Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Leakeys Named Explorers-in-Residence
Science - AP ^ | Wed Oct 16, 4:15 PM ET

Posted on 10/18/2002 2:05:21 PM PDT by Junior

WASHINGTON (AP) - The mother-daughter team of Maeve and Louise Leakey is the latest explorers-in-residence at the National Geographic (news - web sites) Society.

The Leakeys, both paleontologists, continue the archaeological research begun in 1924 in Africa by Louis S.B. Leakey, the father-in-law of Maeve and the grandfather of Louise. The society announced their selection Tuesday.

Maeve Leakey is the current leader of the family and has reported the find of a 3.5-million-year-old fossil skull and partial jaw, believed to be from a new branch of early humans.

She has worked at the National Museums of Kenya since 1969. In 1994 she discovered some of the earliest evidence of ancient hominids, some 4 million years old.

Daughter Louise has focused on the effect of changing climate on evolution and has joined her mother in researching early humans in Kenya.

Members of the explorers-in-residence program receive support from the society for their research, work with society staff in developing programs and take part in society-sponsored events.

Other current explorers-in-residence include primatologist Jane Goodall, underwater explorer Robert Ballard and Egyptian archaeologist Zahi Hawass.

___

On the Net:

National Geographic Society: http://www.ngs.org


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: crevo; crevolist; leakey

1 posted on 10/18/2002 2:05:21 PM PDT by Junior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *crevo_list; PatrickHenry; VadeRetro; scripter; Gumlegs; longshadow; Condorman; general_re; ...
ping.
2 posted on 10/18/2002 2:07:16 PM PDT by Junior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Junior
I'm interested in finding out who leaked this....
3 posted on 10/18/2002 2:10:53 PM PDT by IncPen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Junior
Well, I guess it's to be expected that evolution runs in the family.
4 posted on 10/18/2002 2:11:01 PM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Junior
Is this, status wise, above or below a Nobel prize> Not being a part of the culture, I haven't got a clue.

I am quite familiar with the name, however (hence my bothering to post here).

George Baily was a member of the National Geographic Society I believe.
5 posted on 10/18/2002 2:13:53 PM PDT by RobRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy
I'm a member of the National Geographic society ...
6 posted on 10/18/2002 2:14:46 PM PDT by Junior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
So, if the family endows a chair at some institution, would it be forever after referred to as "the Leakey Chair?"
7 posted on 10/18/2002 2:15:51 PM PDT by Junior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Junior
Nearby, an on-line special contains what's below. The consipracy spreads! Horror! Horror!
A New Light on Skin Color

By Saadia Iqbal

Differences in skin color are intriguing, but few of us have a clear idea what causes the variations. Scientists have long known that human skin color varies with the amount of exposure to the sun's ultraviolet (UV) radiation, but until recently they had not identified the process of natural selection that actually influences this phenomenon. Now the work of scientists Nina Jablonski and George Chaplin, of the California Academy of Sciences, casts a new light on race concepts by relating skin-color variation to evolution and reproduction.

Folate and the Sunshine Vitamin

Melanin, the brown pigment in the skin, acts as a natural sunscreen. It protects against UV, and populations in the tropics are darker skinned since there is more sunlight where they live. UV ages the skin, causes skin cancer, and—most significant to Jablonski and Chaplin's work— breaks down folate, essential vitamin B needed for cell division and producing new DNA.

Pregnant women in particular require large amounts of folate to support rapid cell division in the embryo. Women of reproductive age are advised to take folate supplements to prevent serious birth defects such as spina bifida. So if a higher melanin level is so beneficial, why isn't everyone dark-skinned?

In their analysis of human evolutionary history, Jablonski and Chaplin concluded that modern humans most likely evolved in the tropics, where they were exposed to high UV levels. But as they moved into regions away from the equator, where UV levels are lower, humans became fairer so as to allow enough UV radiation to penetrate their skin and produce vitamin D, the "sunshine vitamin," also obtained from eating fish and marine mammals. Vitamin D is essential for maintaining healthy blood levels of calcium and phosphorous, and thus promoting bone growth.

Skin color, according to Jablonski and Chaplin, basically becomes a balancing act between the evolutionary demands of photo-protection and the need to create vitamin D in the skin.

But things aren't always what they ought to be. That is the case with Eskimos and other inhabitants of northern Alaska and northern Canada. "Looking at Alaska, one would think that the native people should be pale as ghosts," Jablonski says. One of the reasons they're not is that these populations have not lived in the region very long in terms of geological time. But more importantly, their traditional diet is rich in fish and other seafood. They've consumed huge doses of vitamin D, so they haven't had to undergo the same reduction in pigmentation that would otherwise be required at such high latitudes. "What's really interesting is that if these people don't eat their aboriginal diets of fish and marine mammals, they suffer tremendously high rates of vitamin D-deficiency diseases such as rickets in children and osteoporosis in adults," Jablonski says.

A similar problem occurs when dark-skinned people move to northern latitudes. "For years people couldn't understand why dark Indians and Pakistanis living in northern England suffered from vitamin D-deficiency diseases," Jablonski says. "Now it has become clear that the natural sunscreen in their skins wouldn't allow them to synthesize enough vitamin D from the sunlight." Cultural factors exacerbated the problem, such as the wearing of veils by some Muslim women. "It's a real detective story," she adds.

Race: A Manmade Grouping

One of the important implications of Jablonski and Chaplin's work is that it underlines the concept of race as purely a social construct, with no scientific grounds. DNA research has shown that genetically all humans, regardless of skin color and other surface distinctions, are basically the same. In an April 2001 article titled, "The Genetic Archaeology of Race," published in the Atlantic Monthly, Steve Olson writes "the genetic variants affecting skin color and facial features are essentially meaningless —they probably involve a few hundred of the billions of nucleotides in a person's DNA. Yet societies have built elaborate systems of privilege and control on these insignificant genetic differences."

Jablonski and Chaplin view their work as relevant to how we get along with each other. According to Jablonski, many people are "happy and relieved" when they hear about this research. "All of a sudden their own coloration isn't something that was just handed to them," she says. "It isn't a social stigma. It's something that evolved in their ancestors for a good set of biological reasons. And it takes the wind out of racism and bigotry. It's a fairly simple and beautiful explanation for one of the most obvious characteristics that distinguishes humans."


8 posted on 10/18/2002 2:15:56 PM PDT by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Of course, they could put together an annual prize for advances in anthropology: The Leakey Cup.
9 posted on 10/18/2002 2:18:17 PM PDT by Junior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Junior
So, if the family endows a chair at some institution, would it be forever after referred to as "the Leakey Chair?"

And if one of the Leakey boys marries Farah Fawcett, their offspring would be the Leakey-Fawcetts.

10 posted on 10/18/2002 2:20:03 PM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Junior
The mother-daughter team of Maeve and Louise Leakey is the latest explorers-in-residence...

Isn't that a contradiction in terms?

11 posted on 10/18/2002 2:21:32 PM PDT by NovemberCharlie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Junior
Cool...

No, I'm not being sarcastic.
12 posted on 10/18/2002 2:54:17 PM PDT by RobRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Well, I guess it's to be expected that evolution runs in the family.

So does diarrhea… LOL!

13 posted on 10/18/2002 2:58:24 PM PDT by Heartlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Junior; Gumlegs


14 posted on 10/18/2002 3:17:56 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Junior
Of course, they could put together an annual prize for advances in anthropology: The Leakey Cup.

Arrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrgh! The only good pun is a bad pun.

15 posted on 10/19/2002 12:20:20 PM PDT by balrog666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson