Skip to comments.
The Men Who Run the World
http://www.endtime.com/html/past_article.asp?ID=7 ^
| June 2000
| Irvin Baxter Jr
Posted on 09/14/2002 6:06:40 AM PDT by Moosefart
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
My wife received this from a friend. I had never read it before. Thoughts?
1
posted on
09/14/2002 6:06:40 AM PDT
by
Moosefart
To: Moosefart
I have listened to Irvin Baxter on the radio. I have not studied this much but the man seems to be a step above Hal Lindsey in my opinion. I have copied the article and I will check some of his claims when I have time. Thanks for posting it.
To: Moosefart
Interesting article. It is true that the New Age movement is loosely linked with the New World Order types, who want a One World Government. I say loosely because it is mostly along the lines of writings from proto-New Agers back in the 20's and 30's that provide the inspiration, and the New Ager media darlings today - not that much different from the Hollywood types.
Of course the UN politicos want a one world government - they see themselves as running it. And of course they want a philosopy to justify it - which they have found.
But they won't get what they want. The reason is shown simply by quoting two communists: (1) Mao - "Power come from the barrel of a gun"; and Stalin - "How many divisions does he have".
The US has a constitution. The US military is sworn to protect the constitution. If ordered to turn over control of the US to the UN, by their oath they will reject the order. The US congress is bound by self interest - they have no desire to put themselves under the UN. The American people have no desire to do so either.
The UN is a useful fiction that the US can use when they don't want to appear too "unilateralist". But the US military spending is equal to that of the next 7 nations COMBINED. We cannot be defeated militarily. Who cares what the UN says.
All the tin hats together can talk about conspiracies, all the alphabet soup of agencies and wealthy individuals trying to bring about a one world government. They can talk about international law restricting the US. Bah. There is no law without enforcement. The US will do what it wants to do.
3
posted on
09/14/2002 6:29:04 AM PDT
by
dark_lord
To: dark_lord
The US military is sworn to protect the constitution. If ordered to turn over control of the US to the UN, by their oath they will reject the order. Nice try dark lord, but the US military has already done the bidding of the Globalists, when IX42 had them bomb the sovereign nation of Yuloslavia! They have become a tool in the hands of an evil President.
4
posted on
09/14/2002 6:45:32 AM PDT
by
F-117A
To: Moosefart
Ah, yes, make sure not to mention that this --what shall I call it?--
blather-- came from a site named Endtimes. And what screed about the endtimes would be complete with out references to the Pope and the anti-Christ?
Are you really this disassociated from reality?
To: Moosefart
Your screen name is as amusing as the article.
6
posted on
09/14/2002 6:55:36 AM PDT
by
verity
To: dark_lord
"The US has a constitution. The US military is sworn to protect the constitution. If ordered to turn over control of the US to the UN, by their oath they will reject the order. "Sorry to say this but, our military has already proven your statement above to be incorrect. Our military today does serve (at least in specific assignments) directly under UN command and performing the will of the UN.
While I know these are all good, solid Americans, loyalties slowly shift by degrees and we've already allowed things to start down that slippery slope.
7
posted on
09/14/2002 6:55:36 AM PDT
by
Lloyd227
To: independentmind
Ah, yes, make sure not to mention that this --what shall I call it?-- blather-- came from a site named Endtimes. And what screed about the endtimes would be complete with out references to the Pope and the anti-Christ? Are you really this disassociated from reality?
Hmmmm, must have hit a nerve by Gad! In all honesty I thought the article was interesting period.
If I have offended you, sorry bout yer luck. BTW, what exactly did you think was so "disassociated from reality" about the article?
8
posted on
09/14/2002 7:12:06 AM PDT
by
Moosefart
To: Raymond Hendrix
Your welcome. I had never heard of the guy before but I thought the article was interesting.
9
posted on
09/14/2002 7:14:31 AM PDT
by
Moosefart
To: verity
Your screen name is as amusing as the articleGlad you were amused by both!
To: dark_lord
While I agree with some of what you've written, how do you explain the US handing over land to the UN which is described as "World heritage sites", green belts and other such nonsense. It's amazes me how a lot of these very powerful enviro-groups collect money from ordinary folks, start to bank-roll the buyout of private lands, aquire the lands, then hand them over to branches of our gvt. sympathetic to the "plan 21" globlists. It's happening right now. The UN found out it's easy to glom land by taking it out of public use, theough simple local planning and zoning laws.
Yes the US does indeed have a constitution, but many of our leaders would just as well use it as a$$wipe, rather than follow it. I'm no right wing nut-ball, I just call it as I see it.
To: taxed2death
oops....theough = through.
To: F-117A
You are correct, the US military has already taken orders from UN commanders.
To: Moosefart
This book proves the historic fact that Prince Charles is
THE heart, soul, and spirit of the global "Sustainable
Development" agenda. The major end goal is to seize
control of earth's resources in order to "protect" them.
Just as Cohen briefly showed in "Antichrist and A Cup of
Tea", Charles envisioned the "Sustainable" issue as a
major means by which to bring global government into
reality. However, in a surprise development, this book
demonstrates that the U.S. Senate secretly passed control
of the United States back to Great Britain! Must read for
all who know the true plan.
To: Moosefart
To: Moosefart
To: Moosefart
I think there ARE a number of loosely linked NWO conspirators, and that among the most influential are Mikhail Gorbachev, the Rockefeller brothers, and bill and hillary clinton. BUT . . .
In the real world, conspirators seldom are as efficient or as successful as they think they are. They have a way of failing, eventually if not right away. Then they are swept into the dustbin of history as time moves on.
Napoleon is dead. Lenin is a has-been. Hitler is a has-been. Gorby is losing power and influence. Mary Robinson is quitting her job. The clintons are on their way out, and ambitious young Democrats are certain to shove them aside as they climb up the greasy pole of political power.
17
posted on
09/14/2002 9:02:31 AM PDT
by
Cicero
To: dark_lord
That was an insightful reply. I tend to agree with everything you had to say. Thanks for the post.
To: andy_card
Where did you get that picture of me!!!!!!!! You must have been in that black helicopter thats been following me....
To: Moosefart
Where did you get that picture of me!!!!!!!!I am one of the men who runs the world; I can do anything.
You must have been in that black helicopter thats been following me....
I never dirty my hands with such trifles. Probably some low-level lackey of mine.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson