Posted on 09/19/2002 9:40:49 AM PDT by southern rock
We are making law in this country simply for the purpose of making grieving victim's relatives feel better. That is truly horrific and shocking.
However, the one question that I have had from the beginning is: Since Pangle was only arrested for DWI, Not Convicted (and assumed innocent until proven guilty), then how can another party be responsible at all? Does this open up the possibility that bail bondsmen can be responsible if their clients go out and commit additional similar crimes prior to conviction?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.