Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Islamic concept of Al-Taqiyah to infiltrate and destroy kafir countries
website ^ | JUNE 2000 VOLUME 2 NUMBER 6 | Dr. Walid

Posted on 09/09/2002 3:12:24 AM PDT by dennisw

 

 

BHARATIYA PRAGNA

JUNE 2000 VOLUME 2 NUMBER 6

Islamic concept of Al-Taqiyah to infiltrate and destroy kafir countries

- Dr. Walid

This article by Dr. Walid, a top scholar at the Islamic University, exposes our so-called secular Indian Muslims.  By the doctrine of Al-Taqiyah, Muslims dominate crime syndicates, increase population by massive Bangladeshi infiltration and make temporary alliances with Dalits, Christians, etc.

In the early years of the Islamic conquest of the Arabian peninsula and in the Fatah (Arab-Islamic invasion and conquest of the upper Middle East and the outside world), a Muslim concept was devised to achieve success against the enemy (non Muslims), Al-Taqiyah.
Al-Taqiyah, from the verb Ittaqu, means linguistically dodge the threat. Politically it means simulate whatever status you need in order to win the war against the enemy ...

According to Al-Taqiyah, Muslims were granted the Shar'iyee right (legitimacy) to infiltrate the Dar el-Harb (war zone), infiltrate the enemy's cities and forums and plant the seeds of discord and sedition. These agents were acting on behalf of the Muslim authority at war, and therefore were not considered as lying against or denouncing the tenants of Islam.

They were "legitimate" mujahedeen, whose mission was to undermine the enemy's resistance and level of mobilization. One of their major objectives was to cause a split among the enemy's camp while downplaying the issues related to Islam ("Oh, I am not religious." "Oh, that is not Islam, you are mistaken, there is so much misinformation." "Oh, it is in the interpretation." "Brother, Islam is all about peace and love and music just like in the 60s.")
In many instances, they convinced their targeted audiences that Jihad is not aimed at them, that indigenous people are not targeted. Meanwhile the (allegedly) "un Islamic" Muslims continued their attacks on the target's property and life (e.g. Lashkar-e Toyiba, Mujahideen and Osama Bin Laden's declaration of war against innocent American civilians).

They convinced many Jews that they will be protected from Christians, and they convinced many Christians that Jews were the mortal enemies, because they killed Issa (Jesus). They convinced the Aramaics, Copts, and Hebrews that the enemy is Greece, and signed peace agreements with the Bysantines Greeks at the expense of Maronite Aramaics, etc.

They convinced the knitted diversity of India to degrade into civil war by introduction of a variant Buddhist / mystical Islam (Sufism which is decried as "deviant Islam" used to ease the transition of new recruits from local communities) creating divisions (based on Muslim - Non Muslim) eventually fomenting unrest and chaos in the land to prepare it for waves of armed Invasion (Mohammad bin Qasim, Mahmud Ghaznavi, etc.).

Even today, India is bitterly divided and getting slowly Islamised as battle lines form between hordes of overzealous Muslims (armed and trained in madrasahs) and the more pacifist civilians of urban dwellings.

This Jihadic agency of subversion was one of the most fascinating and efficient arms of the conquest. In less than four decades, the Middle East fell to the Arab-Islamic rule [since Arab society was divided again between pagan and Muslim resulting in nephews and sons killing their uncles and fathers in cold blood] followed by North Africa and Central Asia [this was the era of hordes like tribal conquests where barbaric savages invaded pacifist civilians in towns of major civilizations; the same scenario replayed itself against the Arab-Islamic world with the Invasion of the Mongolian hordes].

 Al-Taqiyah was a formidable weapon, used by the first dynasties and strategists. Today, scholars may identify it as deception. But the Jihadic deception was and still is more powerful than the James Bondian methods of Western classical intelligence tactics, for the simple reason that it has a civilizational, global dimension versus the narrow State interest of the regular Western subversive methods.

Al-Taqiyah is still in use today (and is widely practised and acknowledged by the Shi'ite sect) but not necessarily State-organized. Arab-Islamic missionaries are slowly converting the disillusioned criminal classes of the Western world by feeding them a Western "moderate" version of Islam (at the same time denouncing the actions of Muslims in the rest of the world as Un Islamic e.g. Taliban, GIA & FIA [Armed Islamic Front] of Algeria, Hamas, Lashkar -e Toyiba, Bin Laden and company, etc.)

It is done to prevent the new converts from seeing the real face of Islam; at least until their faith or mental conditioning is strong enough to make them turn against their own country and people.

A good example is the growing influence of Islamists in the Americas. On the one hand, American embassies, trade facilities, soldiers and intelligence infrastructures are under attack (but denounced as un-Islamic for the benefit of the new American converts).

On the other hand, the multiplying Islamic community (due to illegal immigration, paper marriages, religious visas granted to the religious men) attempts to pass itself off as "peace loving" and patriotic. In their own circles, the same community will liberally and violently denounce America, the West and its values (freedom, individualism, secularism, capitalism, scientific materialism, benign rehabilitation of criminals, prevention of cruelty against animals, women and gay rights).

One can easily detect Taqiyah in the two discourses used by Islamist strategists. On the one hand, one comprehensive Islamist theory is attempting to mobilize the Middle East, and sometimes Western Christian leaders and intellectuals, against "evil Jews".

They are forming alliances with everyone from Animal Rights' groups (to attack the Jewish tradition of slaughter which is ironically similar in cruelty to the Islamic way) to Far Right fundamentalists (to push for censorship of critiques of Islam and attack every forward thinking movement like women's rights and gay rights).

We see considerable success on that level. And on the other hand, another Islamist comprehensive theory is attempting - with success also - to mobilize the Jews against "evil and pagan Christians".

One can easily detect the sophisticated work of Taqiyah, for the strategic objective of Islamists is to destroy the foundations of the non Muslim civilizations, as a prelude to the defeat of an isolated Israel, India, United States of America, Britain, Germany, France, Italy, Russia, Egypt, Afghanistan, etc.

Taqiyah is not a unique phenomenon in history. Many strategists from all backgrounds implemented subversion. But the uniqueness of today's Taqiyah is its success within advanced and sophisticated societies. Taqiyah is winning massively because of the immense lack of knowledge among Western elites, both Jewish and Christian.

For interesting examples of Taqiyah methods, visit Christian discussion groups and forums and note the discourse of Islamist visitors aimed at undermining the Christian perception of Jews, and visit Jewish discussion groups and forums and note the subtle anti-Christian discourse of Islamist visitors. It is really informative and fascinating.

 



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 09/09/2002 3:12:24 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: monkeyshine; ipaq2000; Lent; veronica; Sabramerican; beowolf; Nachum; BenF; angelo; ...
ping
2 posted on 09/09/2002 3:13:03 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
I posted a link to an earlier FreeRepublic thread from 10/15/2001 with this info here last night.

But worth posting again as a "new" thread. I still think a majority think that we can reason and negotiate with the Islamics in a Western rational manner, when that is clearly not the case.

3 posted on 09/09/2002 3:32:04 AM PDT by FreedomPoster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster
I posted this due to your link. Thanks.
4 posted on 09/09/2002 3:33:39 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster
One must go and live there to know that rational thought cannot be established with these folks.
5 posted on 09/09/2002 3:45:43 AM PDT by widowithfoursons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: widowithfoursons
I've never lived there, and I've managed to figure it out. Then again, I read and pay attention to history, which makes me a bit of an oddball.
6 posted on 09/09/2002 3:47:41 AM PDT by FreedomPoster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster
Ah, but for you it's mental. You have to SEE the hate to believe it.
7 posted on 09/09/2002 3:50:43 AM PDT by widowithfoursons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Bump!
8 posted on 09/09/2002 4:37:56 AM PDT by F-117A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
There is a current case assigned to the Indian Supreme Court that's filed by the Muslime League. Basically, the case by Muslims is that the Indian Secular law can't apply to Muslims. Only Islamic Sharia Law can apply to Muslims. Once this case is defeted, look for fireworks in India by its Muslim "minority".
9 posted on 09/09/2002 5:11:50 AM PDT by USMMA_83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster
Then again, I read and pay attention to history, which makes me a bit of an oddball.

No, there are a significant number of us swimming upstream.

I had the singular experience of being cussed out by a well meaning but alcohol-impaired do-gooder this weekend for having the temerity to suggest overwhelming force as the only language Islam understands.

Having made a serious and life-long attempt to understand history in depth from the 6th century onwards I can only shake my head as I listen to all the "enlightened" morons, whose view of history is defined and circumscribed by their miserable tiny lives.

10 posted on 09/09/2002 5:20:49 AM PDT by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster
I still think a majority think that we can reason and negotiate with the Islamics in a Western rational manner, when that is clearly not the case.

Not with the Islamists, you can't. But neither can you with the Hindu/Vedic fundies that run the website this article comes from. The only thing that recommends them above the Islamists is that they are keeping their depravations (more or less) within the borders of India. But within India, Pragna Bharati and similar groups are more of a present threat to personal liberty, rationalism and secular government than the Islamics are (i.e. have any capability of being).

11 posted on 09/09/2002 5:50:51 AM PDT by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: USMMA_83
Yeah, the Muslims fundies want Sharia law, the Hindu fundies want Vedic law/education/science/politics. Secular goverance (where the same law applies to everybody) seems on the verge of flying apart in India. The only ground for optimism is that this has often been the case, yet India has managed to muddle along as the worlds largest democracy nevertheless. It's extremely important for the region and for the world that they continue to do so.
12 posted on 09/09/2002 5:57:04 AM PDT by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
If this writer thinks he has it bad with Moslems in India, he should see the situation in Israel!

Seriously, I would be the happiest man on earth if Israel and India could trade places in that respect. After all, Moslems in India largely accept the secular state, live and work peacefully with their Hindu neighbors, and serve with honor in the armed forces.

One prominent Moslem even got elected to the (ceremonial) office of that nation's president, after having served for many years as the head of India's missile program.

Also, I do not believe the author's denuncation of Sufism as part of Islam's "grand plan".

Sufis do appear to be far more peaceful and friendly than most Moslems, and in fact have suffered much persecution from their co-religionists for being insufficiently hardline.

Of course (and unfortunately), the Sufis are a small minority -- too small, at this moment, to provide a basis for a Western-led reconstruction of the Islamic world.
13 posted on 09/09/2002 6:17:56 AM PDT by tictoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Stick-together-kafirs bump.
14 posted on 09/09/2002 6:53:21 AM PDT by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
Stick-together-kafirs bump.

Sorry. Not inclined to "stick together" with Hindu fundies just 'cause they hate Muslim fundies (and more than that, as another poster pointed out they lump Sufis with Islamists). These folks are pushing for the Hindu equivalent of the Islamic State. "Vedic Law," "Vedic Science," "Vedic This" and "Vedic That," might be marginally preferable to the Islamic equivalents but would still tear down India's stunning accomplishments in advancing non-sectarian representative government, rule of law, growing tech-oriented economy, etc.

Not to mention (or, rather, to mention) that Hindu fundies have been very industrious in killing Christian missionaries and service workers over the years. So far as I know they don't videotape their murders and delight in reviewing scenes of decapitation, but again, any such advantages over their Muslim equivalents are merely marginal.

15 posted on 09/09/2002 8:47:38 AM PDT by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
bump
16 posted on 09/09/2002 9:29:52 AM PDT by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stultis
Not to mention (or, rather, to mention) that Hindu fundies have been very industrious in killing Christian missionaries and service workers over the years. So far as I know they don't videotape their murders and delight in reviewing scenes of decapitation, but again, any such advantages over their Muslim equivalents are merely marginal.

I guess the difference is that the Hindu fanatics aren't hell-bent on taking over the world by force, which is pretty-much a central teaching of the Mohammedan religion.

17 posted on 09/09/2002 11:01:29 AM PDT by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
bump
18 posted on 09/13/2002 5:07:56 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: timestax
Thanks for the bump.
19 posted on 09/13/2002 10:08:08 PM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
bttttttttttttt
20 posted on 09/14/2002 10:55:11 PM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson