On the Importance of Jihad as a Means of Destroying the 'Infidel Countries'

The Middle East Media Research Institute ^ | September 04, 2002 | MEMRI

[JohnathanRGalt]

A website hosted in Clifton, New Jersey and affiliated with Al-Qa'ida ( www.Jehad.net ) is calling on Muslims throughout the world to "torture infidels".

---

Special Dispatch Series - No. 418
September 04, 2002	No.418
An Al-Qa'ida-Affiliated Online Magazine: On the Importance of Jihad as a Means of Destroying the 'Infidel Countries' In an article in the sixteenth issue of the online magazine Al-Ansar, which is affiliated with Al-Qa'ida ,(1) a columnist identified as Seif Al-Din Al-Ansari discussed the Koranic verse "Allah Will Torture Them [the Infidels] At Your Hands": The Annihilation of the Infidels is a Divine Decree "Regardless of the norms of 'humanist' belief, which sees destroying the infidel countries as a tragedy requiring us to show some conscientious empathy and... an atmosphere of sadness for the loss that is to be caused to human civilization - an approach that does not distinguish between believer and infidel... - I would like to stress that annihilating the infidels is an inarguable fact, as this is the [divine] decree of fate..." "When the Koran places these tortures [to be inflicted on the infidels] in the solid framework of reward and punishment... it seeks to root this predestined fact in the consciousness of the Muslim group, asserting that the infidels will be annihilated, so as to open a window of hope to the Muslim group..." "Nevertheless, [this divine decree] has become, for some, a tranquilizing pill... When the enemy launches operations of colonialism and destruction, we find that a few [of the Muslims] refrain from entering the battlefield claiming that the elements of the collapse of Western civilization are proliferating [in any event]." "Their conclusion is indeed true, but the way in which it is presented is misleading, and it is aimed at removing responsibility [to fight the infidels] from the Muslim, with the claim that Allah has already promised to take care of the infidels' annihilation." Muslims Must Not Wait Passively for the Divine Decree to Just Happen "...I would like to point out the danger of this analysis, because it... [may] make the Muslims passive and turn [them] into one who does not act to carry out [the commandments] of the religion or to dispel falsehood, but lives always in an atmosphere of passive waiting, that is cloaked - always - by a call to trust in the ability of Allah!!" "When Allah told us of the certainty of the annihilation of the infidels, He did not do so using ambiguous concepts. He clarified that this would be achieved in one of two ways: by means of a direct act of Allah... or by means of the Muslim group, which would, in accordance with the Islamic commandment, serve as an implement for carrying out [the divine decree], as it is said: '...Allah will torture them [the infidels] Himself or at our hands (Koran 9:52).'" "Yes, perhaps it is predetermined that the infidel country will be annihilated. But [if the believers do not act] this kind of annihilation will never be in favor of the Islamic state. The infidel country will be annihilated in favor of an infidel country like it or even worse than it..." "Therefore, the belief in 'annihilating the country of heresy' [only] opens up for us a window of hope, and sets for us a goal that is in the realm of the possible - but it does not annihilate the infidel country for us, nor does it even affect it!!" "This is merely a belief, which, if unaccompanied by the words 'at your hands' that appear in the Koranic verse [9:14, 'Fight them and Allah will torture them at your hands'] - it will remain in the wonderful realm of ideas that float in the theoretical universe, and is like beautiful dreams that arouse conscientious emotions - yet, when we awake, we find that the infidel country still exists, falsehood is not destroyed [by itself] in favor of the truth, [except when] the truth goes into action..." "The importance of the human effort to annihilate the infidels... is what Allah sought to teach the Muslims at the Battle of Uhud [625]. Then, there were [Muslims] who thought that because they were right they would most certainly defeat the enemy. The [Muslims] paid a high price for this..." "By Means of Jihad - Allah Tortures [the Infidels] with Killing" "The question now on the agenda is, how is the torture Allah wants done at our hands to be carried out?... This torture will not, in any way, be carried out by means of preaching [Da'wa], because preaching is activity of exposure, aimed at clarifying the truth in a way that makes it more easily acceptable. Preaching has nothing to do with torture; Jihad is the way of torturing [the infidels] at our hands." "By means of Jihad, Allah tortures them with killing; by means of Jihad, Allah tortures them with injury; by means of Jihad, Allah tortures them with loss of property; by means of Jihad, Allah tortures them with loss of ruling. Allah tortures them by means of Jihad - that is, with heated war that draws its fire from the military front..." "The Tortures Will Bring the Infidels to the Path of Righteousness" "Material power is [to be] confronted with material power, and ideological power is [to be] confronted with ideological power... It would be idiocy to rely on the power of the truth in the face of F-16s. Allah is capable of destroying His enemy without anyone's mediation and without anyone's help, as His capability is absolute and unsurpassed. In spite of all the characteristics of power at their command, these infidel states are no more than a handful of creatures on the speck of dust called Planet Earth... [But] Jihad serves as a trial by suffering for the Muslims by means of the infidels, and for the infidels by means of the Muslims." "The Muslims' trial by suffering is manifested in Jihad's being the instrument by which it is possible to differentiate between the believers and the hypocrites... The infidels' trial by suffering is manifested in Jihad being an exemplary lesson in values, delivered by a group of the pioneers of the Islamic nation, in a practical presentation" "Many of the infidels will be shocked; their emotional entity will be shaken; and perhaps some of them will repent and learn their lesson. In addition, Jihad is a means of defeating them, and perhaps by means of this victory... the tortures will bring them back to the path of righteousness..." Endnotes: (1) Al-Ansar, No. 16, August 24, 2002, www.jehad.net . See MEMRI dispatches: No. 353: http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=sd&ID=SP35302 No. 344: http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=sd&ID=SP34402

[ZULU]

Clifton, New Jersey is very close to Patterson, New Jersey, a city with a VERY large Islamic Arab population center.
Neither the rhetoric, nor the source surprises me.

Its beyond belief that a country which rounded up a bunch of loyal Americans merely on the basis of their Japanese ancestry and put them in concentration camps because Japan attacked an American MILITARY target, can continue to tolerate the presence of a population which openly approves of, supports, and participated in, such a horrific assault on American CIVILIANS on American home soil, an assault which is certain to have sequels based on all available knowledge.

We should deport or incarcerate all Muslims in America as soon as possible, and prevent any more of these fifth columnists from invading our shores.

[tet68]

Funny, he is the one that used the leash analogy, I only
created a metaphor to illustrate it and he took offense.
I could care less, my patience wears thin.

Again, where are those Muslim-americans, who should be American-muslims ? The silence is deafening.

The American-Japanese proved their loyalty in spite of being
interned, where are the muslims who have been neither interned or harrassed?

Here in Atlanta, I drive by the mosque on 14th street and it's packed, there are no protestors, no vast armed guards to protect them from outraged citizens.
And that is as it should be, and if they were to affirm their interest in American ideals and belief they would
not be harmed even after the next attack by their mad brothers.
But mark my words, they will not be safe if they do not speak out, soon, and loudly against these rabid killers.

My best to you. Tet

[swarthyguy]

Sharif said>>>but the only way that you will learn the true meanings is to learn Arabic and read the origional Arabic text.

No non Arab can be a true muslim. Only an Arab can. Unspoken but true. Look at the pakistanis; lapdogs of the saudis, yet however much they try, they will never be considered on the same level as the guardians of meccanmedina.

Hence the insistence on reading the koran in arabic for true understanding. Then the copouts on the 'true' meaning of infidel or jihad can be bandied around, confusing the naive and gullible into accepting a sanitised view of this ideology that seeks to destroy every other way of life.

Islam = Arab imperialism = Naipaul

[JohnathanRGalt]

And that is as it should be, and if they were to affirm their interest in American ideals and belief they would not be harmed even after the next attack by their mad brothers. But mark my words, they will not be safe if they do not speak out, soon, and loudly against these rabid killers.

Perhaps the Muslim-americans are silent because they have seen what happens to those who speak out against the jehadis. Look at what happened to the Palistinians who collaborate with the Israelis.

[desertcry]

Yes, talking about elitism, the saudi monarchy, and the arabs in general are hard to beat. If arabs acquire true world power as we have, every ethnic groups will be slaves to to these masters of mecca, and medina. It will indeed be a world too terrible to live in. This, no Freedom loving people must never allow to happen.

[Cindy]

re your post #118 which you said: "Cindy, you have lost all grip on reality. FR does not encourage free speech.

I have had several fact-based posts pulled because they have expressed opinions that the moderators did not like. I have had my posting privileges suspended twice for not abiding by certain unpublished rules. Once was quite clearly for disputing the moderator's judgment in pulling a post or for publicly requesting some clarification about what the rules are.

Unlike many people who continue to post here with no problem, I have never resorted to ad hominem attacks on other posters, despite the fact that ad hominem attacks are against the rules.

As for me being hateful, that's baloney too."

I'm laughing Wotan. Hurrah for free speech on FreeRepublic.com. Your message was posted. Have a great weekend sir and thanks for the laugh.

[wotan]

Your message was posted

All that shows is in that particular message I didn't violate one of the Free Republic taboos.

Obviously. And, of course, you know that.

Open your mind, Cindy. You should try to understand the other person's point of view and then reply with a reasoned response.