Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists Planning to Make New Form of Life
Washington Post ^ | Thursday, November 21, 2002 | Justin Gillis

Posted on 11/20/2002 10:09:24 PM PST by Int

Scientists Planning to Make New Form of Life

By Justin Gillis Washington Post Staff Writer Thursday, November 21, 2002; Page A01

Scientists in Rockville are to announce this morning that they plan to create a new form of life in a laboratory dish, a project that raises ethical and safety issues but also promises to illuminate the fundamental mechanics of living organisms.

J. Craig Venter, the gene scientist with a history of pulling off unlikely successes, and Hamilton O. Smith, a Nobel laureate, are behind the plan. Their intent is to create a single-celled, partially man-made organism with the minimum number of genes necessary to sustain life. If the experiment works, the microscopic man-made cell will begin feeding and dividing to create a population of cells unlike any previously known to exist.

To ensure safety, Smith and Venter said the cell will be deliberately hobbled to render it incapable of infecting people; it also will be strictly confined, and designed to die if it does manage to escape into the environment.

More worrisome than the risk of escape, they acknowledged, is that the project could lay the scientific groundwork for a new generation of biological weapons, a risk that may force them to be selective about publishing technical details. But they said the project could also help advance the nation's ability to detect and counter existing biological weapons.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: cell; crevolist; newformoflife; organism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
I can already see the headlines in tomorrow's British tabloids: FRANKENCELL!
1 posted on 11/20/2002 10:09:24 PM PST by Int
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Int
Democrats are desperately searching for new sources of voters with limited mental capacity. In desperation they even attempt to create voters from cells capable of sustaining life, but yet stupid enough to vote for Dimocrats.
2 posted on 11/20/2002 10:24:17 PM PST by F.J. Mitchell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Int
If they can reverse engineer DNA to the fundamentals like that... to the point they can claim the cell is "hobbled" before even testing it... my guess is that they really can't and what we will see is a slightly trimmed down version of an existing cell.
3 posted on 11/20/2002 10:30:31 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: HiTech RedNeck
I don't know if they'll succeed, but the article says the goal is to eliminate about 2/5 of the genes - is that "slightly trimmed" or not in your opinion?
5 posted on 11/20/2002 10:45:44 PM PST by edsheppa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: What is the bottom line
We need to find a permanent solution to terrorism soon, or I don't think we have much of a future. Terrorism is only strong because we are week.

The only thing that can stop terrorists is high costs of their endeavors. If they knew that for every victim we incur here they would loose a small town, you would forget in a wekk even how to spell "terrorism." We are not willing to do that, which is why we have an ever greater number of our fellow Americans killed. The same happened in 1930s: when it was possible to stop Hitler by killing a few thousand, noboday was willing to do that. It was of course, unavoidable and cost millions of lives rather than thousands.

There will be an all-out war after a complete realignment of forces (a collapse of NATO, probably). It'll cost millions of lives because we are not willing to do what's right --- starting with an ultimatum to Egypt and Suadi Arabia to stop vicious anti-American propaganda that creates terrorists.

6 posted on 11/20/2002 10:58:44 PM PST by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Int
I am not qualified to make a definitive statement regarding this process. What does come to mind is the desire to stop certain insects from doing their thing by bringing in the English Sparrow. Innocent things that we do have the tendency to flourish beyond our wildest dreams. God forbid some engineered entity ever go balistic. In the wrong setting, our world could be altered in ways we never imagined. With one disgruntled individual, it could actually happen by design.

What vehicle would Jesus drive? Folks, I'm telling you, they are out there.

It will be interesting to follow this process, something that we have no control over at all.

7 posted on 11/20/2002 11:58:50 PM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
God forbid some engineered entity ever go balistic. In the wrong setting, our world could be altered in ways we never imagined.

It's already happened...Michael Jackson

8 posted on 11/21/2002 12:02:32 AM PST by lonevoice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice
Ouch! Well I guess someone was going to go there. Can't understand why... Heh heh heh.
9 posted on 11/21/2002 12:39:22 AM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: *crevo_list; VadeRetro; PatrickHenry
Give this one a shot, guys.
10 posted on 11/21/2002 3:11:48 AM PST by Junior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Int
That's FRON-ken-gel ...
11 posted on 11/21/2002 3:14:55 AM PST by error99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro; jennyp; Junior; longshadow; *crevo_list; RadioAstronomer; Scully; Piltdown_Woman; ...
There's another thread on this topic, but I'm betting on this one to survive. Other thread.

[I'm always updating my ping list, which is mostly used for evolution threads, but sometimes for other science topics. If any evolution supporter wants to be included, let me know. If you've been getting unwanted pings, please tell me and I'll drop you. Don't worry about hurting my feelings; I understand that it can be troublesome being on too many lists. This is not a ping list for the creationism side of the debate.]

12 posted on 11/21/2002 3:51:47 AM PST by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: All
From the famous "list-o-links" (so the creationists don't get to start each new thread from ground zero).

Creation "Science" Debunked.

So that everyone will have access to the accumulated Creationism vs. Evolution threads which have previously appeared on FreeRepublic, plus links to hundreds of sites with a vast amount of information on this topic, here's Junior's massive work, available for all to review:
The Ultimate Creation vs. Evolution Resource [ver 19].

13 posted on 11/21/2002 3:57:15 AM PST by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: All
From Scientific American: 15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense.
14 posted on 11/21/2002 4:02:10 AM PST by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Why are you trying to disrupt and hijack this thread?
15 posted on 11/21/2002 7:12:19 AM PST by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
There's another thread on this topic, but I'm betting on this one to survive...

We could switch threads when one becomes infected with long-winded, non-responsive posts.

16 posted on 11/21/2002 7:14:02 AM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Int
Scientists Planning to Make New Form of Life

I thought that had already been done:


17 posted on 11/21/2002 8:56:14 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

18 posted on 11/21/2002 8:56:49 AM PST by Condorman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Int
Look I added new hubcaps to my Lexus, I have invented a new car!
19 posted on 11/21/2002 9:06:13 AM PST by Rodm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Int
To ensure safety, Smith and Venter said the cell will be deliberately hobbled to render it incapable of infecting people;

Hobble it? Are they going to break its ankles?

it also will be strictly confined, and designed to die if it does manage to escape into the environment.

I saw a movie like that a while ago. Something with giant mutant bugs that did manage to escape into the environment and live.

20 posted on 11/21/2002 9:12:29 AM PST by Fzob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson