Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FRANK'S RUNNING: Torricelli-Lautenberg-DNC Switcheroo Schemes Disenfranchise America
PoliticsNJ.com | 0-23-02 | STEVE KORNACKI, Mia T

Posted on 10/24/2002 2:51:55 PM PDT by Mia T

Forrester debates an empty chair as Lautenberg skips radio debate

 

 

By STEVE KORNACKI

PoliticsNJ.com

TRENTON, October 23 - The candidates for U.S. Senate sounded familiar themes today, with Democrat Frank R. Lautenberg pumping his prescription drug plan and Republican Douglas R. Forrester pushing his national security agenda.Ý But the campaign took an interesting twist at night, when a debate was held with only one candidate.

Trenton-based New Jersey 101.5 (WKXW) went ahead with a one-hour forum that had originally been scheduled when Senator Robert G. Torricelli was the Democratic nominee.

Forrester appeared, but he was alone.Ý Lautenberg refused the station's invitations, with his spokesman pointing to what he called an anti-Lautenberg slant among the station's talk show hosts.

The Democrat's refusal to participate featured prominently in the broadcast, with moderator Eric Scott telling listeners at the start of the broadcast that a seat with Lautenberg's name on it would be available for the former senator if he had a change of heart.

Scott, who also serves as the station's news director, said the forum is a modern tradition in statewide races, with every major party candidate participating in the last 12 years.Ý That includes Lautenberg, who appeared when he sought re-election in 1994.Ý He estimated the audience for the program at around one million listeners and said the station is consistently tops in the ratings.

After the forum, Scott defended his news operation's objectivity, saying that the content of talk programs on NJ 101.5 has to be separated from that of its news broadcasts.

"It's called a news-talk station for a distinct reason," he said.Ý "There's a news part and there's a talk part.Ý The news division has never been accused of having a bias."Ý

Forrester fielded calls from listeners for about an hour, on topics ranging from how he acquired his personal wealth to employment discrimination against gays and lesbians. While there was no opponent to challenge him, Forrester was pressed on several issues, including Lautenberg's calls for him to release his tax returns, by Scott.

Lautenberg was reported to be at a veteran's rally in Teaneck and a fund-raiser in Leonia tonight, but his campaign spokesman did not return calls seeking comment.Ý In a statement released last night, Forrester campaign manager Bill Pascoe said that Lautenberg was not at the Teaneck event.

Earlier in the day, Lautenberg appeared at a pharmacy Colonia, calling for access to prescription drugs for seniors under Medicare.Ý He also attacked Forrester's prescription drug plan as too expensive for the average senior citizen.

Forrester appeared in Teaneck at the Torah Academy of Bergen County, a private Jewish school.Ý There, he detailed his support for the Koby Mandell Act, a measure designed to aid the pursuit of terrorists around the world.Ý Ý

Afterwards, he addressed Lautenberg's decision on Tuesday to appear at an October 30 debate on News 12 New Jersey.Ý Forrester also agreed to the appearance, but in doing so his campaign took shots at the format, which includes the four minor-party candidates in the first hour of the program.

"It's too little, too late," Forrester asserted.Ý "And the fact that he had to be arm-wrestled into doing it suggests something very, very bad about his candidacy."

Forrester has accused Lautenberg of avoiding debates for weeks.Ý He said the Democrats had argued that the voters are best served with a Democrat and Republican in the race when they sought to replace Torricelli with Lautenberg on the ballot, but that they are now ignoring that reasoning.

"It's highly unfortunate that we can't get into a situation where we're one-on-one, because that was the argument that was made in court, that it was so essential," Forrester said.Ý "I don't want anyone to forget the shenanigans that were involved to get even this little bit."

The Republican added that he feels Lautenberg won't debate because he wants to avoid questions about his record on issues such as national security.ÝÝ But Forrester denied apparent suggestions in his own press releases that Lautenberg might not be alert enough to debate.

On Tuesday, Forrester's campaign issued a press release on the subject of debates, and said of Lautenberg, "He's been out of circulation so long that we have to ask: Does he even remember where he stands on the issues?"

The release went on to cite a report from the Reuters news agency that described Lautenberg's response to a question at a voter forum as "rambling", and said voters should question whether the 78-year-old Lautenberg has "the fitness to serve."

"I do not believe that age should necessarily be a limitation to serve in the United States Senate," Forrester said yesterday.Ý He added that his criticism of Lautenberg on the age issue comes from what he sees as the Democrat's hypocrisy on the issue.

In 1982, the then-58-year-old Lautenberg defeated Republican Millicent H. Fenwick in a U.S. Senate race, in part, many believe, by suggesting that at 72, Fenwick was too old to serve.

"I think he was wrong for that, and I think he should apologize," Forrester said.Ý

At an event last week, Lautenberg brushed off questions of his age, saying he felt he could "out-run" his 49-year-old opponent.

"If you look at me," Lautenberg said, "I think you'll see I'm fairly pugnacious."

 



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: clintonizeddnc; debatenoshow; dncvotefraud; lautenberg; mcauliffecorruption; switcheroo; torricelli
 

 

 

Torricelli-Lautenberg-DNC Two-Step Not 1st Foray into Virtual Reality

NJ Senators Tested "RUNet 2000," DNC Switcheroo Scheme Precursor, in 1998


1 posted on 10/24/2002 2:51:56 PM PDT by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mia T
I don't know where you've been Mia - MIA I guess! There was a thread a while back discussing your absence. Glad you're back.
2 posted on 10/24/2002 2:55:33 PM PDT by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Thank you for the scum report. You do it so nicely.
3 posted on 10/24/2002 2:59:32 PM PDT by martian_22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Welcome back MIA!!!
4 posted on 10/24/2002 4:19:17 PM PDT by JOE6PAK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Lautenberg's going to win, anyway. New Jersey tradition demands that only the most corrupt people may be installed in office.

For New Jersey, elections, debates and the rule of law are an annoying, and apparently optional, distraction from the business of fleecing the masses and distributing the take to the criminal organizations that really run the state.

5 posted on 10/24/2002 5:20:44 PM PDT by Imal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Imal; hchutch
Actually this race is VERY WINNABLE for Forrester. All he has to do is pick up the phone and call Howard Stern for about 10 minutes to ask for his endorsement. I ABSOLUTELY GUARANTEE that Forrester would thereby gain a MINIMUM of 100,000 extra votes and WIN the election. This is an INCREDIBLE opportunity and is a TRUE TRAGEDY if Forrester doesn't take advantage of this.

p.s. Howard Stern has stated in the past that he can't stand Lautenberg so gaining his endorsement of Forrester would be easy---But Forrester MUST make that phone call to get the endorsement.

6 posted on 10/24/2002 5:28:57 PM PDT by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: William Creel
You could try talking to Forrester directly...

Yeah, Doug is going to make a special trip down to Florida in the middle of a heated campaign just to chat with ol' PJ. < /sarcasm>

or maybe get Stern to call Forrester.

Sorry that won't happen. Forrest must call Stern. The good news is that Howard would DEFINITELY take the call and the even better news is that Howard hates Lousenberg which makes his endorsement of Forrester a certainity. I sure hope Forrester IS planning on calling Howard but is just waiting for the last week for maximum effect. Once he makes that call, I can rest easy in the knowledge that Forrester will win in NJ and that the Republicans will have a net gain of 3 seats in the Senate..... Thereby preventing any party switcheroos by Linkscariot Chafee.

8 posted on 10/24/2002 6:33:10 PM PDT by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Love it! BTTT!
9 posted on 10/24/2002 9:24:01 PM PDT by IVote2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IVote2; All
clinton-McAuliffe-DNC CORRUPTING ELECTORAL PROCESS/UNDERMINING HOMELAND SECURITY

10 posted on 10/25/2002 6:14:27 AM PDT by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: All

October 25, 2002
Contact: Tom Rubino
(609) 890-4699

Lautenberg To Women Voters: "I Don't Want To Talk To You"

 
 
 
(TRENTON, OCTOBER 25) -- U.S. Senate candidate Doug Forrester held a news conference outside the WPVI-TV 6 studios in Trenton today during the time when the League of Women Voters, WABC-TV 7, and WPVI-TV 6 had invited him and Frank Lautenberg to debate. Instead, Doug stood next to a vacant podium with Lautenberg's name on it. Doug Forrester issued the following statement:
 
"At this very moment, Frank Lautenberg is supposed to be debating me -- at this very studio at the League of Women Voters' debate sponsored by WPVI and WABC TV, but 'Any-Where, Any-Time Frank' refused.
 
"In a disturbing twist, Mr. Lautenberg told NJN yesterday, he's doing 'three debates in a period of really three weeks.' After nearly a month of stalling on debates, this is really astounding, considering that his campaign has only reluctantly agreed to TWO debates -- on WNBC-TV with Gabe Pressman and on News Channel 12.
 
"Which of the other eight debates that he has been stalling on has he now agreed to? The one with WCBS-TV's Marcia Kramer on Sunday? NBC's 'Meet the Press?' The Herald News / The Record of Hackensack debate for broadcast on UPN-TV 9? How about giving South Jersey a chance, with the Comcast / Millenium Radio / Gannet Town Hall debate at Rowan University in Glassboro? Or maybe NOW he wants to go on NJ 101.5 FM, even though it aired on Wednesday -- when I sat next to an empty chair with Mr. Lautenberg's name on it.
 
"When Frank Lautenberg told the League of Women Voters to 'forget it,' he was sending a clear message to the women of New Jersey: 'I don't want to talk to you.'
 
"Well, I do. And as your U.S. Senator, I'll fight everyday to improve your lives and the lives of your families.
 
"The women of New Jersey deserve a Senator who will show up, one who will listen to their concerns -- not one who will duck every opportunity, and leave an empty podium"
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
###

 

Contact: Forrester 2002, Inc. | 3535 Quakerbridge Road | Suite 400 | Hamilton, NJ 08619 | 609.890.4699 tel | 609.890.9932 fax
Privacy Policy | (c) 2002 Forrester 2002, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Paid for by Forrester 2002, Inc.


11 posted on 10/25/2002 5:37:44 PM PDT by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: All
See Frank run.
Q ERTY7
"It's the homeland security, stupid"
Q ERTY6 utter failure bump!

 


12 posted on 10/26/2002 8:04:31 AM PDT by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson