Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kennedy: Bush Iraq Plan a 'Pearl Harbor in Reverse'
NewsMax.com ^ | 10/07/02 | Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

Posted on 10/07/2002 10:38:22 PM PDT by kattracks

Sen. Ted Kennedy, D-Mass., said Monday that U.S. plans for preemptive action against Iraq reminded him of the Japanese sneak attack on Pearl Harbor 61 years ago.

Debating President Bush's request for congressional authority to make war, Kennedy warned the Senate that a U.S. Iraq attack would be "a Pearl Harbor in reverse," according to the Associated Press.

He urged the Bush White House to use the same restraint President John F. Kennedy did in not attacking Cuba during the 1962 missile crisis.

Sen. Kennedy made no reference to the disastrous Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba a year earlier: the ill-fated CIA operation approved by his brother that prompted Fidel Castro to invite the Soviet Union to position nuclear missiles 90 miles off U.S. shores.

In urging Bush to show restraint towards Saddam Hussein, Sen. Kennedy seemed to be following in the footsteps of his late father, Joseph P. Kennedy, who, as Ambassador to the Court of St. James in 1939, argued that the U.S. should make a separate peace with Adolf Hitler.

Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:

Bush Administration
DNC
Saddam Hussein/Iraq



TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

1 posted on 10/07/2002 10:38:22 PM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: kattracks
How in the hell could Teddy and JFK be brothers? One of them got switched at birth
3 posted on 10/07/2002 10:42:00 PM PDT by bybybill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead
Really. How much longer is that pickled liver of Ted going to keep functioning.
4 posted on 10/07/2002 10:42:22 PM PDT by evolved_rage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
It would be Pearl Harbor in reverse, because we have publically disclosed what we intend to do, which the Japanese didn't do.
5 posted on 10/07/2002 10:42:26 PM PDT by coloradan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coloradan
Kennedy is a loser. Put a sock in it Ted!
6 posted on 10/07/2002 10:46:39 PM PDT by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead
where's that serial sniper when you need him...

seems to me that worrying about sodamn-insane should be secondary til we clean out the house and senate of America's home grown enemies,,,

vsm

7 posted on 10/07/2002 10:48:03 PM PDT by vinylsidingman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
What did you guys expect? Teddy sat at pappy Old Joe's feet when he was licking Hitler's boots.
8 posted on 10/07/2002 10:48:47 PM PDT by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Sen. Ted Kennedy, D-Mass., said Monday that U.S. plans for preemptive action against Iraq reminded him of the Japanese sneak attack on Pearl Harbor 61 years ago.

There won't be anything sneak about THIS attack. It'll be "I'm comin' after you Saddam" and the bombs will rain forthwith.

9 posted on 10/07/2002 10:49:20 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Be nice to Teddy.
It's just the syphilis talking.
10 posted on 10/07/2002 10:51:40 PM PDT by RodgerD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RodgerD
I thought it was the high test ethyl alcohol.
11 posted on 10/07/2002 11:00:12 PM PDT by Post Toasties
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bybybill
How in the hell could Teddy and JFK be brothers? One of them got switched at birth...

-------------------------

They were two peas in a pod. Neither of the were/are too bright. Both were/are psychopaths. Jack was better looking and had a bit of Irish wit. He also had Ted Sorenson writing books and speeches for him.

12 posted on 10/07/2002 11:02:54 PM PDT by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
What needs to be done is to declare Massachusetts a no-man's land unprotected by the United States and subject to attack by any terrorist group. If they get nuked up there it result in an improvement in the United States and the trash they send to national office will no longer be a problem.
13 posted on 10/07/2002 11:08:10 PM PDT by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"He urged the Bush White House to use the same restraint President John F. Kennedy did ...

Sen. Kennedy made no reference to the disastrous Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba..."

LMAO

14 posted on 10/07/2002 11:09:02 PM PDT by TheLooseThread
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Sneak attack when all you see on TV and in the papers are American warplans?

Kennedy does not want to go to war why? Too much money spent on military and defense instead of his "programs" and pork?

He is the perfect example of why we need term limits - to prevent a Ted Kennedy - fat cat politician.
15 posted on 10/07/2002 11:11:51 PM PDT by ClancyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClancyJ
Kennedy does not want to go to war why?

---------------------------------------

He thinks he's in the forefront of appealing to the hippie intellectual left. Unfortunately Massachusetts is filled with glorified hippies and it gets him reelected.

16 posted on 10/07/2002 11:23:47 PM PDT by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
So says the swimmer and murderer.
17 posted on 10/07/2002 11:31:16 PM PDT by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RLK
I keep forgetting that some of those senators DO have hippies and socialists for constituents. Yes - the left rules there.
18 posted on 10/07/2002 11:32:25 PM PDT by ClancyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: coloradan
It would be Pearl Harbor in reverse, because we have publically disclosed what we intend to do, which the Japanese didn't do.

Not to mention the fact that there is no moral relationship between what Japan did to us and what we are about to do to Iraq.

19 posted on 10/07/2002 11:36:12 PM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson