Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: traditionalist
While I still think Pat's morally tone deaf to let this be published today, he does raise an important point. If we go into Iraq, what do we do next? What is our eventual exit strategy, if we have one? What do we hope or expect to leave behind. How realistic are those hopes and expectations? Is the coming war really likely to leave us more secure?

Iraq was the frontier of both the Roman and the British empires. The turbulent history of Iraq under the British protectorate and afterwards suggests how difficult it would be to rule the country. The Wall Street Journal once suggested that we could have a McArthur style regency over the country. I suspect the reality may be more like Haiti or Nicaragua, a country that we are continually compelled to intervene in to settle its affairs "once and for all." An important difference, though, is that overall Latin American resentment of the norteamericanos is much less than Muslim anger at the West. Thus we could have a low-level war with terrorist acts and military flair ups for a very long time. The current enthusiasm for empire forgets about the violent, on-going resistance to it.

86 posted on 09/11/2002 9:21:08 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: one_particular_harbour; Cultural Jihad
((((( Ping )))))
144 posted on 09/12/2002 9:41:33 AM PDT by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson