Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Inside Al Qaeda's Training Camps: What they?re ready for
NRO ^ | 10/1/2002 | Bryan Preston

Posted on 10/01/2002 6:44:42 AM PDT by Utah Girl

On a sunny day in rural Ohio, a routine traffic stop becomes a nightmare. As a sheriff's deputy approaches an apparently disabled pickup truck, armed men leap from its bed, spray him with gunfire and toss a homemade bomb into his squad car before escaping.

In Los Angeles, masked men capture a small office building, killing its security guards before taking more than a dozen hostages. As the day unfolds, the masked men demand time on local television, and use it to rail against American "decadence." Sometime near midnight, the terrorists kill all of their hostages in front of live cameras before setting off a bomb that destroys the building, kills themselves and leaves an indelible impression on the horrified audience.

In suburban Washington, D.C., a band of terrorists attack and kill a senator out for a round of golf. In Dallas, an unknown attacker gains entry into the house of a wealthy local businessman, and kills him by pumping 15 rounds from a .45 into his body. The assailant escapes into the night.

On the average day, any one of these crimes would make national headlines. Imagine if they all happened on the same day, at roughly the same time. Imagine if America's number-one enemy in the war on terror, al Qaeda, claimed responsibility before finishing the day with a cataclysmic attack reminiscent of 9/11. If training videos unearthed during last fall's campaign in Afghanistan are accurate, al Qaeda is planning just such a day for America and her allies.

Al Qaeda, the notorious terrorist gang responsible for killing 3,025 innocents a year ago, is still alive and planning future atrocities. Though last fall's military campaign robbed the group of its terrorist training bases in Afghanistan, and possibly of its leader, Osama bin Laden, there is every reason to believe that al Qaeda is still trying to train its troops in weapons use, tactics, and hostage-taking at bases we've yet to find and destroy. And as recent developments in upstate New York make clear, al Qaeda probably already has scores of sleeper troops inside the U.S. and around Europe — troops already trained, and awaiting their signal.

But what kind of training are these potential killers receiving? According to a U.S. Army assessment of its training videos, al Qaeda operatives get high quality, professional preparation to carry out a number of combat operations.

According to the Army's assessment, which I have reviewed, al Qaeda troops are well trained and can pose a serious tactical threat to American and allied forces engaging them. In fact, their training in matters ranging from weapons handling to multi-layered force structure suggests a level of professionalism that is likely the result of contact with a state military structure. When they initiate an attack, they don't go in as cowboys. Carrying their handguns in the high ready position, or their assault rifles in a disciplined, military bearing, they never handle or fire their weapons in a haphazard manner. Their strike forces divide into teams, coordinated along lines of responsibility such as assault, security and support elements. These sub-elements maintain synchronicity via handheld radios.

Most chilling of all, the tactics seen on the al Qaeda training tape match nothing seen on the battlefields of Afghanistan. It's therefore reasonable to conclude that the videotaped tactics are for some future attack. The entire tape points to such a conclusion. The ambush scenario featured six-lane highways with cloverleaf exit and entry patterns similar to those in the United States and Europe. Some of the hostage scenarios featured raids of buildings with large numbers of occupants, suggesting schools or businesses. The golf-course scenario certainly doesn't look like anything likely to be pulled off in most Middle Eastern countries.

Al Qaeda troops train via a set of combat scenes that vary in scale and intent. Scenarios seen on the tape include those described above, as well as several others that involve hostages. All hostage scenarios began with extreme violence — anyone offering resistance was shot and killed on the spot. During the siege, the terrorists play-acted dictating commands to the hostages in English, and the play-acting hostages responded in English. For these scenarios, the terrorists are trained to determine whether any law enforcement, military, security, or even armed citizens, are among the hostages. If they find such people among the prisoners, the terrorists will segregate them from the others, and will control them by threatening to harm the unarmed hostages. The end fate for such prisoners is ritual execution in front of TV cameras. In fact, all of these scenarios ended with the terrorists murdering all hostages and preparing to die in place. None of the hostage scenarios deviated from this pattern.

Dignitaries seem to be the target of the assassination on a golf course, as mentioned above. On the tape, the target was on the green when the terrorists fired a rocket-propelled grenade at a vehicle adjacent to the green. The Army assessment speculates that that vehicle probably belonged to the target's security detail, indicating that the target is a known VIP. Having destroyed the target's security, the terrorists then engage and kill the target with rifle fire. This scenario could constitute training to assassinate the current or a former U.S. president, or the head of state of a European ally. Other targets may include business and industry leaders, or high-ranking military officers.

The assessment also concludes that al Qaeda designs these raids to maximize media coverage. They would do this by combining mass casualty attacks such as 9/11 with other, smaller-scale attacks designed to get their operatives on camera to deliver messages and speeches. Al Qaeda would carry out the attacks simultaneously at multiple geographical locations to maximize their psychological effect.

The tapes also suggest that the group is shifting its tactics to take into account post 9/11 realities. During the past decade, al Qaeda established a pattern of always trying to top its last feat: A mostly failed attack on the World Trade Center in 1993 led to larger and deadlier attacks on a U.S. installation in Saudi Arabia, the U.S. embassies in Africa, the near-sinking of the USS Cole, and culminated on 9/11. But the U.S. bombing and ground campaign in Afghanistan has, by all accounts, decimated al Qaeda and scattered it across dozens of countries. Following that pattern of bigger and deadlier, we should expect al Qaeda to try a mass-destruction attack on an even higher-profile target than the WTC and the Pentagon, though few landmarks fit that description. But if the training tapes are our guide, a weakened al Qaeda would be planning a series of smaller attacks spread around the West, targeting soft targets which would offer little or no resistance. The purpose of such a spread attack would be to demonstrate that al Qaeda is still capable of carrying out attacks on our soil, and to instill fear and panic around the world. It would be successful on both counts, if we aren't prepared for it.

The assessment concluded that al Qaeda's training was highly organized, detailed, and highly realistic. The role-playing hostages made aggressive moves to simulate resistance at every turn, which the role-playing terrorists met with swift and brutal force. Al Qaeda trains its fighters in everything from multiple-team raids to motorcycle-borne drive-by shootings. They are trained to properly handle their weapons, to use explosives both for infiltrating buildings as well as intimidating their victims. They also train with live-fire as the norm, which gets them used to the sound, smell, and feel of combat.

The Army's assessment of al Qaeda's training should serve as a warning to the American people and to the rest of the world, and may implicate some of the regimes on our short list of terror sponsors. Recent reports indicate that Iraq hosted and trained several of al Qaeda's top lieutenants — the taped tactics suggest the involvement of a professional military at some level. The attacks depicted focused on vulnerable, unguarded, even random targets, and seem tailor-made to create panic and instill a lasting sense of insecurity. As Western intelligence uncovers more sleeper cells of al Qaeda's terrorists around the world, we should endeavor to learn all that we can about who has been to al Qaeda's camps, and where those operatives are now. The training should also serve to remind us of the true nature of our enemy: Al Qaeda is a ruthless, violent, but highly disciplined and organized enemy. We underestimate them at our peril.

— Bryan Preston is a writer and television producer. He is also the author of Junkyardblog.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: homelandsecurity; militia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 10/01/2002 6:44:42 AM PDT by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

VOTE THE RATS OUT!!

DONATE TODAY.
SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

2 posted on 10/01/2002 6:45:28 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
Absolutely chilling.
3 posted on 10/01/2002 6:47:25 AM PDT by homeschool mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
Pretty much makes the argument that every American should be armed...
4 posted on 10/01/2002 6:48:31 AM PDT by 2banana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
"In suburban Washington, D.C., a band of terrorists attack and kill a senator out for a round of golf." I don't think that this is a senator, but GW is who their after. Chilling!

Another reason to start packin'. We may not be able to stop the whole military type senerio, but we could put a dent in their operation before they take us out.

5 posted on 10/01/2002 6:55:04 AM PDT by notpoliticallycorewrecked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
One thing that nobody ever mentions is that Americans know now what the enemy is capable of.

If you were in a violent terrorist situation would you :
a.) Sit quietly and hope for the best even though you will most likely die.
b.) Fight back knowing you will most likely die.
6 posted on 10/01/2002 7:03:29 AM PDT by Cynderbean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cynderbean
C) Kill all the terroists and wrap them in pork.
7 posted on 10/01/2002 7:05:25 AM PDT by walkingdead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
A must read. Bump!
8 posted on 10/01/2002 7:06:22 AM PDT by Perseverando
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
If I were an Al Qaeda kingpin, I'd be putting a fair chunk of terror money into the Million Moms about now.
9 posted on 10/01/2002 7:07:12 AM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
As long as the Federal government refuses to get serious about the problem of large numbers of young Middle Eastern men in our midst and continues to permit their entry into our country, the threat of possible sabotage will remain. Instead, airport security officers (some of whom are Muslim) check 80 year old white women with body cavity searches and regard the 2 inch replica gun carried by a G.I. Joe doll as a threat to airport security. The Mexican and Canadian borders remain like sieves. Our northern neighbor, Canada, does an even worse job than we do in screening out possible terrorists arriving from overseas.

Prior to World War II, there were thousands of pro-Nazi German-American Bundists, and other followers of various fascist groups like the Silver Shirts and the Christian Front, many of whom were not of German ethnic background. Yet the U.S. had virtually no internal sabotage from these sources after Pearl Harbor, to a large extent because their leaders were rounded up or kept under close surveillance.

Providing for the common defense was the second reason given in the Preamble to the Constitution for establishing the United States, even before the Preamble mentions the general welfare. Would that our leaders remember their duties to provide for that defense!

10 posted on 10/01/2002 7:19:12 AM PDT by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cynderbean
If you were in a violent terrorist situation would you :
a.) Sit quietly and hope for the best even though you will most likely die.
b.)Fight back knowing you will most likely die.

I'll take option "B".

11 posted on 10/01/2002 7:32:21 AM PDT by scooter2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Wallace T.
I do agree that Saddam is a bad dude, and he is trying to get his hands on a nuke. My problem is 1) So are a half a dozen other dictators/dictatorships? 2) with the Russian scientists unemployed, and their arsenals are in the hand of underpaid bureaucrats, the probability of smuggling of nuclear material/or bombs is very high. What to do about this mess that we got ourselves into is the bigger question? Idiots and PC reactionaries may think well, let us screen every body that is going into every airports. Then, how about the subway, and the malls? My example of this situation that we got ourselves in is : You pissed your neighbors for some reason. It does not matter who pissed whom or why. Now, you can either 1) attempt to coexist and show your neighbors that you don’t hold the grudge; or 2) Kill or evict all your neighbors, or 3) Keep your neighbors their because it is politically incorrect to evict them, but stay up all night guarding your pets, children, cars, plants, food, and water… against any sabotage from these cowards who carry out their bad deeds at night! As you can see these three options are the only options we have got. The only feasible options are #1, and # 2!---The first if we can reconcile with the Moslems through negotiations? The second; if we can ship out all Moslems out of this country, so that our life would go back to normal. The idea of staying up all night to guard our stuff, or to make every freeking thing temper proof is costing us our way of life, and draining our economy! At this point, Saddam is not the only bad dude, as a matter of fact, he is not even the worst of the bunch! We must examine with honesty, how are we going to deal with these angry Islamic traitors who live among us? The choices are two: either make our Moslem citizens love us, or kick them out. WE know the first one is impossible, then we have only got one choice left, kick them out!
12 posted on 10/01/2002 7:39:54 AM PDT by philosofy123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
Bump!
13 posted on 10/01/2002 8:52:42 AM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: philosofy123
Unfotunately, the government will only move decisively after the next round of attacks - and even then, only if there is no other way to avoid the inevitable large scale round-up of potential terrorists. I believe the American people are ready today to do what's necessary.
14 posted on 10/01/2002 8:54:09 AM PDT by ZeitgeistSurfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
Thanks, Utah Girl. Passed on to where it'll hopefully do some good.

-archy-/-

15 posted on 10/01/2002 9:23:24 AM PDT by archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
Bump.

Mr. .357. Don't leave home without it. Learn how to use it. Get a concealed carry permit. Have it with you in your car and in your office.

Prepare yourself mentally to understand that what happens in the first 10 seconds will determine whether you, and your co-workers/family/friends live or die. Understand that if you do not act quickly and decisively, you and they will certainly die. Ask forgiveness of your Savior and remember the heros on flight 93.

16 posted on 10/01/2002 10:47:25 AM PDT by ffrancone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: HinduAmerican
We need to nuke Mecca. Forget Iraq, for now. I would invade Saudi Arabia, then Iran!
18 posted on 10/01/2002 11:25:46 AM PDT by philosofy123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: Utah Girl
Interesting to see this article right before all the people around DC were gunned down
20 posted on 10/05/2002 5:47:01 PM PDT by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson