[TXBubba]

I think they could sue under the angle of sexual harrassment. After all the e-mail did have to do with sex and not just diversity.

[RobRoy]

According to diversity training, if something you do or say of a sexual nature is offensive to someone, you have indeed sexually harrassed that person.

This man used the key word "offensive" which is, I believe, how a word or action has to be defined by the harassee for their to be a case.

The fact that he was fired for BEING OFFENDED by a company email of a sexual nature (IT WAS SPECIFICALLY REFERRING TO A GROUP THAT SODOMIZES EACH OTHER) suggests to me that he was, in fact, discriminated against by the company and should sue.

[weegee]

It's sexual harassment. At least until they start celebrating "Congratulations on losing your virginity to a heterosexual Day".