Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Thank heavens we are on top of this..
1 posted on 09/30/2002 12:46:19 PM PDT by tip of the sword
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: tip of the sword
Sean Hannity just said that he is stepping down and his conference will appoint a person to run.
2 posted on 09/30/2002 12:49:10 PM PDT by Jeff Gordon Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tip of the sword
This will soon become a national public relations disaster for the greedy Democrats who simply don't want to let the public have their fair vote.
3 posted on 09/30/2002 12:49:44 PM PDT by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tip of the sword
I guess this is the fog of elections, with all the info flying about.
4 posted on 09/30/2002 12:50:05 PM PDT by swheats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tip of the sword
Hell yes we will be in court. These types of shenanigans are clearly New Jersey law. In addition, any plan that postpones the election is patently illegal under federal and constitutional law.

What should be clear here is that there is one party out there that is hysterical about KEEPING POWER. And their symbol, fittingly, is an ass.
5 posted on 09/30/2002 12:50:25 PM PDT by mrs9x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tip of the sword
Here's the appropriate code. It looks as if the Demorat governor can appoint someone to fill Toricelli's seat after the 30 day marker, and no election would be held for that seat until NEXT term.

NJ State Law.19:3-26. Vacancies in United States senate; election to fill; temporary appointment by governor If a vacancy shall happen in the representation of this state in the United States senate, it shall be filled at the general election next succeeding the happening thereof, unless such vacancy shall happen within thirty days next preceding such election, in which case it shall be filled by election at the second succeeding general election, unless the governor of this state shall deem it advisable to call a special election therefor, which he is authorized hereby to do. The governor of this state may make a temporary appointment of a senator of the United States from this state whenever a vacancy shall occur by reason of any cause other than the expiration of the term; and such appointee shall serve as such senator until a special election or general election shall have been held pursuant to law and the board of state canvassers can deliver to his successor a certificate of election.

FR must be swamped with FReepers on this subject...Had a hard time getting online.

7 posted on 09/30/2002 12:51:02 PM PDT by jdontom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tip of the sword
Voter disenfranchizement.
8 posted on 09/30/2002 12:51:21 PM PDT by cake_crumb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tip of the sword
This is neat our guy (the Rats say) can't win so we will just pick somebody, talk about rigging elections these people are blatant crooks.
11 posted on 09/30/2002 12:52:27 PM PDT by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tip of the sword
Per Associated Press, as reported by Sean Hannity:

"Unlikely that Bill Bradley will run in Torrecelli's place".
12 posted on 09/30/2002 12:52:56 PM PDT by Yankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tip of the sword
A lot of the reason Dubya won in Florida was that Jim Baker hired all the leading election lawyers in the state right after Election Day 2000. Kept them all from working for Gore -- including the Dem lawyers, like Barry Richard. With their money advantage, the Republicans now need to do the same in NJ.
16 posted on 09/30/2002 12:53:46 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tip of the sword
They should stay all over this issue. I would not put is past the dems to have realized that "Mr. T is not going to win, so how are we going to retain his seat?"

It's pretty obvious that the dems are going to try to throw someone in at the last minute who they think wil have a good chance against Forrester. OR, they might try to pull some B.S. utilizing some obscure law that allows the Governor of the state to get involved. Anyone who thinks that this is a last minute development has a lot to learn.

17 posted on 09/30/2002 12:53:56 PM PDT by Constitutional Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tip of the sword
What about a lawsuit in Hawaii? I don't consider a corpse as "residing" in the state they are elected.
18 posted on 09/30/2002 12:54:34 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tip of the sword
What does this do to the senate right now?
22 posted on 09/30/2002 12:55:36 PM PDT by Jeff Gordon Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tip of the sword
Yes, we are on top of it but there is no time for a legal battle IMHO. This reminds me of the Ashcroft debacle when a dead democrat was legally elected.

The democrat party is without morality or shame. All these things are overlooked for the power that is so important so that they can change the world as they percieve it. It is a (Taliban like) religion to them.

I will watch with amusement and a touch of disgust, fear and concern for these United States of America.

24 posted on 09/30/2002 12:56:00 PM PDT by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tip of the sword
The DemoRats thought they'd pull a fast one on the American people, first by whitewashing Torch's crimes in the secret Ethics procedure, then by a campaign of personal destruction against Torch's extortion victim. Now they see the People aren't buying it and want to change candidates at the last moment. They damned well better lose this contest or it will encourage more such corruption at the highest levels of our government.
38 posted on 09/30/2002 1:00:53 PM PDT by witnesstothefall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tip of the sword
I imagine the legal battle is over whether a new name can be on the ballot. A battle over postponing the election wouldn't require a response. Its not going to happen.
40 posted on 09/30/2002 1:01:33 PM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tip of the sword
The thing that really strikes me is that the Democrats are so willing to "game" the election after hollering that Bush was "politicizing the war."

That is the definition of "no shame."

-PJ

51 posted on 09/30/2002 1:05:11 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tip of the sword
And I think it will cast a huge dark shadow on the Democrat Party as a whole. This may have ramifications nationwide. Wishful thinking? Maybe.
53 posted on 09/30/2002 1:05:26 PM PDT by hsmomx3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tip of the sword
BTTT for the latest news on FreeRepublic!!!!!!
74 posted on 09/30/2002 1:13:59 PM PDT by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tip of the sword
I am a lawyer in New Jersey. While I am not up to speed on election law, I do know that the New Jersey Supreme Court makes the Florida Supreme Court look conservative. IMHO, this will wind up in the U.S. Supreme Court.
75 posted on 09/30/2002 1:14:24 PM PDT by MattinNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tip of the sword
"Thank heavens we are on top of this.."

Nope this is what the Dems Want...

Evil Repubs going to court to disenfranchise Dem Voters...

You can take this to the Bank!

82 posted on 09/30/2002 1:17:31 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson