Are you going to sue Simon out in California because he was stupid enough to shot himself in the foot the other day wasting all the time and effort and money of his contributors? No. No one has a guarantee of results. Contributors put up money and effort and takes their chance.
In a democratic republic, its a hard case to make that you as a candidate were harmed because citizens much preferred to vote for a different candidate.
The major point is that the NJ Supreme court usurped the NJ Legislative just powers.
Could be but the NJ Supreme Court merely says they have interpretated the law written by the legislature. Till you get SCOTUS to say otherwise, its the law.
Are you going to sue Simon out in California because he was stupid enough to shot himself in the foot the other day wasting all the time and effort and money of his contributors? No. No one has a guarantee of results. Contributors put up money and effort and takes their chance.
The Legislature sets election laws to protect the voters. I showed how many of the NJ voters were harmed. Plus, the NJ voters have been harmed by the NJ Supreme Court usurping Legislative just power and undermining the just separation of powers. Your Simon argument is a false analogy. There's no law against spending money stupidly.
Could be but the NJ Supreme Court merely says they have interpretated the law written by the legislature. Till you get SCOTUS to say otherwise, its the law.
I don't have to get the US Supreme Court to say otherwise -- to preserve justice. For that is their -- the US Supreme Court Judges' -- responsibility. It certainly wouldn't be the first time that unjust law is upheld. I have made my stand for objective justice and objective law know, and you as well have made your stand known.