Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tpaine
At this late date, the biggest mystery I now see about the event is why ~anyone~ would be so adamant that the government version be accepted as gospel

I'll tell you why:

1. Evidence is strong that Communist Kennedy-hater Lee Harvey Oswald started work at the Texas School Book Depository long before it was known that Kennedy would be driving past. On the fateful day, Kennedy did not take the usual route for a Preisdent visiting Dallas, so Oswald could not have possibly taken that job hoping Kennedy would drive past.

2. Evidence is strong that Oswald shot from his workplace, at the Presdent, at a distance and with a weapon that one could reasonably expect to kill the President. And then the President died.

3. After the President's death, vast numbers of liberals just could not accept that a Communist, whether acting alone or with a moderate amount of Cuban government help, had killed the President. So they tried like defense attorneys to poke holes in the case against Oswald. Most of these conspiracy theorist just cannot accept that the Communist threat was real, so that had to look for holes in the obvious explanation for Kennedy's death.

As a conservative, it is easy for me to believe that this assasination was a communist hit. Then I read the story of Oswald's life, and it all comes together. The liberals don't want to believe the truth about what communism did at Daly Plaza. And a few conservatives have been taken in by an anti-government gloss being put on an essentially liberal attempt to blur the motive for Kennedy's death. Kennedy was killed because he asked us to "bear any burden" in fighting the ideology to which Mr. Osward and millions of other evil ones were committed (and, in North Korea, are committed. This is what should be remembered first when one remembers the Kennedy assasination.

79 posted on 11/24/2002 12:15:30 PM PST by Steve Eisenberg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: Steve Eisenberg; mlo; Jim Noble; Fred25
Yep, as I commented on the first JFK thread of the 'season' just a few days ago:

To: mlo; Jim Noble; Fred25

Whoever killed JFK has been able to sustain a decades-long coverup. -JN-

Yep. And they have, because the Warren Report investigation itself was the start of the coverup. - tpaine

But you *presume* the existence of a cover-up. That is not how you start. Shooter is correct, you must start with the crime itself. -mlo-

The Warren Report did exactly that. Ineptly. -- Anyone who believes the report is based on unbiased fact is in denial, and making an act of faith in the face of obvious governmental meddling with the evidence.
Why did the government 'cover up'? -- Your guess is as good as mine. But they did meddle. - They may have even had an incorrect reason for doing so.

[IE, - Fred25's theory, - they covered up for the KGB, to prevent WWIII]

65 posted on 11/21/2002 4:15 PM PST by tpaine
81 posted on 11/24/2002 12:35:20 PM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson