Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kattracks
Still and all, the American public is strongly against the recognition of gay "marriages". They stand queasily for the culture of death but don't try throwing it in their faces. Democratic contol over all branches and agencies of government still wouldn't invent a plausible reason to outlaw home schooling.
The nut Noam Chomsky believes we have the two parties so that they might enact each others agenda without drawing fire. Sort of like a magician's misdirection. Think about what Bush has done. Had Clinton tried to do many of the same things he'd be undergoing a second impeachment trial!
Just because republicans lost control of the executive & legislative branches would not give the democrats carte blanche to turn America into an overtly communist country.
5 posted on 09/30/2002 9:58:03 PM PDT by thegreatbeast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: thegreatbeast
I for one would like to try out a RIGHT side governance for some period of my life, just for awhile.
7 posted on 09/30/2002 10:24:23 PM PDT by justrepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: thegreatbeast
Right. They would get more liberals on the surprere court. And if you don't think they would rule gay marriages constitutional and home schooling unconstitutional you think abortion is still illegal.

The liberal agenda has never been enacted by congress. It is has been dictated from the courts. Liberals having he house, senate and the presidency insures totally liberal justices appointed and confirmed on all courts including the supreme court. It ensures the constition says the liberal agenda is the law of the land.

You have to be very slow on the uptake.

You should never place a bet that you are smarter than a sack of rocks. While it is true a sack of rocks has never been right on any issue, it is also true that a sack of rocks has never been wrong on a single issue. That can not be said about you.

8 posted on 09/30/2002 10:47:04 PM PDT by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: thegreatbeast
Excuse me but just what are your political leanings with comments like you just made?

Why do you think the Clinton DemocRATs are holding up all those Bush Judicial nominations and why they won't let others come to the floor to vote? Hint: Because they are judges that are Rule of Law judges not the liberal we must make new law judges.

You must be living in another Country if you don't see the difference in having a Clinton DemocRAT in the WH and their controlling Congress. The Clinton DemocRATs passed the larged Tax hike in American history which we are still paying for. If we had not elected a Republican Congress in 1994, clinton would not have moved more to the middle. We would have had hillarycare and many other liberal packages.

If you are not a liberal DemocRAT, you sure will have surprised me! Their mantra is that we are all alike -- you can give that one a rest! The clinton DemocRAT Party is rotting from the core with their skirting the rules, breaking the laws with very little consequences, and putting Party and Unions over the best interests of the United States of America.

Looks to me like those three Congressmen who went to Iraq are perfect examples of the new Clinton DemocRAT Party!
11 posted on 10/02/2002 7:09:21 AM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson