Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush's Right Tone
American Prowler ^ | 10/30/2002 | R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr.

Posted on 10/29/2002 9:33:05 PM PST by Pokey78

Washington -- Around the White House, the President's political advisers will tell you that George W. Bush really was serious when he campaigned in 2000 on the pledge to "change the tone in Washington." What is more they will tell you that the idea was the candidate's, not a political adviser's. Finally, they will tell you that the gentlemanly tone is something he believes in. Moreover, it may be working. President Bush's less invidious style may explain why right now the Republicans are in striking distance of reversing the usual midterm results, a loss for the President's party in Congress.

Only three times in the last century did an incumbent president pick up Congressional seats in his first midterm election. Today it is possible that the Republicans will maintain control of the House of Representatives and eke out a one-seat majority in the Senate. One reason for this historic reversal is Americans' concern for their security owing to the war on terror and to the general perception that Saddam Hussein is dangerous. That concern for personal security was probably exacerbated by the three-week terror created by the Washington snipers. But there is also a positive reason that Americans may give the Republicans majorities in both houses of Congress. That is the President's "new tone in Washington."

In his numerous campaign stops for Republican House and Senate candidates, the President invariably accentuates positive messages in each candidate's campaign and never speaks ill of the Democratic opponent. It is a significant difference from past presidential midterm campaigning. Reporter Bill Sammon, the author of a very good insider's peak into the Bush White House, Fighting Back: The War on Terrorism -- From Inside the Bush White House, interviewed an anonymous White House operative who cited the benign consequence of his boss's gentlemanly approach to midterm campaigning. "What's also unique is that the opposition this year is not running against George W. Bush," the Bush aide told Sammon. "In fact, to the contrary, you've got Democrats all over the country who are using the President's likeness in their advertising, trying to say, 'I'm a Bush person, too, even in cases where they're not."

Well, that is a bit of a stretch, it seems to me, but maybe not. The President does have an approval rating of nearly 70% -- twenty to thirty percentage points higher than Presidents Reagan or Clinton in their first midterm elections. Still, the general point stands, to wit: the President's gentlemanly tone is an attractive alternative to the acrimony of yesteryear's Washington pols.

For a taste of the old rebarbative tone, consider Senator Hillary Clinton. At a fund-raiser for the wilting candidacy of Missouri's Senator Jean Carnahan, Clinton hissed that the President was raising money "to try to ruin the reputations of our candidates, or if they can't, to depress the turnout." Not only is this precisely the opposite of what the suave forty-third president is doing on the campaign trail, it goes against his stated style of being positive and ingratiating. Newsweek reports that Senator Clinton went on to say of the Bush Republicans that "These people are ruthless and they are relentless." Well, around the White House the mission is to be ruthlessly and relentlessly amiable. It seems to work.

Senator Clinton is also given to claiming that the President was "selected," not elected. Here is more of the old-style Washington tone of venom and distortion. Candidate Bush won every official recount in the disputed Florida race and all but one media reconstruction of the race. To keep insisting that Bush did not fairly win his presidency is simply dirty politics. It might also be lying, more lying from a political operator caught lying repeatedly by Federal prosecutors.

Interestingly, the Clintons after the forty-second president's impeachment made much of their intention to end what they called "the politics of personal destruction." In the above quotes from New York's junior senator you can see how very difficult it is for them to end this odious tactic. That is because they practiced the politics of personal destruction. It was about the only politics they new. Now, would it not be ironic if George W. Bush actually succeeds in overcoming the politics of personal destruction with good manners and a positive message? Just call him the herald of a New Politics, "the politics of personal ingratiation."



TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 10/29/2002 9:33:05 PM PST by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pokey78; Mo1; Wphile; rintense; kayak
Great Read, Thanks for posting this Pokey78! :-)

Ping for a great read :-)

2 posted on 10/29/2002 9:42:35 PM PST by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan; patriciaruth
A ping for you two, too! :-)
3 posted on 10/29/2002 9:44:32 PM PST by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
Thanks for the ping. The clintons don't know anything other than the "politics of personal destruction." Sheesh...they practically invented it.

GO W!

4 posted on 10/29/2002 9:45:48 PM PST by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
Thanks for the ping.
5 posted on 10/29/2002 10:14:12 PM PST by patriciaruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
Still, the general point stands, to wit: the President's gentlemanly tone is an attractive alternative to the acrimony of yesteryear's Washington pols.

President Bush is a breath of freash air

THanks for the ping

6 posted on 10/29/2002 10:18:28 PM PST by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78; MJY1288; Molly Pitcher; A Citizen Reporter; jtill; kassie; Neets; Utah Girl; illstillbe; ..
Now, would it not be ironic if George W. Bush actually succeeds in overcoming the politics of personal destruction with good manners and a positive message? Just call him the herald of a New Politics, "the politics of personal ingratiation."

What a great article!

7 posted on 10/29/2002 11:01:13 PM PST by kayak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78; #3Fan; A CA Guy; Amelia; anniegetyourgun; AppyPappy; ArneFufkin; Arthur McGowan; ...
A ((( ping ))) for a great article.
8 posted on 10/29/2002 11:12:11 PM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
Thanks, was worth reading.

PS, already voted by mail. Wasn't sure if I could make it to my home town to vote, so rather than take a chance, I voted by mail.

I hope we get Simon and NO on all bonds of course.

Bonds = taxes
9 posted on 10/29/2002 11:16:45 PM PST by A CA Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kayak
Thanks for the ping!!!!
10 posted on 10/29/2002 11:31:58 PM PST by Brad’s Gramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lorena
ping
11 posted on 10/29/2002 11:35:54 PM PST by kayak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kayak
Now, would it not be ironic if George W. Bush actually succeeds in overcoming the politics of personal destruction with good manners and a positive message?

Good manners and decorum are things about which democrats seem to be totally clueless, as shown by their "memorial service" for Wellstone tonight.

Great article by Tyrell (always a favorite). Thanks for the ping, kay. I'll post a link to this on ATRW in the morning.

12 posted on 10/29/2002 11:46:47 PM PST by Lorena
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
BTTT
13 posted on 10/30/2002 12:00:34 AM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
Good article.
14 posted on 10/30/2002 3:58:21 AM PST by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kayak
Thanks, Kay.
15 posted on 10/30/2002 4:45:55 AM PST by Molly Pitcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad; Howlin
Senator Clinton is also given to claiming that the President was "selected," not elected.

Rush made the point that the Hildabeast said this while attempting to help Senator Carnahan, who will be facing her FIRST election - next week.

16 posted on 10/30/2002 4:48:46 AM PST by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78; MJY1288; Wphile; mtngrl@vrwc; lawgirl; kayak; mamaduck; Lorena; patriciaruth; ...
"In fact, to the contrary, you've got Democrats all over the country who are using the President's likeness in their advertising, trying to say, 'I'm a Bush person, too, even in cases where they're not."

Boy, this is true. You see Democrat ads all over the place saying, 'worked with President Bush on....'

A big thumbs up for our GENTLEMAN President!

17 posted on 10/30/2002 5:51:09 AM PST by ohioWfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
Thanks for the Ping and a Bump!
18 posted on 10/30/2002 11:30:31 AM PST by lawgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
Thank you for the ping. I love the contrast between our classy President and the shrill, panicked junior senator from NY!
19 posted on 10/30/2002 5:46:00 PM PST by McLynnan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson