Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: traditionalist
I was ready to pounce on this article, as having redefined National Socialism, until I came to the end, and saw that the writer has in effect tacitly admitted the point.

For the legal fallacies involved, I can cite no better source than The Constitution Of The United States. And for how to apply it, see A Constitutional Overview.

To rebut the economic fallacies involved, get hold of a copy of Ludwig Von Mises' classic Human Action, which specifically addresses all of the fallacious "isms" indicated. (For a brief rebuttal, see Economics & Common Sense.)

Basically, the writer has simply clothed the usual Socialist quackery in a few extra layers of rationalization. But Corporate quackery is no better than that advocated on behalf of any other special interest in the macro economy.

William Flax Return Of The Gods Web Site

6 posted on 09/13/2002 8:59:59 AM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ohioan
I neglected to pick up on the Welfare State aspect, earlier. See How The Welfare State Works!.

The appeal of the author's ideas will rapidly diminish for anyone who looks at the underbelly of their application. As I stated above, this is pure quackery.

William Flax

7 posted on 09/13/2002 9:20:14 AM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson