To: gridlock
"If they're losing, just line up another candidate and see if he does better. Meanwhile, the honorable Republican has spent his time campaigning against one candidate, only to be faced with another."
sounds to me like a violation of the "equal justice" and "basic fairness" principles of the federal constitution.
The dems are planning to go to the supreme court and lose... and use it to claim WE stole the election AGAIN, "just like the last election..."
"He's a warrior" He's crying like a little girl!!!
To: Robert_Paulson2
Judge Napalitano just said the SCOTUS does not have jurisdiction. It must be the State Supreme court...or the District Court for nj.
To: Robert_Paulson2
"If they're losing, just line up another candidate and see if he does better. Good to know. We should have tried this with Lazio.
To: Robert_Paulson2
The dems are planning to go to the supreme court and lose... and use it to claim WE stole the election AGAIN, "just like the last election..." That's the only reason the 'Rats have to go to the Supreme Court. There is no way they have jurisdiction over this matter. The only reason is to lose to the Supremes and then demonize the Court and tell all the other Senate Races that that is the reason the Dems can't lose, or else they will get more bad decisions from a biased court.
Typical 'Rat ploy. But it isn't going to work. The Supreme Court will not rule on this. They will just kick it back to the state where it belongs.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson