Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE GREAT ELECTION HEIST
New York Post ^ | 10/03/02 | ERIC FETTMANN

Posted on 10/03/2002 1:24:58 AM PDT by kattracks

Edited on 05/26/2004 5:09:12 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

October 3, 2002 -- FRANK Hague would have loved it.

Somewhere, the ghost of the longtime Jersey City Democratic boss - who famously declared, "I am the law!" - is looking down (or, more likely, up) with a huge grin at the goings on in his state's U.S. Senate race.


(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 10/03/2002 1:24:58 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Baroni, one of Forrester's lawyers at the oral arguments in NJ yesterday, said that federal law requires military ballots to be sent out 35 days before the election. Can somebody find the source of this legal requirement? The NJ Justices claimed yesterday not to be able to find it. It's probably not in the statute, but in something (regulation? ruling?) issued by the federal executive branch.
2 posted on 10/03/2002 3:30:38 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"But can Lautenberg win?"

Even now, as I write this, truckloads of dead bodies are on their way from Chicago to New Jersey . . .

3 posted on 10/03/2002 4:27:46 AM PDT by KeyBored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyBored
You can bet your life the ballot boxes are already stuffed with ballots with Frank Lautenberg's name on them. It will a miracle if Doug Forrester wins in as corrupt a state as New Jersey in November.
4 posted on 10/03/2002 4:31:47 AM PDT by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Still, Lautenberg does rob Forrester of his prime issue: the need to replace New Jersey's sleazy senior senator.

And, in effect, the NJ Supreme Court has robbed Forrester of a great deal of time, effort, and campaign money which he spent defining his prior sleazy opponent.

Has anybody seen a poll of Forrester vs. Lautenberg?

5 posted on 10/03/2002 8:01:19 AM PDT by TheEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheEngineer
How about a declaration by the courts that the "Torch's" 5 million campaign war chest is to be divided amongst the other party candidates, based on primary vote counts, to offset and reimburse for already spent campaign ads, etc.??

takes the money away from the Dems. and if the Torch is out of politics, he shouldn't be able to keep it; and since it is the Dems that did this "bait and switch", why should they keep the money??!

Mike

6 posted on 10/03/2002 9:38:27 AM PDT by Vineyard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson