[Jim Noble]

>>And we have a good chance for the first time in 30 years to elect a Republican senator. I say fight. <<

By all means, fight.

But recognize that states where a delusional communist got 56% of the Presidential vote in 2000 will, in all likelihood, have two RAT Senators. It's not your fault, it's not the fault of the courts. It's the fault of the morons who live in your state.

Forrester must make the case (not hard, IMO) that he would be a better Senator than Lautenberg. Force the Dems to announce they will replace Lautenberg after he's elected. Expose the whole process for the farce it is.

My point is not that you should not fight (although I don't think it's wise to fight in the courts).

My point is that, in all the Republican "New Jerseys" in America, there are fourteen RAT Senators who should be defeated easily. It is unwise to waste effort or emotional energy on NJ that should be spent ridding the Senate of RATs from the Dakotas, Georgia, etc, etc.

[agrace]

I agree with you that Forrester should take his fight to the campaign trail. Absolutely. No way Lautenberg is up to speed and that should be exploited, as well as this outrageous situation. But since I actually live here, I can't actually bring myself to flush this senate race from a national perspective. Especially because we are so close! :) Besides, we NEED a Republican senator in this NYC suburb. He theoretically represents a lot of people, since NJ is quite a populous state.

However, by no means should the Republican party neglect other senate races in favor of this one, but rather treat EACH ONE as if it is the "make or break majority race." Just my opinion.