have, but they would be a good countermeasure in the flat lands.
117 posted on 11/30/2002 2:55:25 PM PST by PatrioticAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson