Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Black Agnes
We should fight fire with fire.
In every single race we're losing in...have our candidate go extra dirty. Sling a ton of mud, don't worry if he gets mud on himself either.

Then we'll replace him with a squeeky clean candidate. The other guy will have spent his cash and won't be able to build a halo like our new guy. I'm sure the RATs will start this strategy too, so elections now have a new tactic. Nominate the dirtiest guy you can and let the party choose your candidate. It's like whipping your horse in a horse race. Do it too early and your horse tires out. Do it to late and you won't recover in time. So this gives a whole new dynamic to the race.

BTW: I hope I'm wrong but don't expect the SCOTUS to touch this.


98 posted on 10/02/2002 3:21:28 PM PDT by for-q-clinton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: for-q-clinton
I don't expect them to take the case, either and part of me hopes they don't. I think there is a good chance Lautenburg will not win the election. If he does, it's one seat. If the Dems and their useful idiots in the media can get Democrat voters all around the country to think the Republicans are try ing to 'steal' another election, then it could tip the scales in some of the very close races around the country.
119 posted on 10/02/2002 3:25:47 PM PDT by Trust but Verify
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson