Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Plans New Agency to Dole Out Billions in Aid
Reuters ^

Posted on 11/25/2002 8:43:37 PM PST by RCW2001

Nov. 25

— By Adam Entous

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Bush plans to create a new government agency to dole out billions of dollars in foreign aid, forcing the world's poorest countries to compete against one another if they want a share, administration officials said on Monday.

Strict conditions would be set for countries to qualify under the so-called Millennium Challenge Account program aimed at rewarding cash-strapped governments that embrace civil rights, root out corruption, open up their markets and adopt other policies favored by Washington.

Taking on critics who say the United States does not provide its fair share of foreign aid, Bush has promised $5 billion a year for the new program starting in fiscal 2006. Money would begin to flow in the fiscal 2004 budget, which will be unveiled in February, but officials said the dollar amounts for 2004 and 2005 have yet to be set.

The money would be in addition to the roughly $10 billion the United States distributes each year for foreign development assistance or $17 billion counting security funds.

"The evidence shows that when official development assistance is put into a policy environment that is a bad one, it's not just ineffective, it's downright harmful. It perpetuates bad policies, it perpetuates misery and it crowds out private capital," a senior administration official said.

In contrast, the official said, when foreign aid is directed to countries with sound policies, private capital increases, helping to boost economic growth and fight poverty.

At a U.N. development conference in March, Bush touted the program as part of the U.S.-led war against terrorism, and put his advisers to work hammering out the details.

Under Bush's plan, the Millennium Challenge Account would be rolled out in phases over the next three years.

In fiscal 2004, the world's poorest countries, including Haiti, Nepal and Ghana, could compete for assistance.

The number of eligible countries would expand in the second and third years as program resources grow to a total of $5 billion annually.

Once fully phased in, the Philippines, Jordan, Thailand, Peru and more than 100 other countries could compete for foreign aid, but administration officials expect just 10 to 20 to receive assistance each year under the program.

COUNTRIES RANKED

To win a share of the resources, countries would be ranked based on 16 separate "performance indicators," from civil rights to spending on public health and education.

A country's' "economic freedom" would be judged on its credit rating, inflation, budget deficits, openness to trade and quality of regulatory policies.

Bush drew the line at corruption. "Corruption is pass-fail. If you can't pass corruption you're presumed ineligible," an official said.

Those countries which perform better than the average on most indicators could qualify for a share of the resources, pending a review by a cabinet-level panel which will make final recommendations to the president.

To administer the program, Bush will ask Congress to create the so-called Millennium Challenge Corporation. The independent agency would be supervised by a board of directors composed of cabinet-level officials and chaired by Secretary of State Colin Powell.

Officials said the new agency would directly employ around 100 people and draw heavily on the expertise -- and staff -- of the U.S. Agency for International Development and other federal departments.

The new aid could flow to the countries themselves, as well as nongovernmental organizations and the private-sector.

As initially proposed earlier this year, $1.67 billion would start flowing in the fiscal 2004 budget climbing to around $3.33 billion the following year. At the end of the three-year start-up period, an extra $5 billion a year would automatically be included in the budget.

But administration officials said the fiscal 2004 commitment would probably be smaller than the $1.67 billion initially promised since it remains to be seen how many countries will qualify.

Mary McClymont, president of InterAction, welcomed the plan but expressed concern about the administration's commitment to provide full funding. "It could be a very important tool to help improve overall aid effectiveness and fight poverty," she said. "But of course what we will be watching is to make sure the funds in fact materialize."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
Would be nice if State didn't have a say either.
61 posted on 11/28/2002 3:07:36 PM PST by Righty1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Consider the source.
62 posted on 11/28/2002 3:07:41 PM PST by Redleg Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke
The source in post 46 cannot get any more credible.
63 posted on 11/29/2002 3:32:11 PM PST by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: glc1173@aol.com
DUMP BUSH 2004. Message to GOP: give us a real conservative - or we stay home from polls Election Day!

There are dozens of people here who would never vote for George W Bush under any circumistance, who now claim that they would vote for him under no cirmcumstance.

Withholding support you never gave him is not a frightening prospect.

64 posted on 11/29/2002 7:09:36 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Quite true.
65 posted on 11/30/2002 1:33:08 PM PST by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: dalebert
bump for answers and further info. about this thread.
66 posted on 12/01/2002 11:56:13 AM PST by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
Bumping back. I have not heard another word about this.
67 posted on 12/01/2002 12:44:49 PM PST by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: dalebert
Me neither.
68 posted on 12/01/2002 2:03:40 PM PST by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Gunslingr3
"There are people who think that plunder loses all its immorality as soon as it becomes legal. Personally, I cannot imagine a more alarming situation." -- Frederic Bastiat

Frederic-Bastiat-Bump

The Law by Bastiat
69 posted on 12/01/2002 5:40:04 PM PST by SkyRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
...the Philippines, Jordan, Thailand, Peru and more than 100 other countries could compete for foreign aid, but administration officials expect just 10 to 20 to receive assistance each year under the program.

What am I missing here? I didn't read the entire article word for word, but I derived from this plan that Dubya is trying to stick to his 'compassionate conservative' format by floating a possible 'trial balloon' to the Congress on aid to these poor countries - keyword being "POOR".

What has the Rat Party accomplished in the way of aid to poor countries? I know they talk a lot about it, but do they (have they) actually accomplish it, other than financing dictators for building their palaces while supressing their people? Do the masses ever see the benefit of the funds?

I know we (private sector and government) already give aid 'until it hurts' to countries in need. Maybe this is an added way to play down the 'greed' factor here in America, bring more and more people and countries onboard, win the the 'hate war' we are suffering from by Islamic nations (claimed mostly by the Left), and show to the world that the radicals have no reason to 'hate us'.

Just my take on this. Can't be sure it is valid argument, but then I'm not in Dubya's camp or of his caliber either.

70 posted on 12/01/2002 7:13:36 PM PST by SlightOfTongue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST

71 posted on 12/03/2002 10:51:43 AM PST by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SlightOfTongue


72 posted on 12/04/2002 2:37:12 AM PST by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
I must totally and unreservedly concur.
73 posted on 12/07/2002 9:10:15 AM PST by SlightOfTongue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
All this money does is prop up corrupt dictators and oligarchs. Prevents changes and reforms that would allow for middle class societies in these countries. The money never will make it to the poor.
74 posted on 12/07/2002 9:46:51 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
Sadly that is exactly what happens.
75 posted on 12/07/2002 12:09:22 PM PST by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Militiaman7; seamole; RippleFire; Jeff Head; patent; 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub; fatima; amom; ...


76 posted on 12/10/2002 5:35:44 AM PST by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Militiaman7


77 posted on 12/10/2002 5:36:57 AM PST by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: SlightOfTongue
bump
78 posted on 12/10/2002 5:38:01 AM PST by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
roads to drive on, Police forces to protect us, a Military force etc. That's only reasonable

Same old canard my socialist inlaws use.
OK, I'll pay for the rodes, police, military. Now - cut my taxes by 80% and we'll call it even.

79 posted on 12/10/2002 5:54:44 AM PST by MrB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile
If we don't 'give' it to them, THEY CAN ARREST US.

You have to take it all the way - THEY CAN KILL US.
Refuse to pay taxes, the police come to take you to jail. Refuse to go to jail, they will use physical force. Resist the physical force, they will kill you.

And it's all legal, because government solely retains the right of legally using deadly force to enforce even its most minor whims.

80 posted on 12/10/2002 5:57:50 AM PST by MrB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson