Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HaveGunWillTravel
One was thing was good, one was bad.

And which was which? (and if I'm being obtuse, I apologize in advance of your answer)

81 posted on 09/04/2002 1:52:48 PM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: mhking
I'm against loss of liberty for anyone. Base your inferences on that. I am not against any part of the bill of rights. I am against actions on the part of the government which tend to violate it. I do have trouble with some later amendments. I particularly have trouble with policies which require an amendment where the amendment has yet to take place. For example: The constitution was properly amended to allow for prohibition whether I agree with the amendment or not. It has yet to be amended to allow for the war on drugs. The government is our servant, not our master. How can a free man's rights flow from the servant? It can't unless the servant is really the master. How can a servant be allowed to be armed when the master isn't? It can't. Unless it is really the master....etc. Rights that flow from an amendment are merely privileges granted by the master that can be rescinded at any time.
89 posted on 09/04/2002 2:01:03 PM PDT by HaveGunWillTravel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson