Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Asks UN Council To Pressure Israel On Ramallah
Reuters ^

Posted on 09/23/2002 2:12:46 PM PDT by RCW2001

US asks UN council to pressure Israel on Ramallah

23 September 2002 20:17

By Irwin Arieff

UNITED NATIONS, Sept 23 (Reuters) - The United States introduced a draft resolution in the U.N. Security Council on Monday calling on Israel to stop destroying Palestinian installations in Ramallah.

Washington unveiled the measure on the fourth day of an Israeli siege of Palestinian President Yasser Arafat's Ramallah headquarters, during which Israeli soldiers destroyed every structure in the compound but the one occupied by Arafat.

Israeli forces entered the compound after two suicide bombings in Israel shattered a six-week lull in such attacks.

The 15-nation Security Council was meeting in emergency session at the request of Arab states alarmed by the siege. Washington had earlier criticized the siege as "unhelpful."

U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan warned Israel at the start of Monday's debate that its battering away at the Palestinian Authority was "a bankrupt policy" that bolstered extremists and would never end Middle East violence.

Annan also denounced Palestinian suicide bombings as "morally repugnant" acts that ate away at hopes for a political solution in the Middle East.

"The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is not going to be resolved by military might alone, or by violent means of any kind," Annan told the council.

"A policy based on forcing the other side to capitulate is a bankrupt policy. It is not working and it will never work. It only encourages desperation. It weakens moderates and strengthens extremists," Annan said.

The U.S. draft was offered as a substitute for a resolution put forward earlier by Palestinian U.N. Observer Nasser al-Kidwa, stating the council was "gravely concerned" by the Israeli reoccupation of Arafat's compound and demanding the withdrawal of Israeli forces from Palestinian cities.

BRING "TERRORISTS" TO JUSTICE

Washington's version also called on Israel to withdraw from Palestinian cities.

But it went on to ask the Jewish state "to cease measures in and around Ramallah, including the destruction of Palestinian civilian and security infrastructure, that aggravate the situation and that do not contribute to progress on comprehensive Palestinian civil and security reforms."

It demanded the complete cessation by all sides of "all acts of violence, including all acts of terror" and asked the Palestinian Authority to bring to justice those responsible for "terrorist acts."

U.S. Ambassador John Negroponte made clear in a speech to the council that Washington, which has veto power in the council and is Israel's closest ally, opposed the Palestinian draft resolution, even as he criticized the siege.

"We will not support the adoption of a one-sided text that fails to recognize that this conflict has two sides," he said.

But Negroponte stopped short of a veto threat, even though Washington had said in July it would block any Middle East resolution that failed to explicitly condemn terrorism and to condemn by name three Palestinian groups that have claimed responsibility for suicide bombings in Israel.

With the United States wooing Arab support in anticipation of a possible strike against Iraq, "Washington doesn't dare use its veto," said Ambassador Jagdish Koonjul of Mauritius.

The Quartet of international Middle East mediators -- the United States, the European Union, Russia and the United Nations -- last week laid out a blueprint leading to a Palestinian state within three years as Israel's security concerns are addressed.

But Israeli Ambassador Yehuda Lancry blamed "Palestinian terrorist groups" for setting back peace efforts and said his country's tough military stance was the only thing standing between the suicide bombers and Israeli civilians.

"If the Palestinian leadership is unwilling to confront these demonstrated enemies of peace, then it undermines its claims to be a partner for peace," Lancry said.

Palestinian U.N. observer Nasser al-Kidwa accused Israel of defying three decades of Security Council resolutions and asked the council to "shoulder its responsibilities" and ensure these were enforced. ((United Nations bureau, +1 212 355-6053, fax 1 212 355-0143, irwin.arieff@reuters.com))


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Israel
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: RCW2001
Why this resolution? Two words: Colin Powell.
21 posted on 09/23/2002 3:16:13 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodieD
post 5.....
22 posted on 09/23/2002 3:24:05 PM PDT by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
It demanded the complete cessation by all sides of "all acts of violence, including all acts of terror" and asked the Palestinian Authority to bring to justice those responsible for "terrorist acts."

The UN has repeated this same sentence for how many years now? I've heard it at least a thousand times.

23 posted on 09/23/2002 3:36:20 PM PDT by Sender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lion's Cub
There's only one building left and Israel had already said they weren't planning to destroy that.


24 posted on 09/23/2002 3:43:23 PM PDT by Alouette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
Thanks for the nomination! };^D )
25 posted on 09/23/2002 3:47:44 PM PDT by RJayneJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

Comment #27 Removed by Moderator

To: white trash redneck
So you're saying that we introduced a resolution demanding that Israel cease and desist after they had already accomplished everything they wanted to do?

That's what the article says. They had already stopped the demolition yesterday.

As for the rest of the resolution

Washington's version also called on Israel to withdraw from Palestinian cities

you'll notice there's no timetable involved.

28 posted on 09/23/2002 4:42:19 PM PDT by Lion's Cub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
I'm really disappointed with the U.S government's decision to reward PLO terror and Arafart's leadership. This move to condemn and isolate Israel will have the opposite effect of what the world hopes; it will speed up the expulsion of Arafart and the Hamas and Islamic Jihad leaders. Until now Israel had refrained from it because Israel would take a beating in world opinion, but since Israel is already paying a price of total political isolation now, it stands to reason an expulsion decision today would not make matters worse and might even improve them. Regardless of what the U.N or the U.S do or do not do, the PLO/Hamas as histoire.
29 posted on 09/23/2002 4:49:42 PM PDT by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
To hell with mollifying the Arabs.. kill em.
30 posted on 09/23/2002 4:58:25 PM PDT by goodieD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: DrJET
Israel is no friend of ours. Something about ordering attacks on the USS Liberty in 86, Pollard, Rich and Clinton

Too bad you're wasting all that hate and anger on the wrong people. Blame the prick in DC who insisted the Liberty not withdraw. That's the idiot who refused to grasp the gravity of the situation. Had we been in Israel's shoes, we'd have done exactly the same thing.

As for Pollard, of course they have spies here, just like everyone else. We have spies over there, too. Stop being so sanctimonious and pretending it's something outrageous.

As for Clinton and Rich, I hardly think you can blame Israel for them. In fact, I wouldn't blame them for being angry with us after all Clinton's meddling in their elections.

31 posted on 09/23/2002 5:04:01 PM PDT by Lion's Cub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
The Kaaba?
32 posted on 09/23/2002 5:23:37 PM PDT by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: dawn53
Not only that.... But look at who is running this (Reuters)

Look at the quotes and tell me if you see the justification for this title.

This is just another example of "Reuters Spin"

By this time tomorrow the TRUTH will dis-credit Reuters as usual. Israel has no better friend than GWB. They've said so themselves.

33 posted on 09/23/2002 5:23:58 PM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

34 posted on 09/23/2002 5:25:02 PM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
This is idiotic.

We deny the Israelis the right of self-preservation while kowtowing to the Islamists.
35 posted on 09/23/2002 5:46:14 PM PDT by Man of the Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
It sure is going to be interesting when Israel starts pumping oil and gas from a region that is in political dispute...the Shomron.
And if the oil and gas reserves under the dead sea are exactly what the data projects...for sure the Arab world will really become unhinged.

"Allah has given the Jews oil...this can never be"!

Big kick in the head Hamdi...big hit to the family jewels!!

Oil in the Shomron

Dead sea reserves

Zion Oil and Gas

36 posted on 09/23/2002 6:17:52 PM PDT by Light Speed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: sheik yerbouty
The Kaaba?

I always wondered why those buildings have a crescent moon on them. Now I know. Temples to the moon god.

37 posted on 09/23/2002 6:22:40 PM PDT by Alouette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Lion's Cub
Now ther's an interesting take.
38 posted on 09/23/2002 6:36:41 PM PDT by steveegg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: montag813
I suspect it's more "for the record"!
39 posted on 09/23/2002 6:38:01 PM PDT by mikeIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Appeasement never works. Got it, Coli?
40 posted on 09/23/2002 6:57:42 PM PDT by eclectic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson